Use our pull-down menus to find more stories
  


OR subscribers use AllAfrica's premium search engine


Click here to read or make comments on this topic »

South Africa: FXI Disappointed With Ginwala Enquiry Ruling


 

Email This Page

Print This Page

Comment on this article

Visit The Publisher's Site

Biz-Community (Cape Town)

9 May 2008
Posted to the web 9 May 2008

The Freedom of Expression Institute (FXI) has expressed its disappointed with the refusal earlier this week by Dr Frene Ginwala, chairperson of the enquiry into the suspension of Vusi Pikoli, head of the NDPP, to entertain representations by e.tv's counsel K Hofmeyr that the broadcaster be allowed to make representations before she closes any session of the hearing.

According to the FXI, Ginwala's ruling effectively means that if neither of the parties to the proceedings, namely the Government or Pikoli, oppose ad hoc applications for certain evidence to be heard in camera, which the chairperson indicated she would entertain, the hearing of such evidence will be held behind closed doors. The media, as a third party, will not be given a hearing in this regard, which may well result in the suppression of information which is of fundamental public importance.

"We believe that the public has an overriding right to know about matters of such fundamental significance and that third party intervention in order to oppose segments of the hearing being held in camera should be heard," said the FXI's Melissa Moore, Law Clinic head, in a media statement.

Relevant Links

"While we are aware that the Chairperson's mandate is limited to the gathering of information in this matter, we believe that the exposure of all information relevant to the enquiry should be open to the scrutiny of the public. The public has a right to know whether the President and/or the Minister of Justice were intervening in order to protect the Commissioner of Police, particularly since subsequent revelations have indicated that there is a possibility that the Commissioner has at least a prima facie case to answer.

"Given the extent and the fundamental importance of the key positions which Adv Pikoli and his adversaries hold, the public is entitled to know the full details. The suppression of this kind of information will inevitability lead to an increased climate of distrust in the probity of the actions of the President, the Minister of Justice and Adv Pikoli.

Concluded Moore, "It is imperative that the media come together to oppose the exclusionary attitude that the Enquiry has adopted towards reasonable and legitimate third party interests in the proceedings."



AllAfrica aggregates and indexes content from over 125 African news organizations, plus more than 200 other sources, who are responsible for their own reporting and views. Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica.

 
Share this on:
Facebook
Digg
Del.icio.us
StumbleUpon
Muti


Copyright © 2008 Biz-Community. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com). To contact the copyright holder directly for corrections -- or for permission to republish or make other authorized use of this material, click here.

Make allAfrica.com your home page | RSS Feed

Top | Site Guide | Who We Are | Advertising | Search | Subscribe

Questions or Comments? Contact us. Read our Privacy Statement.

HOME
allAfrica.com


Relevant Links




Bulawayo Court Overturns Police Ban of MDC Rally
Mugabe Fires Attorney General Gula-Ndebele
Task Team to Probe Attacks
Zuma Trial Likely to Start Early Next Year
May Day Celebrations - Youths Want Jailed February Demonstrators Pardoned