|
|
Sudan: U.N. Chief Visits Darfur Amid Ongoing Attacks
 |
 |
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
Inter Press Service (Johannesburg)
31 August 2007
Posted to the web 31 August 2007
Haider Rizvi
United Nations
Hopes for restoration of peace in the Sudanese region of Darfur appear to remain as distant as ever, although international efforts to resolve the four-year-long bloody conflict have recently intensified and U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon is now getting personally involved.
But as Ban prepares to embark on his first-ever trip to Sudan next week from Sep. 3-6, the official statements coming from Khartoum indicate that the mood there remains defiant and there are few indications of enthusiasm to cooperate with the international community.
On Tuesday, noting that violence in the Darfur region was on the rise, Ban said he was "deeply concerned" that early this month several hundred people had been killed in violent incidents, including an attack on a police station and air strikes on villages in south Darfur.
In response, the regime quickly sent a rebuke to Ban, saying that his statement was based on "fabricated news stories." The Sudanese government categorically denied reports about continued military operations in Darfur.
"These accusations are false and founded on made-up information from organisations and agencies with a political agenda," foreign ministry spokesman Ali al-Sadek told reporters. "The government hasn't had any military activities recently and the Sudanese army has no activities in Darfur."
Initially, the Sudanese government refused to accept the U.N. Security Council decision to deploy additional peacekeepers in the troubled region, but under international pressure eventually agreed to a 26,000-strong United Nations-African Union hybrid force in Darfur, most of which will be shaped by troops drawn from African nations.
A spokesman for Ban reiterated the U.N. position that violence was escalating and military operations were still going on in Darfur.
"These are established facts," said Yves Sorokobi. "We stand by our information."
Last week, the London-based human rights group Amnesty International released new photographs illustrating the Sudanese government's continued deployment of military equipment in Darfur despite the U.N. arms embargo and peace agreements.
"An embargo is only effective if it there are repercussions for defiance," said Larry Cox, Amnesty International USA's executive director. "The Security Council must strongly enforce this embargo immediately.
The photographs, sent to Amnesty International and the International Peace Information Service in Antwerp by eyewitnesses in Darfur, reinforce evidence provided in Amnesty's May 2007 report "Sudan: Arms continuing to fuel serious human rights violations in Darfur."
In Darfur, more than 200,000 people have been killed at least two million others displaced since 2003 when the armed conflict erupted between rebel groups from indigenous African tribes and Khartoum-backed Janjaweed militias.
Reports from the region suggest that in addition to civilians, many aid workers remain vulnerable to violent attacks by militias, which have continued since last September, when the Security Council first voted to send 20,000 U.N. troops to the region.
On Monday, Ban said he planned his trip to Sudan because he wanted to "see for myself the very difficult conditions" under which the proposed hybrid U.N.-African peacekeeping force will operate in Darfur.
He said the objective of his trip was "to underscore the peace agreement and to make progress in several areas related to Darfur -- hybrid force, the political process, humanitarian access and development of water sources."
Amid renewed calls for rapid deployment of troops, the civil society groups involved in humanitarian and peace efforts in Darfur welcomed Ban's decision to visit Sudan, although many of them seem unsure if the talks with the Omar al-Bashir government would produce positive results.
"It's critical to put pressure on the government," Marie Clark Brill of Africa Action, a Washington-based political pressure group that lobbies with the U.S. Congress on issues related to development in Africa, told IPS. "It's now time to put forward financial and logistical resources in place."
Like many other groups, Africa Action is demanding immediate deployment of troops in Darfur. "The peacekeeping operation is long overdue," she said, amid doubts about Sudan's promises to cooperate with the world community.
|
Scott Paul of Citizens for Global Solutions, another independent but influential policy think tank in Washington, offered similar views on Ban's trip to Khartoum.
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Make allAfrica.com your home page | RSS Feed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top | Site Guide | Who We Are | Advertising | Search | Subscribe | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Questions or Comments? Contact us. Read our Privacy Statement. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
