Use our pull-down menus to find more stories
  


OR subscribers use AllAfrica's premium search engine


Click here to read or make comments on this topic »

South Africa: Competition Law


Business Day (Johannesburg)
 

Email This Page

Print This Page

Comment on this article

Business Day (Johannesburg)

EDITORIAL
13 May 2008
Posted to the web 13 May 2008

Johannesburg

IT IS ironic, in a way, that proposed amendments to SA's competition law are to go to the cabinet just as the Competition Commission is reporting ever richer successes in busting cartels.

Last week Tiger Brands subsidiary Adcock Ingram Critical Care agreed to pay a R53,5m penalty for collusion in the supply of intravenous drips to hospitals. That comes after Tiger reached a R98,8m settlement with the commission over collusion in the bread industry.

The bread cartel case has now been referred to the Competition Tribunal, which is also due to start hearing the milk industry cartel case later this year. Meanwhile the commission is investigating possible cartels in industries such as construction and food. And it's due to report soon on its probe of pricing in the banking industry.

Relevant Links

So the competition authorities can hardly be said to be powerless to tackle collusion and price-fixing. Indeed, they seem to be doing a rather good job of it -- too good, some in business might wail.

Why then does the government seem to think they need additional powers? The Sunday Times reports the new bill provides for much increased fines. These have the potential to bankrupt the companies involved, removing competitors from the market -- hardly a good thing. The bill will also allow company directors to be held personally liable, exposing them to fines or jail terms. That will surely make any company director think twice about collusion, but it could also make her or him think twice about being a director at all -- and we are short of skilled and experienced directors as it is.

Then there's provision, reportedly, for the commission to initiate its own investigations rather than simply waiting for complaints. But the commission hardly seems to be sitting back and waiting, and it already has such powers. It may not have enough capacity and skill to do more and better investigations. But that must be remedied by boosting the institutions, not changing the law. In proposing changes, the government must take care not to do competition more harm than good.



AllAfrica aggregates and indexes content from over 125 African news organizations, plus more than 200 other sources, who are responsible for their own reporting and views. Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica.

 
Share this on:
Facebook
Digg
Del.icio.us
StumbleUpon
Muti


Copyright © 2008 Business Day. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com). To contact the copyright holder directly for corrections -- or for permission to republish or make other authorized use of this material, click here.

Make allAfrica.com your home page | RSS Feed

Top | Site Guide | Who We Are | Advertising | Search | Subscribe

Questions or Comments? Contact us. Read our Privacy Statement.

HOME
allAfrica.com


Relevant Links




G8 Leaders Must Pinpoint Aid Bottlenecks
Health Workers Call Off Strike
Niger Delta Leaders Reject Summit on Future
South African Unions Protest Against Mugabe
Pipeline Vandals Threaten Energy, Says Oil Firm