Use our pull-down menus to find more stories
  


OR subscribers use AllAfrica's premium search engine


Click here to read or make comments on this topic »

Botswana: When 'Silent Diplomacy' Takes Hold


Mmegi/The Reporter (Gaborone)
 

Email This Page

Print This Page

Comment on this article

Mmegi/The Reporter (Gaborone)

EDITORIAL
14 March 2008
Posted to the web 17 March 2008

Gaborone

It is not surprising that the Southern African Development Community's Parliamentary Forum (SADC-PF) has not been invited to observe the presidential and parliamentary elections in Zimbabwe when that country goes to the polls on March 29.

During the last Zimbabwean poll in 2002, of all the SADC institutions, it was only the SADC-PF that gave an independent - and quite thorough - assessment of the parody that passed for an electoral process there. The forum saw the poll for the sham that it was and pointed out that the Mugabe-style election process had fallen far short of the Principles and Guidelines Governing Democratic Elections adopted by the regional political and economic bloc. In short, the elections were not free and fair, and SADC-PF said it.

How absurd then that all other SADC institutions, including our own government, should have given the process a clean bill of health? These institutions and governments actually went to great lengths to downplay the flaws of poll. It is noteworthy that perhaps of all SADC institutions, SADC-PF is the most representative of the region's people as it is made up of MPs from both ruling and opposition parties. Hence it boggles the mind that an institution that commands such credibility is denied the opportunity to observe the conduct of elections in a member country. What is even more intriguing is the silence of leading organs and structures of the organisation - particularly the Secretariat and the Organ on Politics, Defence and Security - in the face of this unacceptable imbroglio.

Under normal circumstances, the contribution of SADC-PF to the continued improvement of electoral processes of member states and its presence early when these processes unfold at election time should be sought after. If this is done, it follows that its pronouncements on the conduct of the elections should be taken seriously. SADC governments' inertia in the face of this naked rape of the democratic process could mean only one thing - the collective inaction is self-serving so that when the rigs to steal the poll are put in place at different times in the individual states, no-one is there to blow the whistle. Perhaps this is what happens when 'Silent Diplomacy' takes hold.

Relevant Links

But we take solace in the knowledge that at least one SADC institution has not sold its soul. As for the so-called Organ on Politics, Defence and Security, it will be running helter-skelter trying to effect crisis management when Zimbabwe burns after the poll. It is just a matter of time.



AllAfrica aggregates and indexes content from over 125 African news organizations, plus more than 200 other sources, who are responsible for their own reporting and views. Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica.

 
Share this on:
Facebook
Digg
Del.icio.us
StumbleUpon
Muti


Copyright © 2008 Mmegi/The Reporter. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com). To contact the copyright holder directly for corrections -- or for permission to republish or make other authorized use of this material, click here.

Make allAfrica.com your home page | RSS Feed

Top | Site Guide | Who We Are | Advertising | Search | Subscribe

Questions or Comments? Contact us. Read our Privacy Statement.

HOME
allAfrica.com


Relevant Links




MP Condemns Government Secrecy, Calls for Freedom of Information Legislation
Moathlaping Returns for Cosmos Try-Out
Is Our Government Increasingly Being Run By Decrees?
Media Position Paper On Media Practitioners Bill
Diamond Sales Up Ten Percent Despite U.S. Slump





Today's Most Active Stories