Use our pull-down menus to find more stories
  


OR subscribers use AllAfrica's premium search engine


Click here to read or make comments on this topic »

Mozambique: Disinformation On the Front Page


Agencia de Informacao de Mocambique (Maputo)
 

Email This Page

Print This Page

Comment on this article

View comments

Agencia de Informacao de Mocambique (Maputo)

17 December 2007
Posted to the web 17 December 2007

Paul Fauvet
Maputo

A shocking story splashed across the front page of the latest issue of the Maputo weekly "Zambeze": the country's new Attorney-General, Augusto Paulino, was, the paper claimed , the subject of a criminal investigation.

Inside the paper, page two was entirely devoted to the claim that Paulino is accused of stealing 300 million old meticais (about 12,500 US dollars) from the state. The article leads Zambeze readers to believe that Paulino used this money, supposedly stolen when he was presiding judge of the Maputo Provincial Court, to buy a house.

The source for the article is proceedings in the Supreme Court, where judge Joao Carlos Trindade had been appointed to investigate the case against Paulino. There was indeed such a case in August - but Trindade told AIM that neither the author of the article, Alvarito de Carvalho, nor anyone else on "Zambeze" had ever spoken to him.

And the article fails to give its readers the rather important detail that the charges against Paulino were dropped. Throughout the text, Carvalho seeks to give the impression that the case is ongoing and that President Armando Guebuza has appointed a man facing serious criminal charges as Attorney-General.

The allegations against Paulino were made immediately it became known that Guebuza wished to sack the former Attorney-General, Joaquim Madeira, and give Paulino the job. The timing certainly made it look as though the embezzlement charge was just a desperate move to stop Paulino becoming Attorney-General.

The matter first went to the Supreme Council of the Judicial Magistrature (CSMJ), the body responsible for disciplining judges, which set up a commission of inquiry. This investigated the allegation and found it entirely without merit. There was, in short, no evidence against Paulino.

But then the Attorney-General's office sent a formal criminal accusation against Paulino to the Supreme Court (the only court which can hear cases against senior judges). Somebody leaked a few select pieces from the hearings before Trindade to "Zambeze", and Carvalho obediently wrote them up.

The quotations in the "Zambeze" article come exclusively from Paulino's detractors. The evidence in his favour (including the fact that he contracted a bank loan to pay for his house) is omitted. So too, most shockingly, is the outcome.

Once Trindade's investigation was over, the prosecution dropped the charges. End of story.

For "Zambeze" to revive this case now, over three months later, is just a crude attempt to discredit Paulino. The article also includes the downright lie that, immediately after his appointment as Attorney-General, Paulino abolished the Central Office for the Fight Against Corruption (GCCC). In fact, even if he wanted to, Paulino could not abolish the GCCC, since it was established by law, and so can only be abolished by the country's parliament, the Assembly of the Republic.

What Paulino has done is try and make the GCCC work by stripping it of cases that do not fit the legal definition of corruption. He told a meeting of the Consultative Council of the Attorney-General's Office, held earlier this month, that the GCCC had to concentrate on its main task - so he had removed from the GCCC "cases of forgery, swindles, murders, and theft among others".

To date the GCCC has dashed the hopes of those who believed that it would be a useful instrument in the fight against corruption. Its investigations have not resulted in the prosecution of any serious act of corruption. It remains to be seen whether Paulino's insistence on a sharper focus will lead to better results.

This was not the first piece of disinformation "Zambeze" had carried against Paulino. On 8 November, the paper claimed that Paulino was illegally holding the posts of both Attorney-General and presiding judge of the Maputo City court, in violation of the principle that nobody can be a judge and a prosecutor at the same time.

The CSMJ was obliged to issue a statement denying the "Zambeze" story, pointing out that immediately on his appointment as Attorney-General Paulino ceased his duties as a judge, and for as long as he is Attorney-General his membership of the CSMJ itself is suspended.

Why should Paulino's rise spark resistance ? First, Paulino is one of the few judges who has struck a serious blow against organised crime in Mozambique. In January 2003, he sentenced to lengthy prison terms six men accused of the murder of investigative journalist Carlos Cardoso. They included two members of the notorious Abdul Satar crime family, and their accomplice, former bank manager Vicente Ramaya.

Relevant Links

Ramaya and members of the Satar family were also accused of defrauding the country's largest bank the BCM of the equivalent of 14 million dollars in 1996. This case was kept out of the courts for years, thanks to substantial corruption in the Attorney-General's Office in the late 1990s.

Page 1 of 212

Read comments. Write your own.
Author: nelsonleve

This article can be accepted only by readers that are not informed of the current issues related to Mozambique. For us, Mozambicans living in Mozambique it was not as "shoking" as Mr. Paul Fauvet made it. The corruption without faces is not shoking in Mozambique. Cases dropped is not shoking in Mozambique. Delay in the judicial process is not shoking in Mozambique. The paper does not say "stealing", it instead explain what happened and how. "There was indeed such a case in August..." It is not a made up story. The case was dropped just like many other cases involving... [Read Full Text]

Author: nelsonleve

Another articles has come up with substancial proofs of the case. Is that also a desinformation? Can Mr Paul Fauvet proof that Zambeze was wrong? That the case involving Augusto Paulino is a made up story?


AllAfrica aggregates and indexes content from over 125 African news organizations, plus more than 200 other sources, who are responsible for their own reporting and views. Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica.

 
Share this on:
Facebook
Digg
Del.icio.us
StumbleUpon
Muti


Make allAfrica.com your home page | RSS Feed

Top | Site Guide | Who We Are | Advertising | Search | Subscribe

Questions or Comments? Contact us. Read our Privacy Statement.

HOME
allAfrica.com


Relevant Links




Govt Loses $9 Million Annually
Govt House Accountant Shot Dead in Bayelsa
Gunmen Kill Accountant in Yenagoa
Attack On Gov. Orji Meant for Deputy -PDP
$16 Billion Probe - Panel Members in N100 Million Bribe Scandal





Today's Most Active Stories