Catherine Riungu
1 May 2007
Nairobi — Kenya's horticultural exports have weathered a storm over carbon pollution and criticisms from human rights groups in Europe to increase volumes. Export earnings and market domination in the first quarter of 2007 are on the rise.
Latest figures released by the Kenya Flower Council show that the country's flower exports now control 32 per cent of the European Union market, consolidating the lead Kenya achieved in 2000 after edging out Israel and Columbia. This is a point above last year's 31 per cent, which the country attained after climbing from 25 per cent in 2003.
Although Britain's giant retailers, Tesco and Marks and Spencer, have rejected pleas to delay putting aeroplane symbols on imported products as indication of food miles to discourage consumers from purchasing goods whose transit to Europe pollute the environment, buyers seem not to have noticed.
According to a report of a meeting between Kenya's horticultural industry and representatives of the supermarkets, produce from Kenya fetched some Ksh68 million ($972,000) during the Easter weekend alone, signifying continued preference for Kenyan products.
The development has opened a new battle front with environmental and human rights activists accusing the retailers of being more interested in profits than environmental issues.
A Non-Governmental Organisation calling itself War on Want is asking consumers to boycott products from developing countries, particularly Kenya and Columbia where it says workers in flower farms are being exploited through underpayment and exposure to poisonous agrochemicals. The NGO also wants supermarkets to stop stocking products from the two countries.
The giant retailers have responded to growing concerns about climate change in the UK by placing the aeroplane stickers on air-freighted products. Tesco has announced plans to take this a step further by showing the total amount of carbon embedded in each product.
Kenya's High Commissioner in London Joseph Muchemi has criticised the continued labelling, which he says may lead to a boycott of such products. But according to Tesco, "our customers love Kenyan produce. There has been no reduction of sales but instead they seem to have gone up."
The supermarket assured a delegation of officials from the Horticultural Crops Development Authority, the Kenya Flower Council and the Export Promotion Council that the supermarkets have no intention of reducing imports from Kenya.
The country supplies 90 per cent of all cut roses, and cut spread carnations sold by the two retailers. Marks and Spencer, the second largest store after Tesco, sources 100 per cent of its green beans and 75 per cent of runner beans from Kenya.
This has shifted debate to whether UK retailers should put a plane symbol on imported produce from developing countries to indicate how many miles a product has travelled, to how effective the campaign is.
Studies indicate that Kenya's produce emit less carbon than those grown in Europe.
Although the retailers argued that the labelling was prompted by environmental concerns, fears have emerged that the carbon footprints and food miles policy could drastically reduce earnings and further fuel poverty in Africa.
The campaign aims at limiting consumption of products that require long-haul transport, specifically air-freighted goods, but this does not seem to have worked.
A recent study by UK's Cransfield University titled "Comparative Study of Cut Roses for the British Supermarkets Produced in Kenya and the Netherlands" conducted at Oserian Ltd, one of Kenya's largest flower firms shows that although air transport does have an environmental impact, air freights from Africa account for far less than one per cent of UK's greenhouse gas emissions.
The study was commissioned by the UK supermarket chain Sainsburys, World Flowers and the International Institute for Environment and Development.
According to Britain's International Development secretary Hilary Benn, consumers should not boycott products from developing countries based on the miles campaign.
"People want to buy ethically and do their bit for climate change, but often don't realise that they can support developing countries and reduce carbon emissions. Recent studies show that flowers flown from Africa can use less energy overall than those produced in Europe because they are not grown in heated greenhouses," he said.
He noted that overall, people living in the vast majority of African countries are responsible for a tiny amount of carbon emissions.
The study by the International Institute for Environment and Development found that yields in Kenya are double those produced in Netherlands due to the year-round sunshine.
The Tesco chief executive Terry Leahy has admitted that, " a product grown outdoors in a warm country and flown to the UK may have no higher carbon footprint than a product grown out-of-season in Europe in a heated greenhouse.
Kenya's horticultural exports have weathered a storm over carbon pollution and criticisms from human rights groups in Europe to increase volumes. Export earnings and market domination in the first quarter of 2007 are on the rise.
Latest figures released by the Kenya Flower Council show that the country's flower exports now control 32 per cent of the European Union market, consolidating the lead Kenya achieved in 2000 after edging out Israel and Columbia. This is a point above last year's 31 per cent, which the country attained after climbing from 25 per cent in 2003.
Although Britain's giant retailers Tesco and Marks and Spencer have rejected pleas to delay putting aeroplane symbols on imported products as indication of food miles to discourage consumers from purchasing goods whose transit to Europe pollute the environment, buyers seem not to have noticed.
According to a report of a meeting between Kenya's horticultural industry and representatives of the supermarkets, produce from Kenya fetched some Ksh68 million ($972,000) during the Easter weekend alone, signifying continued preference for Kenyan products.
The development has opened a new battle front with environmental and human rights activists accusing the retailers of being more interested in profits than environmental issues.
A Non-Governmental Organisation calling itself War on Want is asking consumers to boycott products from developing countries, particularly Kenya and Columbia where it says workers in flower farms are being exploited through underpayment and exposure to poisonous agrochemicals. The NGO also wants supermarkets to stop stocking products from the two countries.
The giant retailers have responded to growing concerns about climate change in the UK by placing the aeroplane stickers on air-freighted products. Tesco has announced plans to take this a step further by showing the total amount of carbon embedded in each product.
Kenya's High Commissioner in London Joseph Muchemi has criticised the continued labelling, which he says may lead to a boycott of such products. But according to Tesco, "our customers love Kenyan produce. There has been no reduction of sales but instead they seem to have gone up."
The supermarket assured a delegation of officials from the Horticultural Crops Development Authority, the Kenya Flower Council and the Export Promotion Council that the supermarkets have no intention of reducing imports from Kenya.
The country supplies 90 per cent of all cut roses, and cut spread carnations sold by the two retailers. Marks and Spencer, the second largest store after Tesco, sources 100 per cent of its green beans and 75 per cent of runner beans from Kenya.
This has shifted debate to whether UK retailers should put a plane symbol on imported produce from developing countries to indicate how many miles a product has travelled, to how effective the campaign is.
Studies indicate that Kenya's produce emit less carbon than those grown in Europe.
Although the retailers argued that the labelling was prompted by environmental concerns, fears have emerged that the carbon footprints and food miles policy could drastically reduce earnings and further fuel poverty in Africa.
The campaign aims at limiting consumption of products that require long-haul transport, specifically air-freighted goods, but this does not seem to have worked.
A recent study by UK's Cransfield University titled "Comparative Study of Cut Roses for the British Supermarkets Produced in Kenya and the Netherlands" conducted at Oserian Ltd, one of Kenya's largest flower firms shows that although air transport does have an environmental impact, air freights from Africa account for far less than one per cent of UK's greenhouse gas emissions.
The study was commissioned by the UK supermarket chain Sainsburys, World Flowers and the International Institute for Environment and Development.
According to Britain's International Development secretary Hilary Benn, consumers should not boycott products from developing countries based on the miles campaign.
"People want to buy ethically and do their bit for climate change, but often don't realise that they can support developing countries and reduce carbon emissions. Recent studies show that flowers flown from Africa can use less energy overall than those produced in Europe because they are not grown in heated greenhouses," he said.
He noted that overall, people living in the vast majority of African countries are responsible for a tiny amount of carbon emissions.
Be the first to Write a Comment!
Copyright © 2007 The East African. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com). To contact the copyright holder directly for corrections — or for permission to republish or make other authorized use of this material, click here.
AllAfrica aggregates and indexes content from over 125 African news organizations, plus more than 200 other sources, who are responsible for their own reporting and views. Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica.
