allAfrica.com: Zimbabwe: Muckraker - Blessed Are Those Who Travel On Zhing-Zhongs (Page 1 of 3)

A RATHER confused message coming from The Post in Zambia. Just as thousands of Zimbabweans are suffering a terrible onslaught from Zanu PF as punishment for voting for the opposition, the newspaper publishes an editorial attacking the MDC for its Western links.

Opposition leaders had every right to campaign to remove President Mugabe, the editorial said, "but it's treacherous for them to do so on the back of national failure".

So let's get this straight: if Mugabe's disastrous policies and populist posturing have brought the country to a state of collapse, it is "treacherous" to say so?

This is the sort of misplaced nationalist nonsense that has contributed to the structural failure of states like Zambia and Zimbabwe. Instead of responding ourselves lest we be accused of harbouring an imperialist agenda, let's provide space for the Progressive Teachers Union of Zimbabwe (PTUZ), an affiliate of the ZCTU, which last weekend took out full-page advertisements to acquaint the public with the plight of teachers in outlying areas who have been the targets of Mugabe's thugs.

"We are very disappointed by the manner in which our African brothers and sisters have handled the Zimbabwean crisis," the PTUZ said. "Zimbabweans are made of flesh and blood; they do not need Westerners to tell them that they are being beaten. Sadc and the AU must stop chasing the shadow of the imperialist ghost and listen to what the majority of Zimbabweans are saying. When our nationalist leaders say they are reclaiming land from the white minority we take it that the land is needed for farming and not to bury us when we die of hunger and politically motivated violence."

Equally confused is Patrick Chinamasa who says government will not invite Western observers to monitor the presidential run-off unless sanctions are removed.

First of all, what is a ruling-party official doing setting the rules for an electoral contest in which their leader is a player? This is once again a case of the candidate becoming the referee. Secondly, according to the Sadc Mauritius protocol on elections, it should be the function of the electoral commission to determine which observers it wants to invite, not the regime which has an interest in securing a favourable coverage.

The Zimbabwe Electoral Commission has already proved itself deeply compromised. By allowing Chinamasa to arrogate to government the role of setting rules, imposing conditions and handpicking observers, the commission is further abdicating responsibility for the conduct of the run-off.

Already we have seen a Zimbabwean editor arrested for carrying opinions by an opposition leader that are deemed prejudicial to the state and to judges, even though those opinions form part of the public discourse. And trade union leaders are incarcerated for criticising the regime on Workers Day, May 1. They were denied bail when there was no danger of them absconding.

Chinamasa has previously said we have the right to criticise judges but that was when the judiciary was considered hostile to Zanu PF's machinations!

Foreign journalists have been prosecuted for covering the first round without accreditation even though Aippa was amended after inter-party talks to remove provisions on compulsory accreditation.

Everywhere there is evidence of state intrusion which will intensify now Mugabe is seen as vulnerable to defeat. The small clique around him that believe he was deprived of victory by a Western plot and MDC manipulation now want to make sure they control the electoral process more effectively.

As for sanctions, it does not appear to have dawned on Chinamasa that there will be no change there until the state puts a stop to violence. Sanctions were imposed in response to the violence and electoral manipulation that surrounded elections in 2000 and 2002. Now the state has unleashed the same dogs of war, it thinks the West will simply fold its arms and watch.

That will not happen. International opinion is appalled by reports from organisations such as the Zimbabwe Association of Doctors for Human Rights which have documented the terrible injuries people have suffered for daring to oppose Zanu PF or because members of their families dared to vote against the ruling party.

Journalists in the state media seem unable to report facts on the ground without spinning the story so it is unrecognisable alongside the original version.

The visit by US ambassador James McGee and other diplomats to a hospital in Chiweshe on Tuesday provides a good example. Here is the Reuters version: "The United States condemned Zimbabwe's government on Tuesday for its 'harassment' of the US ambassador and other diplomats questioned by police after visiting post-election violence victims at a hospital.

"The diplomats were on their way back from visiting a rural hospital to see victims of post-election violence. They were also held up at the hospital and questioned by security officials over their reasons for being there...".

web allafrica.com	Enter your search terms	Submit search form
OR subscribers use AllAfrica's premium search engine


Use our pull-down menus to find more stories

Today's Most Active Stories