This Day (Lagos)

Nigeria: G8 Worried Over Country's Nuclear Programme

Onyebuchi Ezigbo

30 June 2008


Abuja — Nigeria's nuclear programme is causing concern among the world's Group of Eight (G8) nations, THISDAY has learnt.

The G8 - comprising world's most industrialised democracies, the United States (US), United Kingdom (UK), Japan, Russia, Italy, France, Germany and Canada - is worried about Nigeria's ability to handle the safety and security obligations associated with use of nuclear technology.

The US has been leading the campaign against uranium enrichment for nuclear technology by Iran and North Korea, and although Nigeria's nuclear programme is purely for power generation, the G8 nations are said to be uncomfortable with it.

Confirming this to THISDAY, the Director-General of the Nigeria Nuclear Regulatory Agency (NNRA), Professor Shamsedeen Elegba, said the G8 countries had expressed their concerns over the country's readiness to fulfil safety and security obligations associated with the establishment of nuclear power plant in the country.

The D-G, who spoke to THISDAY at the end of a week-long capacity training programme on nuclear energy safety issues, said though the countries agreed that Nigeria needed nuclear power plant for electricity purposes, the concerns are whether the country could adequately ensure safe and secure deployment of the facility.

"Most of them are cynical about our level of safety and some even question our level of responsibility because it is something that just one little mistake, everybody is affected," he said.

In April 1986, there was a nuclear reactor accident in the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in the old Soviet Union, regarded as the worst in history, resulting in a severe release of radioactivity into the environment following a massive power excursion which destroyed the reactor.

Thirty people died in the explosion, but further explosions and the resulting fire sent a plume of highly radioactive fallout into the atmosphere and over an extensive geographical area, including western Soviet Union, Europe and as far as eastern North America.

Large areas in Ukraine, Belarus and Russia were highly contaminated, leading to the evacuation and resettlement of over 336,000 people.

The 2005 report prepared by the Chernobyl Forum, led by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and World Health Organisation (WHO), attributed 56 direct deaths - 47 accident workers, and nine children with thyroid cancer - and estimated 4,000 extra deaths due to cancer among the approximately 600,000 most highly exposed and 5,000 among the six million living nearby.

Speaking on whether the reservation expressed by the world powers would affect Nigeria's nuclear energy ambition, Elegga said they were only concerned about safety issues which the country was trying hard to address.

"What everybody is worried about is the level of safety because the nuclear industry is highly regulated, just like the aviation sector. It is highly regulated because one accident is too many and therefore everybody is particularly worried about our levels of preparedness, especially the regulatory authorities. They want to be sure that all uses, whether within the country or being transported in and out of the country, are appropriately provided for in terms of safety," he said.

Elegba said Nigeria had made significant progress in the area of safety efforts, adding that the country had ratified the convention on nuclear safety which meant that "we are bound to comply with all the requirements for safety of nuclear installations in the country. We are also a party to the convention of physical protection of nuclear materials and installation which makes it mandatory on us".

He said Nigeria was also reviewing her laws to make sure that adequate resources were made available to ensure safety and security of nuclear materials in the country.

The D-G said the target date for establishment of nuclear power plant would be determined after an agreement on the supply of the reactor had been reached with the producers.

"It is after an agreement has been signed with suppliers of nuclear reactors that NNRA can be in a position to issue licence as to where the plant can be sited as well as the design of the building," he said.

According to him, part of the role of NNRA was to also issue licence for the commissioning and decommissioning of the nuclear power plant.

He said the lifespan of most nuclear power plants is usually 50 years, and the authority is empowered to ensure that adequate preparations are made on how to dismantle the nuclear facility at expiration.

The licence would stipulate among other conditions how to manage the radioactive wastes that come with it.

The D-G said the training programme was meant for front line officers from the various security organisations on safety and security of radioactive and nuclear materials.

Elegba explained that owing to the general concern on nuclear safety, NNRA was emphasising the need to have a Memorandum of Understanding with participating agencies so as to facilitate the integration of safety programmes into the curriculum of various training courses.

"We are working with the security agencies and organisations over the past seven years to ensure that radioactive sources imported, used or transported within the country are kept safe. One of the responsibilities of NNRA is to help improve the competencies of these security organisations," he said.

He said the first step was to provide them with adequate monitoring tools and then to have an MoU signed between them and NNRA, so that at the end of the day, nuclear safety would be part of the topics to be covered by the agencies in their training schools.

Read comments. Write your own.

Copyright © 2008 This Day. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com). To contact the copyright holder directly for corrections — or for permission to republish or make other authorized use of this material, click here.

AllAfrica aggregates and indexes content from over 125 African news organizations, plus more than 200 other sources, who are responsible for their own reporting and views. Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica.

Author: Jude
Tue Jul 1 18:22:44 2008

Nigeria has no need at this sate of our development, to pursue energy from nuclear sources. Our vast gas reserves, coupled with Associated gas from oil drilling is enough to meet not only our electricity needs, but the entire West Africa sub-region. In fact, we flare over two billion cubic feet of gas daily. Recently, President of Nigerian Gas Association (NGA), Engr. Chris Ogiemwonyi at the NGA's 2nd quarter business forum in Abuja, said that Nigeria lost about $72 billion to gas flaring at an average of $2.5 billion per annum between 1970 and 2006. If we cannot tap the… [Read Full Text]

Author: kessyjc
Tue Jul 1 06:05:45 2008

Well,

I would not mind being the voice that cries out in the wilderness on this issue. The idea of an electro-nuclear programme is a very bad one at this stage in our development. Again, those proposing this idea should BEWARE. WE ARE LOOKING FOR MORE TROUBLE THAN WE CAN HANDLE IN THE ENTIRE COUNTRY. OGA YAR'ADUA, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, DO NOT DO THIS. AT THIS STAGE IN OUR DEVELOPMENT, IT IS VERY UNSAFE. IT IS LIKE A CHILD PLAYING WITH FIRE. I HAVE HEARD THE IGBOS QUOTE THE WORDS OF THE CHICK CAPTURED BY A KITE: "I AM… [Read Full Text]

Author: chokora
Tue Jul 1 06:31:06 2008

Hey buddy, relax. You drink too much palm wine too much. Or is too much okra u na chop?

There was a time that whisky was said to be too strong for the mind of the African native.

Some may think that driving a car is too dangerous for the African.

Have no fear: Nigeria will not call upon you to design a nuclear plant for the people. There are many Nigerians/Africans well-versed in that area. Some even teach nuclear engineering design courses in leading western universities and some in Nigeria's diaspora work in the area.

Author: 'The Zima'W3
Tue Jul 1 09:58:07 2008

At the risk of being provocative it must be said that Kessyjc is an articulate voice of the 'Africa and Africans' of yesteryear,and gives expression to the fears doubts insecurities and complexes of a 'colonilized mindset'He inhabits a world in which we Africans are persuaded that we are incapable of addressing our needs or running our own affairs without guidance from others and that we have some unique flaw which somehow prevents us from commanding and directing our own destiny....And it is this distorted and warped perception that the process of our mental, Cultural Political and economic decolinzation must address… [Read Full Text]

Author: Jean
Tue Jul 1 19:36:10 2008

Neither should we always use the "either/or" reasoning everytime anyone questions us.We Africans are able to do many things but we resort to the cheap "colonization excuse" when confronted with challenges. Nigeria as a giant in Africa has squandered so many opportunities in the past that it's quite reasonable to question its ability to manage a nuclear program.For instance, with all its oil and other natural resources,Nigeria is neither able to secure them nor provide refinery capacity to the west african market and as a result we import refined oil. You need to convince us that if you can't do… [Read Full Text]

Author: kessyjc
Wed Jul 2 05:12:40 2008

Jesus and John the Baptizer also did not know what the heck they were talking about. In the eyes of some of their fellows they were crazy. According to the Christians, the same things happened to the prophets sent to warn Israel, and, of course, also to Socrates.

But, my fellows, history proved all of them--these crazies--right. Of course, it is only time that will tell who is right, but, Ogun knows that, by then, it would be too late to turn back the tide.

And Sorry chokro, I no dey drink anything wey de enter for head and for… [Read Full Text]

Author: mazianyaogu
Thu Jul 10 19:21:06 2008

WE ARE NOW IN THE NUCLEAR AGE,AND WE CANNOT ISOLATE NIGERIA.WHY ARE THE G8 WORRIED ABOUT OUR OPTING FOR NUCLEAR ENERGY? THE GOVT HAS SELECTED 13 UNIVERSITIES IN THE COUNTRY TO STUDY THE NUCLEAR OPTION.THIS IS THE TREND IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION.ALL OF THE G8 NATIONS HAVE THE NUCLEAR ENERGY TO SUPPORT THEIR ENERGY PROGRAMS WHY CAN"T WE DO THE SAME?.AFTER ALL,WHEN USA STARTED THEIR NUCLEAR OPTION THEY HAD NO PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE.IT WAS ONLY ONE UNIVERSITY (COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY) THAT DID THE STUDY FOR THEM.IN OUR CASE.WE HAVE !3UNIVERSITIES DOING THE STUDY.WITH THE CLIMATE WARMING,EMPHASIS IS NOW SHIFTING TO NUCLEAR,AND SOLAR… [Read Full Text]

Author: kessyjc
Fri Jul 11 05:27:47 2008

The basic difficulty of discussing anything about Nigeria here on the Web is the want of expertise on the part of those who contribute. Most views tend to be more emotively inclined. Would that there would be some honest to God scholarly discussions on issues that affect our country-- with the facts presented--so that those who think they have something to say would know the very reasons behind arguments that are being made and judge arguments on their values and merits--based on known or projected facts. As it is, having any sensible discussion on these pages is like trying… [Read Full Text]



Sign up for FREE daily 'top headlines' by email »


SELECT
SELECT

Most Active Stories: Nigeria

Ask Obama a Question