25 July 2008
editorial
Many people were taken by surprise by the news that Zimbabwe President Robert Mugabe, and opposition Movement for Democratic Change's Morgan Tsvangirai, had agreed to meet after years of open animosity between the two.
The pace picked up this week when it was announced that the two signed a deal which committed both sides to creating "a genuine, viable, permanent and sustainable solution".
While one should not negate the positive side to two sworn enemies agreeing to reconcile, particularly if one takes into account the high cost to that African country of one man's intransigence and long-time refusal to even acknowledge the opposition MDC, the world should nevertheless not be lulled into complacently thinking that change there is a fait accompli because the two men have shaken hands.
Amnesty International this week issued a statement in which they emphasised that the climate of fear inside Zimbabwe persists despite the 'deal' between the two political foes; and also went on to appeal that violent acts should not be pardoned simply because the two sides were now engaged in talks.
As the power-sharing talks between the two were scheduled to start yesterday, Amnesty emphasised that "There can be no lasting political solution to the crisis in Zimbabwe without addressing past human rights violations.
While human rights violations must end immediately, investigations must be carried out and alleged perpetrators brought to justice."
It added - and this has been corroborated by a variety of other reports - that it continued to receive reports of ongoing political violence and harassment, particularly in rural areas.
Even since the signing of Monday's 'memorandum of understanding' by the ruling party and opposition, victims of political violence have had to seek medical treatment for injuries sustained in attacks.
Amnesty listed specific incidents that had taken place in the course of this week.
The international human rights watchdog added "The attacks that have killed as many as 150, injured thousands and displaced tens of thousands over the last several months - and which continue to take place - must not be swept under the carpet in the interest of finding a short-term political solution," said Amnesty International.
"This would store up problems for further down the road."
While attempts are being made by all Zimbabwean political parties - and the Southern African Development Community, African Union and United Nations - to address the political and economic crisis, Amnesty International said that important questions of justice and impunity were not explicitly tackled in the 'memorandum of understanding' signed on Monday.
"Any future deal between the parties should not include amnesties, pardons or any other measures that would prevent the emergence of the truth, a final judicial determination of guilt or non-guilt, and full reparations to victims and their families."
In signing the memorandum, the ruling party and opposition committed themselves to condemning the promotion and use of violence and to taking all measures necessary to ensure that the structures and institutions it controls are not engaged in acts of violence.
We share the concerns of Amnesty that in spite of the latest political developments, Zimbabwe is still blanketed in a climate of fear.
Until and unless the agreement reached between the two parties deals with issues of human rights, including the protection of freedom of expression, as well as freedom of association and assembly as is provided for under section 20 and 21 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe, we will be sceptical that the outcome of the new power-share deal is likely to improve basic living conditions of the majority of the people of that country.
It may be an 'important step' in the eyes of some to resolving the stand-off which plunged the country into a political crisis, but at the end of the day, it must mean more than that in practical terms for the people of Zimbabwe to believe that a change for the better is in the offing.
Read comments. Write your own.
Copyright © 2008 The Namibian. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com). To contact the copyright holder directly for corrections — or for permission to republish or make other authorized use of this material, click here.
AllAfrica aggregates and indexes content from over 125 African news organizations, plus more than 200 other sources, who are responsible for their own reporting and views. Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica.
couldn't agree more with you mate.
Your position must be hailed as being a fresh look over the shoulder at what ugly things are taking place in the neighbouring country at the instigation of maverick bloodstained Mugabe.
Namibia has started taking bold positions lately against violence in Zimbabwe. That's encouraging, coming from a country that, like Zimbabwe, had to fight a liberation war to gain independance. Namibia has also gone through a smooth transfer of power.
Maverick Mugabe, as much a hero at the beginning, made a U-turn. He refused to hand over power to a younger generation. Instead, with the active collusion of his cronies,… [Read Full Text]
Please let us begin to be realistic about the situation in Zimbabwe. First of all, after all the dust has settled, agreements signed, hand shaking is over, there will be little or no change in Zimbabwe. Past history of Mugabe and company has shown that whatever the situation Mugabe will implement or not implement change depending on how that change affects his position. ZANU-PF will continue to be the political power in the country. MDC cannot even begin to compete with ZANU-PF in any arena. The power behind the throne, JOC, CIO, police, whatever, will… [Read Full Text]
I think that future corruption in the politics of Zimbabwe can be prevented by creating a term limit similar to that which we have in the United States. It seems that the roots of Mr. Mugabe grew to deeply into the government resulting in mass corruption.