Johannesburg — SO THE battle of Cuito Cuanavale is to become a tourist site. May I suggest a slogan? Southern Angola -- Alive with Ambiguity. It will be interesting to see what the plaques say.
I wonder whether they will reflect what Fidel Castro told the Cuban Council of State on July 9 1989, a year after the hostilities ended. It is not a version that reflects particularly well on anyone except, of course, Castro himself.
His purpose in addressing the council that day was to endorse the death sentence imposed on Gen Arnaldo Ochoa Sanchez, Cuba's top commander in Angola from 1987 until his summons home in 1989 to face charges of drug-running. For obvious reasons, the portrayal of Ochoa is not flattering. The Angolans and their Soviet allies do not come off so well either. In fact, as the story opens in late 1987, they are in headlong retreat, smashed by the South African Defence Force, Unita and their own ineptitude, after a lumbering thrust at the Unita base camp, Jamba.
"Everyone was asking us to do something," Castro recalled. He, as ever, was decisive amid the panic. "We ourselves understood that even though we were in no way responsible for the errors that had led to the situation, we could not sit still and allow a military and political catastrophe to occur.... Many problems had to be solved."
These included the paucity of lead in everyone else's pencil. The fleeing Angolan army had paused at Cuito Cuanavale, but, in Castro's telling, would have scarpered on north with Ochoa's blessing had he not overruled the joint command in Luanda and taken charge himself.
He describes the frustrations of trying to command Angolans from Havana. They simply would not close up their defensive line, with the result the South Africans were able to slice through and pin them against the Cuito River. Only a Cuban counterattack, so we are told, preserved them from annihilation.
And after that, it was Cuban leadership that stabilised the line, saving Cuito Cuanavale, and freeing up Fidel for the real masterstroke: a grand demonstration of martial intent towards the Namibian border through Cunene province, which, we are told, finally convinced PW Botha to say basta.
The Angolans, whose sovereignty Cuba was nominally there to protect, do not feature heavily in Fidel's narrative at this point. Absent is any mention of Umkhonto we Sizwe.
Castro's version of events served a purpose, as all legends do. It enabled him to pull his troops out of Angola with honour intact, even enhanced, while disgracing one of his greatest generals, who, for reasons still unclear, he wanted dead.
The ironies abound. Castro could declare victory and bug out looking like a hero because of a bargain framed by Ronald Reagan's Metternich in Africa, Chester Crocker. SA would leave Namibia if Cuba left Angola. Fidel understood he could don the laurels for Namibian independence so long as he could first persuade the world he had saved Angola. A credulous world bit.
A corollary of the deal, which Castro readily accepted once his own glory was secure, was the ANC's ignominious expulsion from Angola. One day, when it is a matter of purely academic interest, we may reach a consensus on what happened at Cuito Cuanavale. Today, perhaps, it is still too much of a Rorschach test.
As I look at it now, I would say Castro played his hand in Angola extremely well. As always, he punched way above his weight. He exploited opportunities. He did not get hung up on sophomoric solidarities, let alone anything so bourgeois as the truth. He demonstrated his great strategic gift. He marketed himself and Cuba brilliantly.
He has always been a master at that. He's had to kill of lot of people, one way or another, along the way. Others he's had to torture and re-educate. I wouldn't say, having been there several times, that Cubans are the happiest people on earth. But you have to love the way Castro's communism keeps the proletariat off the nicer beaches.
Barber is US country manager for the International Marketing Council.

Comments 1 to 1 of 1 Post a comment
I just completed a round trip to Cuito by road and was there for the 23 March celebrations. Simon Barber completely misses the point. Von Clauswitz once wrote that 'war is politics by other means'. War is not about how many enemy soldiers and equipment you destroy, it is simply not cricket. If we look a the geo-politics if Southern Africa after March 1988 we see a rapid collapse of the South African Laager in Namibia with the 'frontier' suddenly narrowing down not to some international border but to the border between the townshipos and the suburbs. The MPLA is still in power in Angola, SWAPO is in power in Namibia, and the ANC is in power in South Africa.
The Vietcong lost far more soldiers in Vietnam than the United States, yet the Vietcong won the war. We could say the same about Algeria, Mocambique and Rhodesia. My question to Simon Barber and his ilk is: when is the white male ego going to accept that white racial domination and occupaion of territories where black and yellow people are native majorities will be resisted to the death?
Since its inception, Cuba has played a supportive role in African independence struggles. Support ranged from doctors and teachers to military personnel, from Guinea to Ethiopia, and from Algeria to Angola. Perhaps the most decisive support was to Angola in its post-independence war with apartheid South Africa. The battle of Cuito-Cuanavale was a major turning point in southern Africas defeat of the apartheid regime.
No amount of denial will change the political outcome of the battle of Cuito Canavale. Africans know and appreciate this. Those who resent the defeat of their racial dominance and illegal occupation of the lands of others rue it.