Siseko Njobeni
19 September 2008
Johannesburg — ON A typical hot summer's day in Bothaville two years ago, a group of journalists, along with dignitaries such as Free State Premier Beatrice Marshoff and businessman Valli Moosa, witnessed the unveiling of an ambitious R7bn maize-to-fuel project.
The construction of the first of eight ethanol plants in SA's major maize-producing areas of Free State, Mpumalanga and North West, was the news commercial farmers needed at one of their most trying times.
A free fall in the maize price left farmers with bulging stocks. Any money making initiative to reduce the stocks was welcome.
"The bio-ethanol industry is the Free State's largest single economic development since ( the 1950s ) inception of the gold mining industry ," Johann Hoffman, of maize-to-fuel company Ethanol Africa, said in 2006 .
Hammered by erratic maize prices, biofuel production was a ray of hope for many farmers ready to throw in the towel and leave the agricultural sector.
Little wonder the commer-cial farming community showed boundless enthusiasm. But their high hopes crashed before their eyes, because the government had other ideas.
Concerned about food security, the government has excluded maize as a possible feedstock, at least in the initial stages of developing the biofuels industry.
Carbon credits group Sterling Waterford and Ethanol, the 50/50 partners in the project, did not hesitate to share their detailed plans for the project.
There seemed to be no turning back. The Bothaville plant was supposed to have been completed and in full production by the middle of last year.
But the backers of maize-to-fuel plants have seen their beautiful dream turn into a horrifying nightmare, in a short time.
The global maize price increase and shortage of food in Mexico due to biofuels investments, influenced the state's cautious stance in not including maize at the project outset .
"It is envisaged that bio- ethanol production from maize will be considered only once certainty on the ability of the underutilised land to produce has been ascertained and the necessary measures are in place to guard against extreme food inflation," the strategy says.
The decision took the Southern African Biofuels Association (Saba) by surprise, says its president, Andrew Makenete.
"Maize was supposed to be the foundation of a South African biofuels project."
Gregor Paterso n-Jones, CEO of Sterling Waterford Securities, a subsidiary of Sterling Waterford, said , "As for development of ethanol plants, we have adopted a wait and see attitude. All plans have been put on hold."
Cape Town-based Sterling Waterford owns 50% of maize-to-ethanol company Ethanol Africa. Ecofield, a company representing a group of South African commercial farmers, owns the other 50% of Ethanol Africa.
The Accelerated and Shared Growth Initiative of SA (Asgi-SA), identifies biofuels as one of three strategic sectors requiring government support.
The state's decision effectively curtailed the grand plans. In its biofuels industrial strategy, the minerals and energy department said biofuels plant investment could be a catalyst for transforming rural econo-mies and contribute to Asgi-SA.
Given the economy's energy shortfall, biofuels deserve a place in the sun. Saba has assessed biofuels' potential to contribute 10% of SA's diesel by 2010.
Be the first to Write a Comment!
Copyright © 2008 Business Day. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com). To contact the copyright holder directly for corrections — or for permission to republish or make other authorized use of this material, click here.
AllAfrica aggregates and indexes content from over 125 African news organizations, plus more than 200 other sources, who are responsible for their own reporting and views. Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica.
