Kibaki and Raila do not have the credibilties to decide who must or must not face the the Kenyan tribunal. Similarly, Kofi Annan shouldn't have been aloowed to mediate the Kenyan violence which took the lives of over 1,500 poor Kenyans and displaced over 300,000 of them. Anna was not there to represent Kenya's interest. Similarly, Judge Kriegler of South Africa was not an honest broker for saying he could not identify who won 2007 Kenyan Presidential Elections. The presiding Kenyan Elections commisioner knows who won that election.

The rigging of Kenya's 2007 elections served the interests of people outside Kenya. Until Kenyans understand who is controlling their lives, things will never change. I do not know what Kibaki and Raila stand to gain by pointing fingers at other people after the election, in which the majority of voters made an honest choice who they wanted to represent them, was riggied by the very people who now threaten to send them to the Hague.

By the way, is this court at The Hague only designed for African brutes?

Kenyans should now re-cognize that whenever they mix the tails of THE REACTION---Kofi, the Ghanain; Tutu, the priest, and others obvious---that they are in for a hustle, which is exactly what happened.

Accordingly, the first accused should be THE 'PRESIDENT', and the second accused, R....

Cheers from the City of THE DESTRUCTION AND DECONSTRUCTION OF 'ELDERS' AND THE REACTION, HARARE.