|
|
Mauritius: Global Economy, Unequal Parallels
 |
 |
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
L'Express (Port Louis)
BOOK REVIEW
9 January 2008
Posted to the web 10 January 2008
By Nirmal Kumar Betchoo
Port Louis
The author looks into some of the factors that are triggering a change in the world economic outlook. He believes that Mauritius is under pressure to conform to this pattern of change.
With the increase in the price of oil, Mauritius is prospecting other areas like the production of ethanol, to sustain its energy requirements.
Boasted since the mid 1990s as the new world economic order, the global economy looks in a broad sense as a system which has favoured unequal parallels between the developing and the rich countries. To consider the world as a global village with greater commonness and lesser differences has so far revealed a dubious scenario.
Mauritius, in its present state of economic reform, faces unfair pressure to conform to the changing economic climate. The exogenous forces that compel the country to abide by certain conditions are already giving a headache both to the government and the population.
In the first instance, the price of oil and related commodities has increased two-fold from its precedent historical figure of $40 per barrel enough to make all the economies shiver under inflationary pressures along with the difficulty of managing such a basic resource in their domestic markets. Merrill Lynch, the international institutional investor, voices that there are reasons to believe that the oil price can reach $95 in a short time.
The dependence on oil has not really triggered affirmative responses from developing economies. Mauritius is busy prospecting alternate areas like the production of ethanol and the use of tidal energy to sustain its energy requirements.
However, these options remain at a primal stage without real development taking place in such areas. Paradoxically, the upward price shift in «light sweet crude» is not basically an influence of demand and supply conditions blown up by China but rather, external pressures like the Iraq crisis, natural calamities in the USA and consumption imbalances caused by the supply of lower priced oil by Venezuela and Nigeria.
Next comes the dependence of essential commodities known as consumer goods. The milk saga has caused enormous inconvenience both to buyers of milk powder and the local distributors. The plausible reason for the milk shortage coupled with a 50% increase in the price of different milk brands has been attributed to the low milk production level in Australia and New Zealand under a drought season characteristic of an Indian summer.
In this case, the importance and value of milk powder have been boosted up as luxuries, which directly impact upon the lower classes of people overly dependent on imported milk in Mauritius. This has been the trend since the termination of cattle rearing in rural areas and the near closure of milk production units in Palmar and Wolmar.
From all the corners, business people stress upon the fatality of rising prices and our inaptness to adapt and constantly change to the price inflation. As a developing economy, Mauritius now lifts up from its myopia to discover that it should have shed off its dependence on essential commodities by really inventing itself around the production of essential commodities.
New economic climate
Infinitesimal 2% milk production in the country and the pilot stage in the production of ethanol have powerfully stamped Mauritius into a servile economy tormented by winds of change from the global environment.
But where stands the unequal parallel of the global economy? While Mauritius has to make adjustments concerning an upward pressure on imported goods which finally make it inevitable to increase prices, the global environment remains unfair and disproportionately daunting. For example, the 36% reduction in price of sugar exports to the European Union (EU) is lesser perceived as an inevitable adjustment than the protectionist approach of the European continent.
Europe pursues its individual policies of economic reform by better subsidising European farmers of the beet and synthetic sugar and also relieving the confederation from the disaster of the mad-cow and the foot and mouth spectres. In this way, it also nurtures the significance of the already tattered European Referendum (2006).
In this new economic climate, the EU has made adjustments while disregarding the frail economic structures of African Caribbean Pacific (ACP) countries, among which, several are still subsistence economies with meagre monocrop cultures. The EU Commission on Agriculture now states that «the writings were on the wall» as a means of stopping any further negotiation on the price cut concerning cane sugar.
|
«While Mauritius has to make
adjustments concerning an upward
pressure on imported goods which
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Make allAfrica.com your home page | RSS Feed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top | Site Guide | Who We Are | Advertising | Search | Subscribe | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Questions or Comments? Contact us. Read our Privacy Statement. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
