Use our pull-down menus to find more stories
  


OR subscribers use AllAfrica's premium search engine


Click here to read or make comments on this topic »

Nigeria: The Nnamani Example


This Day (Lagos)
 

Email This Page

Print This Page

Comment on this article

This Day (Lagos)

COLUMN
14 May 2008
Posted to the web 14 May 2008

Kayode Komolafe
Lagos

There are great lessons to learn from the rising profile of former Senate President Ken Nnamani. The rise has been steady since he left office a year ago. His profile is a profound testimony to the fact that amid the cloud that often envelopes the perennial discussion of the leadership question, a silver lining comes up, once in a while, on the horizon.

We must take adequate notice of such a development.

Only last week, he launched the Ken Nnamani Centre for Leadership and Development (KNCLD). Among the leaders who honoured the occasion with their eminent presence were former Head of State, General Yakubu Gowon, former President Shehu Shagari, former President Ibrahim Babangida and former Head of State, General Abdulsalami Abubakar. Others were former Ghanaian President Jerry Rawlings, former United States Ambassador to Nigeria, Howard Jeter and a host of legislators, governors and ministers. It was a gathering that was quite appropriate for a reflection on the issues of leadership. In fact, Gowon, Rawlings and Jeter reportedly gave their own important perspectives on leadership. It was refreshing listening to those who have had the opportunity of exercising power reflecting on leadership and what it entails. Nnamani seems serious about the project, which he says is not going to be profit making, but will serve to promote common good. To accomplish this he needs N3.5 billion. The ambition is quite laudable and the goodwill already generated, going by the list of those who have embraced the concept, is an evidence that Nnamani is embarking on a worthwhile experiment.

However, what make the new centre remarkable are the deeper lessons it offers to those in public offices.

The first lesson is that after tenure as a political office holder, there are other productive ways of rendering public service. To be of service (if indeed people hold political offices to render service in Nigeria), one does not have to hang on desperately to power or destroy institutions to perpetuate him in power. It is also a rebuke to those who insist on circulating themselves in the corridors of power not minding the relevance of the appointments they are offered. In other words there is life after political office.

Secondly, the Nnamani story shows that when in power, the leader must know when to seize historical moments and make a difference. A misstep can be decisive for the career of a leader. Nnamani is walking tall on the political landscape today because he presided over the senate when the moves to manipulate the constitution to extend the tenure of former President Olusegun Obasanjo for a third term were checkmated. He would not be talking of a leadership centre today if he had been corralled into the 'third term project". He stood out simply by sticking to principle and ensuring that the rules were followed. It was simply a matter of keeping fidelity with his oath of office. If he were to be a character without a sense of mission, the matter would not, however, be so simple. The perversion of the people's will would, of course, be rationalised on the grounds of "stability", "continuity" 'expediency' and other opportunistic appropriations. Yes, Nnamani gave the senate a good leadership by ensuring its institutional integrity and independence. But if he had taken a wrong step with the third- term politics, he could have rubbished his whole tenure. He has a voice today that decent people are willing to listen to simply because he read the people's mood correctly in 2006 and seized the moment appropriately to distinguish himself as a leader. An historical moment can make or mar a leader and there may not be a second chance to correct mistakes.

Thirdly, Nnamani is making a significant contribution by deepening the culture of thinking about our problems. Every analyst of Nigeria's developmental debacle invariably comes to the conclusion that the factor of leadership is central to overcoming the problems. What is often not stated is that a lot more of thinking ought to go into the process? There is need for more thinking on the part of those who formulate and articulate policies. There is a great of thinking to be done by those who appraise these policies for the purpose of offering alternatives. It is often presumed that the reality facing us has been sufficiently defined. This may not be so after all. Indeed, the vicious cycle of development that the nation finds itself may in itself be a consequence of inadequate definition of the Nigerian condition. For adequate definition of the problem, a lot of thinking is required beyond the casual appreciation of events which passes for a national discourse at present.

So, those who make efforts to create institutions to be devoted to serious reflections on the problems should be encouraged. The sort of centre Nnamani is embarking upon should help in structuring the debates and give some depth into analysis of issues.

Relevant Links

Fourthly, it is noteworthy that the centre is focusing on "transformational leadership". The Nigerian condition requires more than nebulous reforms. For decades, different regimes and administrations have fashioned various brands of reforms, employing fanciful acronyms. If it is possible to clinically feel the pulse of the socio-economic and political system, it should be suffering from reform-fatigue by now. It is often forgotten by our reform advocates that a reform is not supposed to be an endless exercise. It must have targets and benchmarks. It should be possible to locate at which point in time the reform has achieved its purpose. Over time, the qualitative effect of cumulative reforms ought to be transformation. In any case, the Nigerian situation is direly in need of transformation. The solution to worsening mass poverty is the transformation in the quality of lives of the people. The collapse in health, education, infrastructure and other sectors makes transformation very urgent. Since one of the important functions of leadership is to give direction and mobilise the people and resources towards the identified direction, the leadership needed is the one that can give direction towards transformation.

Page 1 of 212


AllAfrica aggregates and indexes content from over 125 African news organizations, plus more than 200 other sources, who are responsible for their own reporting and views. Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica.

 
Share this on:
Facebook
Digg
Del.icio.us
StumbleUpon
Muti


Make allAfrica.com your home page | RSS Feed

Top | Site Guide | Who We Are | Advertising | Search | Subscribe

Questions or Comments? Contact us. Read our Privacy Statement.

HOME
allAfrica.com


Relevant Links




Militants Warn of 'Uncontrollable Violence'
Tribunal Appoints Challenger as State Governor
Several Killed in Fuel Tanker Explosion
President Halts Arrest of Former Governor Over Power Probe
Govt Says al-Bashir's Indictment Ill-Timed





Today's Most Active Stories