My comments on Peterkins article are based on two observations. 1)The world being a global village,i'll strongly advice,that we Cameroonians should stop narrowing our thinking to the size of that natural triangle called Cameroon. This said ,constitutional revision is a normal exercise in any nation wether that is done in good faith or not, that is another debate in it's own.Biya has not stood the test of time ,he had on several occasions recognised that for those who read his speeches in-between-the-lines.What if the revision suites some of us who think that a two-round presidential pool,an independent electoral commission,alternation of power between the Anglophons and the Francophones as a response to the Anglophone problem that has since been recognised by all right thinking Cameroonians etc?. As concerns Frudi's appraisal of Biya ,i think that is political elegance .It is normal for an individual to respect his oponent,politics is not war!We should avoid tension between Biya and FRu Ndi at all cost ,we are Africans.

I do not think Fru Ndi is what is needed to stand opposed to constitutional amendment that centres largely on benefitting some power embezzling leaders in this country. He has not proved himself worthy of trust or capable of airing out the cries of those Cameroonians who had been tricked into giving him their support. We need some better person with will power and steadfastness and not this frivolous andv flip flopping Fru Ndi. Good article Peterkins.

The person who wrote this article is an enemy of the SDF and its chairman. The SDF has its plans and does not stop any other Cameroonian from acting when things are going wrong. What appraisal do you make of the last riots in Cameroon. So because many people have lost their lives trying to unsit Paul Biya, Fru Ndi should should also lost his? You are really an idiot with a chicken brain. Your analysis are fit for the dust bin.