The Herald (Harare)
Published by the government of Zimbabwe

Zimbabwe: How Do You Distinguish a Biological Warfare Disease From a Natural One?

Brigadier General (retired) David Chiweza

21 September 2006


column

Harare — Last week I shared the sensitive matter of biological warfare, and presented evidence that accepts that a biological warfare attack did take place at the same time HIV was being discovered in Zimbabwe.

The thesis is that this attack, the diseases and the deaths of our people is no ordinary coincidence. I hope you, the reader, are turning inside as much as I do and understand why it is important to share.

It comes back to the saying, "the truth sets you free". The Jewish Holocaust Memorial Centre has this bold scripture written at the entrance; "Joel 1 vs 2-3, 'Has anything like this ever happened in your days or in the days of your forefathers? Tell it to your children and let your children tell it to their children and their children to their next generation'".

The reason is very simple, we cannot learn from our experiences.

The biological warfare attack detailed in the BBC video appears to be just an isolated event with no link to our current HIV and Aids predicament. Few recognise the extent to which this event has shaped our circumstances, our policies, our information and mindset.

This event has also shaped global perceptions of reality as originators of the attack sought to cover their tracks.

It is necessary to discuss these issues in order to disentangle ourselves from the confusion. By the way, this is merely my opinion, based on a careful study and irrefutable evidence, of how events probably occurred.

In order to understand this it is necessary to briefly explain the essential issues a biological weapons attacker would have to deal with in order to launch a successful attack and still remain dignified in an international environment that openly condemns the use of biological weapons on other human beings under the Geneva Convention.

Biological warfare cannot be proved by just one event but by examining the whole process of it. As I have studied this situation I have been able to come up with key logical steps of biological warfare and to my amazement, there is evidence to show that all the steps have been fulfiled so far.

The first stage of biological warfare attack analysis is to determine whether there was a motive for someone to want to attack black people with germ warfare.

The scientists who testified in South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission testified: "Now I asked him, why Botha are you doing this? and he said: 'I have got one daughter and one day when the black people take over the country and my daughter asks me, 'Daddy what did you do to prevent this?' my conscience will be clean.

"Now I must admit that was the psychosis which prevailed."

The second matter to establish is whether or not some specific action to make things happen as intended took place.

The evidence presented in the BBC video shows that secret attacks were launched from South Africa into our county. Doctor Timothy Stamps confirmed that the country was used as a centre for evaluating the effectiveness of biological weapons.

The third stage is to establish whether or not there are results, which are consistent with the action taken. Every one of our citizens and the world knows that people are dying from an incurable disease called HIV.

It is at this point where views begin to go at a tangent with unsuspicious persons buying the view that the deaths occurring are due to a naturally occurring disease and others being of the view that it had to be this bio-warfare event that triggered HIV and the resultant deaths. Motive, action and results match. It is not surprising because the perpetrator must operate with two faces.

The fourth stage would be the use of disinformation to hide the events so that nobody would know and react effectively.

These lies would in turn maximise the effect of the germ warfare, conceal the fact that an attack occurred, the identity of the attackers, the fact that a certain group has been singled out for destruction and in essence hide the solution to the problem.

In order to hide the fact that an attack had occurred, HIV was introduced to the world as a discovery of a new and naturally occurring disease at the same time as the biological warfare attack was taking place.

There are now many scientists who allege that HIV is a laboratory virus. To remove focus on the region, it is possible that HIV was introduced into gay communities and drug abusers of white origin.

This explains why HIV among whites is restricted to the gay community. This shaped the opinion that everyone else is dying so the policies suggested by the world are honestly trying to help us.

To explain the questionable differences in infections in Southern Africa and the rest of the world, sexual promiscuity and poverty in the region became a plausible excuse.

The next stage is how to kill without killing yourself. Biological warfare weapons evidence led before the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission quoted a scientist proposing that, "he has got a product, a bacteria, which has got the possibility of only affecting, making sick and killing pigmented people".

Dr Leonard Horowitz, a US scientist and author of the book, "Emerging Viruses, Aids & Ebola, Nature or Accident?", indicated at his website that the Genome Project makes the technology of targeting groups with "ethno-specific" viruses a plausible reality for concern.

The next stage of the warfare is to hide the solution to the problem. Again the BBC video shows South Africa's bio-warfare scientist Mike Odendal confessing, "And the purpose of this project was to establish whether one could produce a strain of anthrax that would be resistant to penicillin."

The killer cannot give you medicine so that you live. From this it is logical to assume that there is a cure and possibly a vaccine hidden somewhere.

Having hidden a cure and a vaccine, I suspect there was still another problem. It is the "anti-virus nature" of the Public Health Act. With this, we could have contained HIV had it not been stolen from us.

Therefore every provision in the Act was attacked as breaching human rights to achieve the same purpose. I think we bought that and with it sold the millions that have died.

Having closed the three escape routes of cure, vaccine or the Public Health Act, the only option left is death.

Can this be another coincidence? Think about it this way. When digging out mice, you would first close the escape routes with a stone, then you catch them when they have nowhere to turn to.

I pray that this is not our scenario, because the only tool available to us, the Public Health Act was rendered inoperable through lies and disinformation. My opinion is that this was not for our "human rights" but an extension of an intellectual murder weapon. I hope you have seen.

Till next week.

Be the first to Write a Comment!

More News on allAfrica.com

Copyright © 2006 The Herald. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com). To contact the copyright holder directly for corrections — or for permission to republish or make other authorized use of this material, click here.

AllAfrica aggregates and indexes content from over 125 African news organizations, plus more than 200 other sources, who are responsible for their own reporting and views. Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica.

AllAfrica - All the Time

SELECT
SELECT

Topics