The article failed to mention who took the photograph or was it taken by surveillance camera. The latter might also be wrong but whilst it is possibly right and in perfect working order, no mention of those who operate the same was mentioned. One of the most frequent factors in the accusation of priests, apart from the fact that the accused are always Catholic priests: not Jews, Muslims, rareley Anglicans, even lesser, Baptists, Prsbytrians etc; is that there ar never first hand witnesses mentioned. This I do not understand, but wait, I think I do; I see a $ sign.