Did I hear AU and ECOWAS condemning the military takeover in Guinea? Do AU and ECOWAS have what it takes to be true custodians of democracy? Where were AU and ECOWAS when Lansana Conteh actually, and in broad day light, seized power in questionable elections? I do not support the military takeover, but I think the military takeover is the less of the two evils. Having said that, the AU and ECOWAS should take more proactive positions on issues than to beat drums of rethorics just to give the international community a false sense of appeasement.

To my Guinean brothers and sisters, please reminisce about the past and imagine what you have endured. Please unite on a common sense...that Guinea is more important than everyone of you.

This has nothing to do with the AU or whatever.

We condemn soupists whether robed in civilian garb or khaki: down with the soupist coupists.

Please note, as a partial confirmation of our theory of territoriality, that the soupist gun toter, Camara, did not mention, in his announcement of the estrangement of power from his fellow soupists in 'parliament', THE NATION OF GUINEA.

And, correctly so: ain't no nation called "GUINEA." An occupied West African territory called "Guinea" vraiment.

AUTHORIZIED AND ISSUED BY THE ALL AFRICA ANTI-SOUPIST OPPOSITION IN EXILE.

I think the only effective solution to address the current political situation and the chronic corruption and crime is the military takeover. What will be the AU position if Mugabe is overthrown? I am very curious to know. Anyway, for the military takeover to be very effective, i suggest the following:

- an effective border control - arrest all members of the Conte regime - restructure the system (including the police) - bring in new constitution - ensure the best interest of all Guinean is served by giving them shares in all commercial contracts from foreign countries - the basic needs of the people of Guinea such as electric city, health care, agricultural production etc need to be met as soon as possible; -the new government should include well educated people.

Regards

Mohamed Kondeh

Sydney, Australia

Effective solution, you say, is a "military takeover"?

A fatal fissure in that categorial construction is the absence of the qualifier "soupist."

ALL COUPS IN WEST AFRICA SINCE THE SHAM INDEPENDENCE FROM THE SHACKLES OF BRITISH AND FRENCH IMPERIALISM have been soupist coups, sponsored by civilians who cannot nuke it out IN PLAIN VIEW with opposing, fake elections empowered soupist factions.

WE CANNOT CONDEMN THE PEOPLE FOR CHEERING THEIR VULTURES IN KHAKI GARBS, FOR THEY KNOW NOT WHAT TO THINK AFTER DECADES OF SOUPIST OSSIFIED BRAINWASHING.

Camara, similar to Conteh, is a SOUPIST.

Not even Christ can be otherwise, given the structural ambience of these occupied territories.

Occupied, because soupists merely inherited the policies of thievery by the French and British outlaws---French and British imperialism.

Accordingly, charisma, clout, bla, bla, bla, change nothing: the soupist structure stands under elections or coups---take your pick.

THE HISTORY OF WEST AFRICA POST 'INDEPENDENCE' HAS BEEN THE HISTORY OF THE AFRICANIZATION OF A SOUPIST STRUCTURE FIRST INSTITUTED BY BRITISH AND FRENCH IMPERIALISM.

It is in this sense, and only in this sense, that one can meaningfully speak of "neo-colonialism."

The theory of the soupist structure explicates the theory of "neo-colonialism." Colonialism never ended, for colonialism is first a territorial grab, and second, the institution of a political structure immune to the formation a nation.

Accordingly, soupism is colonialism africanized.

AUTHORIZED AND ISSUED BY THE REFLECTIVE ALL AFRICA ANTI-SOUPIST OPPOSITION IN EXILE.

"soupist"? Are you suggesting that the Conte's administration and chronic corrupt governemnt should continue to lead Guinea? Here is a question for you: if Mugabe is overthrown now, what will be your position or you think will be the position of the AU, the USA or the economic communities? Civilian and a proper democratic government is a long term solution. However, under the current circumstances and considering the never ending of the suffering of the Guinean, I think that the effective solution to address the issues is the military takeover to clean the system.

What is your suggestion to resolve the current issues in Guinea without Conte's regime?

Mohamed Kondeh Sydney, Australia

from every indication , Camarra might change one or two things. Not every military man is a war monger or dictator. I was actually expectin an exchange of bullets since the army is divided but this hasn't happened yet. I guess he's doing the right thing. All the Conte regime needs to be X-rayed well for corruption reasons and kept away from this new gov't. Camarra is not a stack illiterate. he has studied well and was trained abroad. He knows wat he's doing; The AU and ECOWAS should solve the problem in Zimbabwe before moving to Guinea. They are also 'toothless bulldogs'. Zimbabwe came up first so they should pay attention to it before turning eyes on Guinea. Camarra has just made a giant step which will lead to a prosperous Guinea

Thank you for your comment -Halleydavidson. Your thinking and observation is consistent with mine. We should all support Camara for his courage and good thinking. The system should be retructured and must not include any of Conte's regime. The only job the old regime should be given in order to be productive is hard labour to build the railways and factoris they sold out. They should be jailed and asked to rebuild the railways lines and clean the streets with a very close supervison and monitoring.

Mohamed Kondeh Sydney, Australia.

Sir from down under I am not interested in advising Soupists about nada.

Sekou Toure, the arch thief, created THE ARICANIZED SOUPIST STRUCTURE in Guinea, due to the sudden 'exit' of French Imperialism. In brief, there was no mediation of soupist power, unlike Sierra Leone, Liberia, Gambia, Senegal, etc. The structure of soupism is intersubjective: it can capture even a 'saint.'

Now, do you contend that Camara, who is 'educated' and has been to the 'West' is a saint? A soupist he is and will always remain. Education, by the way, has nothing to do soupism; if anything, it corrupts education: intellectually and morally. As for "being in the West," we don't care about the political and socio-economic interests of the "West." Hence, Camara's "Western" exposure holds no consequence to us.

Look, we will never advocate a coup even against Satan. When the people take matters into their own hands, when they smash the soupist structure---the self-objectification of political irrationalism and nihilism---there, we say, CHANGE begins, offs.

Accordingly, we condemn soupist structured 'elections' and coups.

Understood?

Coups attempt to use soupist heuristics to resolve sedimented problems created by civilian soupist politicans.

The result is as predictable as it is odious: more soupist problems, seeding the soupist structure ever more firmly and deeper into the political culture and consciousness of the people.

It is a sign of political sophistication to recognize the identity and difference that cut across political problematics. Hence, to project the problem in Zimbabwe into soupified West Africa is worse than a category mistake: worse than mixing apples and oranges. On our position on Zimbabwe, we invite you to visit the Discussion Sections of Kenya, South Africa and Zimbabwe operated by this website.

AUTHORIZED AND ISSUED BY THE REFLECTIVE ANTI-SOUPIST OPPOSITION IN EXILE AND NOW IN SIERRA LEONE, LIBERIA, GUINEA AND GAMBIA, AND EXPANDING.

I am more interested int the welfare of the Guinean people who have suffered for many years. I am not interested in the notion of SOUPIST or the ideoplogical thinking and interpretation behind it. We should move forward and address the best interest of the Guinean people. As stated above, military takeover is an effective solution to affress the CURRENT Guinea problems NOT to go to the past. When the military cleaned the system, a proper demovratic election will be the next. Good education, knowledge and the proper use of it, should be part of the change. Lets just pray for a goodchange. Forthose who are part of the "SOUPIST", can by all means continue their interpretation. Sorry, I am not part of it. My focus is to advocate for the best interest of the Guinean people. and the way forward, are outlined above.

Mohamed Kondeh

Sydney, Australia

Vintage soupist rhetorical tour de force: "the welfare of the people."

Bunkum: soupists have never given a rat's tail about the "welfare of the people."

Should you continue to cling this trashy notion, then I risposte that soupists care about the "welfare of the people" as vultures care about the "welfare of their hosts."

En passant, soupism ain't no "notion," but a posited and explicated theory of the structure of West African politics.

AUTHORIZE AND ISSUED BY THE EVER VIGILANT REFLECTIVE ALL AFRICA ANTI-SOUPIST OPPOSITION.

I think the Guineans need a change,it does not matter who ever replace Lansana Conte. All we have to do is to support the present coup leader Captain Kamara, as an african we should start to think outside the box,he has made a promise that he will hand over in 2010.Au,Eu,America and the world should stop contradicting and listen to the voice of the poor Guineans.This is a lesson for those leaders who thinks they're extra ordinary, one day it will be your turn Mr Dictator leader,power is to be loyal and treats every one with respect and dignity,stop the wicked acts and remember that you are representing a nation or a society.

A change made by the use of the "GUN" you recommend is a good change? My brothers,stop fooling yourselves.If Capt. Kamara mean a good change,why suspend the constitution,ban all public gathering? I am in sympathy with the people of Guinea.There is nothing that we can do now to change the situation in Guinea. But we can whole-heartedly condemn it.For the AU,just shut up! and let the EU or America speak. Because if there is anything wrong,you will be running to America and EU, telling them you have troops but you can't sponsor their expenses.What a big shame! Thanks to Nigeria in many conficts.

We note with increasing alarm your deviation from fundamental principles of anti-soupism.

This is your second infringement. STOP!

ON ALL MATTERS SOCIO-POLITICAL, WE DO NOT LISTEN TO THE WEST, under the anti-soupist principle of authentic and principled REFLECTIVE SELF-DETERMINATION.

AUTHORIZED AND ISSUED BY THE REFLECTIVE ANTI-SOUPIST OPPOSITION IN EXILE, AND NOW IN THE SOUPIST OCCCUPIED TERRITORIES OF GUNIEA, SIERRA LEONE, GAMBIA, SENEGAL, NIGERIA, LIBERIA, AND EXPANDING.