Ng'ang'a Mbugua
26 April 2008
opinion
Nairobi — For decades, Kerio Valley and the adjoining areas have been rocked by intermittent ethnic violence but they have never produced an internal refugee. Yet Eldoret, Kericho, Kuresoi, Molo, Nakuru and the surrounding areas produced hundreds of thousands of displaced people after less than six weeks of post-election violence.
What is the difference between these two sets of volatile regions in the Rift Valley? The answer is simple; in Kerio, the communities exercise their constitutional right to self-defence.
But the rest of the country frowns on the communities for observing this basic rule that guarantees their survival in an environment in which life would be "nasty, brutish and short," as British philosopher Thomas Hobbes so famously observed.
The only times the communities abandon their homes is when they have to look for water for themselves and their large herds of livestock.
President Kibaki and Prime Minister Raila Odinga are seeking the wrong remedy for a simple malady. They can solve the internal refugee crisis once and for all by getting their lieutenants in Parliament to vote in favour of easing restrictions on the legal ownership of firearms.
This would give the public the power to exercise the right guaranteed by section 71 (2a) of the Constitution, which allows wananchi to use force in protection of their lives and property.
The only reason parts of the Rift Valley have spawned refugees is that unarmed people were confronted by militias, some of whom they had lived with as neighbours for years.
The law of the jungle has taught the antelope to lie low or create a distance between it and its aggressive, carnivorous neighbours. Although this law may serve the antelope well, it is untenable in a modern society as aptly shown by people who fled from their homes. In any case, people are political animals and it is difficult for them to adopt their neighbours' political morality.
It is curious that in a capitalistic country such as Kenya, not even one voice has called for an overhaul of the security system, yet it failed to protect the two fundamental values that capitalistic societies hold dear - the right to life and property. Capitalists hold this truth to be self-evident - that an attack on property is an attack on life.
Since the disciplined forces failed to discharge their mandate after the disputed elections, this responsibility should be privatised. After all, experience has shown that privatising failed or failing public institutions usually injects professionalism and efficiency into them. There is no reason why this cannot be replicated in the provision of security. If in doubt, ask the Kerio Valley residents.
In the past, critics of liberalising access to firearms have argued that they would put ordinary people's lives in peril because even squabbles in the streets or the bedroom would be resolved by bullets.
Incidentally, such incidents are few and far between in the Kerio Valley despite the easy accessibility of AK- 47s as well as the relatively low levels or education and social sophistication.
Even in the disciplined forces, the cases are so few as to be insignificant. Incidentally, in Kerio Valley, the AK- 47 plays a vital role in maintaining social, economic and political equilibriums.
Therefore, easing civilians' access to firearms would not only eradicate internally displaced people, but also boost crop production and avert the looming food shortage that has been aggravated by groups that cherish land more for its ornamental and sentimental value than its production importance.
If Kenya is to achieve long-lasting stability, it ought to borrow a leaf from the US, whose constitution gives the people the right to bear arms and form militias for their own defence should the armed forces fail them, as happened in Kenya after the December elections.
Read comments. Write your own.
Copyright © 2008 The Nation. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com). To contact the copyright holder directly for corrections — or for permission to republish or make other authorized use of this material, click here.
AllAfrica aggregates and indexes content from over 125 African news organizations, plus more than 200 other sources, who are responsible for their own reporting and views. Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica.
This article represents forward thinking in my opinion. I am Kenyan by birth and am always saddened by the amount of violence Kenyans can endure or emit.
I strongly think all Kenyans should bear arms.This will level the playing field and provide a sense of security which the government fails to afford citizens.Guns or no guns,there is violence around the world.If everybody in a given area was armed,would be attackers will think twice before invading.That could save lives and property.
I magine how many rapes,night attacks by thugs and police,etc can be thwarted.The kenyan government is an enabler of insecurity by restricting gun ownership in the face of unbriddled violence. My family's farm was attacked and burned for no reason.Had they had guns,they could have repelled the thugs.
Imagine,a police officer or anybody could not easly attack you if they think you are armed,even here in the US.Carrying a concealed weapon or an exposed one is a life saving act that every human being should be able to enjoy.Just get the guns legally registered and collect taxes and fees.
I don't think I need to quote statistics to make my case.Every Kenyan knows what is going on or not.We are regressing and losing lifes daily!
To support this writer,I come armed with general life experience,a Bachelor of Arts in Criminal Justice,a Master of Arts in Business and Organizational Security Management and an MBA in progress.