Dumisani Muleya
24 July 2008
Johannesburg — ZIMBABWE's main political parties - which begin power-sharing talks in Pretoria today - are expected to reach a final settlement promptly as they have already agreed on a wide range of issues on the agenda.
This explains the short and seemingly unrealistic two-week deadline they gave themselves after their leaders signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) in Harare on Monday which set the parameters for substantive negotiations.
People familiar with the talks say the biggest outstanding issue and sticking point is the type and structure of a new government.
The MOU signed by Zanu (PF) and the two factions of the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) commits them to put an end to "polarisation, divisions, conflict and intolerance" and says they are "determined to build a society free of violence, fear, intimidation, hate, patronage, corruption and (one) founded on justice, fairness, openness, transparency, dignity and equality".
The agenda for the next two weeks includes talks on the objectives and priorities of a new government; a new constitution; restoration of economic stability and growth; sanctions; and the land question.
Sources close to the talks said most of the issues on the agenda - including a new constitution - had already been agreed to.
A quick deal is expected because the final agreement would be based on a document approved, but not signed, by the parties in January.
Zanu (PF) and the MDC, which had negotiated as one party, had reached an agreement in January after eight months of talks, but failed to sign it due to clashes over the date of elections and the mechanics of implementing the agreement.
Sources from both sides said the parties were likely to base their talks on the January deal and then focus on the key items on the current agenda: the framework for a new government, implementation mechanisms and global political agreement.
"Almost all the issues which will be discussed in the next two weeks in Pretoria starting were on last year's agenda for talks. The negotiators took that agenda and the January agreement and formulated the MOU and the new agenda," a source said.
" They are agreed on most of the issues, except mainly the framework for a new government. The deal is basically done, but what remains are a few issues of detail, implementation and logistics."
President Robert Mugabe yesterday held a Zanu (PF) politburo meeting to discuss the talks and prospects of a government of national unity with the MDC. He has not appointed a new cabinet or sworn in a new parliament because of the talks. The combined opposition has a majority of seats in parliament after elections in March and Mugabe won a runoff presidential election as sole candidate in June.
Insiders said the politburo meeting was to prepare Mugabe's party for a new dispensation which might be resisted by his divided and faction-ridden organisation. Previous agreements with the MDC were rejected by Zanu (PF) hardliners.
It is understood Mugabe would prefer to remain as executive president, while MDC leader Morgan Tsvangirai becomes prime minister. However, Tsvangirai has said that he would want to be prime minister with Mugabe as nonexecutive president.
Sources said President Thabo Mbeki wants a settlement to the impasse by next month when he takes over as Southern African Development Community (SADC) chairman. Mbeki was appointed mediator by the SADC last year. Mbeki has reportedly lobbied China to block United Nations sanctions on Harare, while leaning on Mugabe to accept a deal.
Kenyan Prime Minister Raila Odinga - understood to be close to Tsvangirai - said in London yesterday after meeting British Prime Minister Gordon Brown that Mugabe might need a "peaceful, decent exit" to resolve the country's political crisis. Odinga - who heads a Kenyan unity government - said Mugabe could remain during a transitional arrangement.
Read comments. Write your own.
Copyright © 2008 Business Day. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com). To contact the copyright holder directly for corrections — or for permission to republish or make other authorized use of this material, click here.
AllAfrica aggregates and indexes content from over 125 African news organizations, plus more than 200 other sources, who are responsible for their own reporting and views. Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica.
Yaaah Baasi! All good ideas come from your small RACIST, meddling and non-kaffir brains. Yes baasi! there should NEVER peace in Great Zimbabwe unless approved by your non-afrikan, patronising brains which believe that David Livingstone discovered the Motsi wa Tunya on the Zambezi river. OOooh BAASI chabwino baasi!!!!
Geez Aka, the guys praising black africans for taking a stand against leaders who beat, maim and torture there own people to keep power. And you call him a racist? Not sure what logic you are keeping there my friend. I think you need to change your mindset that all white people are the enemy of africa. Some of us want to help.
Yaa BAASI! As l said in one of my posts that honestly some of my best friends are white. l love white people, especially those who do not impose themselves on Africa ... the missionary type, like your good self. The type that NEVER allow an African decide things for himself and wallow in his mess and allow him to figure out how to get out of his African mess. Can you tell me why the white NGO flood any space of the earth that is run by Africans ..eg.. Haiti, Zimbabwe etc??? No NGOs were a force in apartheid… [Read Full Text]
Aka,
A couple of points.
You say you dont like "The type that NEVER allow an African decide things for himself" Surely by this you must mean Mugabe for failing to deliver a free and fair election and thus allow the people of Zimbabwe to be heard? As for NGO's flood places run by africans, as these are the places that need help. They dont flood australia or new zealand or europe because people there can feed themselves. Africas as a result of droughts and bad governance and wars cannot. Just ask yourself the number of mulnourished people in Africa… [Read Full Text]
Yaaah Baasi! All good ideas come from your small RACIST, meddling and non-kaffir brains. Yes baasi! there should NEVER peace in Great Zimbabwe unless approved by your non-afrikan, patronising brains which believe that David Livingstone discovered the Motsi wa Tunya on the Zambezi river. OOooh BAASI chabwino baasi!!!!
Oh! What a human tragedy should people go along your much devalued opinion?
By making such statements you are giving Mugabe a renewed hope to cling to power illegitimately. At least you should show respect to those valiant freedom fighters who gave their life for you to be able to continue to survive. At the same time should you not pin down Mugabe for his ferocious attacks against innocent citizens, you may count yourself as a potential target unless you cowardly sing his praise even when you witness the killing, maiming and raping of your wife, daughter or sister!!
Peace… [Read Full Text]
Are you blind or something? how many people did Odinga kill in Kenya? His hands are filthy and dripping with innocent blood and you support him.Hippocrites....
See all comments (17).
I listened to the Kenyan PM yesterday on the CNN. I bet his interview was censored within Zimbabwe!
He is a politician of a new generation who has dumped the much decried AU policy until recently of non-interference in other countries so-called internal affairs. Leaders like him and those of Liberia, Zambia, Senegal and the ANC President currently form a core of African leaders who will assist African citizens get rid of maverick bloodstained dictators like Mugabe. They are igniting hope that genuine freedom in Africa will not a vain word.
A decent way out to the hero turned bloodstained… [Read Full Text]