why do I have the feeling that anybody who works for Cameroon Tribune thinks CPDM? I think Cameroon Tribune needs to be privatized so that can stop reading this ridiculous pro-CPDM articles.

Cameroon Tribune and CRTV are structures that have help Paul Biya and his ruthless regime to destroy Cameroon. People like Isa Tchiroma who are political prostitutes and have no grassroot backing can support Paul Biya because they are hungry. He proves his stupidity by claiming that foreign investors are scared if another person is head of state. Only corrupt foreign investors can be scrared. Secondly, how many foreign investors are in Cameroon presently, very little you know that because the evironment is not attractive. We are telling you people that the 98 % of Cameroonians are against the amendment of article 6 (2) of the 1996 constitution. If Paul Biya goes against our will, then he is staging a constitutional coup d'Etat and is liable to face impeachment. But before that happens, we are prepared to die this time around. WE WILL LET OUR BLOOD TO FLOW FOR YOUR SELFISH AMBITIONS.

We totally understand how the pro-government media operates in this country. Just that at the end of this lip service only one thought creeps into the mind; our media landscape has been eroded beyond repair. First, there has been no debate "that has flung open the gates of heated national 'chit chat'"-watch your English What we have seen is a few self minded people orchestrating media practitioners like your self into convincing the nation towards a disastrous cause. Life itself is subject to change(you claim)-you should first change from this ego massaging and apparently payole journalism. Change must not come only when it is centered on special interest. Change comes when it is needed; it comes for the good of a people and with the consent of the people.;change comes on the right issues and at the right time. This is no change, this is a repetition of twenty five year history of selfmindedness and power embezzlement. Those isolated references to some citizens does not help your point. On what basis do you categorise opinion leaders? Remember that opinion leaders reflect public opinion and it is rather bewildering that you will derail the articulation of public opinion as being pro amendment. Democracy are a set of rules that instutionalise freedom-don't get things twisted. It sets limits where neccessary and this is one. Leading democracies in the world practice limitation of a term of office for the president because they realise that things must change and no man has monopoly of knowledge to manage a country. It is not the shortcomings of our present constitution that has spurred this traumatic call for amendment but the shortcomings of the character of the government leaders; they are a bunch of failure who just want to consolidate their embezzling prowess. Lastly no individual has been kept out of the race by limiting the term of office; every individual has just been given a fair chance to perform his/her duties to the people-a chance which so far has been mismanaged. No body opposes change, people oppose unneccessary changes that set opportunities for particular people.