The Nation (Nairobi)

Kenya: Who Really Owns These Tanks?

Dominic Wabala

1 October 2008


Nairobi — Doubts grew on Wednesday over official claims that the battle tanks hijacked by Somali pirates belonged to Kenya.

The authenticity of shipping documents presented by the Government to prove Kenya's ownership was called into question -- and investigations showed the cargo might in fact have been destined for South Sudan, as the US Navy has claimed all along.

Impeccable sources in Kenya's military confided that the tanks and other arms -- including anti-aircraft guns and rocket propelled grenades -- were going to Mombasa only to be off-loaded and sent on to Juba, the South Sudan capital.

The seizure of the equipment, the source said, had put the Kenya Government in an awkward position because it was seen to be in breach of a UN embargo on sale of arms to Sudan.

Government spokesman Alfred Mutua declined to comment further when contacted on Wednesday, except to state: "There is nothing new, and if anything we will post it on our website."

He added that he had not been given the latest information on the standoff between the pirates and the owners of the Ukrainian ship MV Faina, and refused to revisit the question of ownership of the 33 Russian-made T-72 tanks and other military hardware on board.

Dr Mutua, in an attempt to show the cargo belonged to Kenya, released on Monday evening photocopies of a bill of lading and a letter from the Ukrainian exporter about the seizure.

Efforts to establish the authenticity of the bill and the letter, allegedly received from Ukrainian state-owned arms dealer Ukrinmash appealing to the Kenyan government to "assume indispensable measures" to secure the hijacked ship and its cargo, were unsuccessful.

The only indication that the goods were Kenyan was a reference in the letter allegedly from a Ukrainian firm that quotes four invisible contracts dated between 2006 and 2008.

On the bill of lading, the consignee is indicated as Ministry of Defence and the owner as Waterlux AG. The Waterlux AG website shows that it is the owner of the vessel MV Faina, the hijacked ship.

The Nation sent questions to the Ukrinmash website address but none of them has been answered.

The questions included: "Are you in contact with the pirates?

"Are the pirates demanding ransom?

"Are you ready to pay?

"Which countries are helping you?

"Was the consignment destined for Kenya or Southern Sudan?"

It also emerged that Kenya might have been sucked into an arms stockpiling contest between the Sudanese government in Khartoum and the South Sudan administration based in Juba.

Air force

Sources in South Sudan told the Nation that Sudanese President Omar el-Bashir -- currently facing indictment for war crimes over the genocide in Darfur -- has been spending huge amounts of money modernising his army, especially the air force.

South Sudan had responded by acquiring a wide range of military hardware including the tanks seized last week, the sources said.

The stockpiling appears to be linked to next year's referendum, which will decide whether Sudan remains one unified state or splits into North and South.

In case of a split, the sharing of oil resources could trigger tension between the two new countries.

Investigations by the Nation found that despite repeated claims of ownership of the arms shipment by the Kenya Government, the Department of Defence was finding itself in an embarrassing position because their importing breaks most of its own procurement rules.

"Kenya's defence policy is non-aggression, not war... our policy is to buy from the West, and that has not changed," the source said.

The procurement rules, coupled with Kenya's stated foreign policy and a check with the Ukrainian exporter and shipper, plus sources within the military indicate that the tanks were in fact on their way to transit to South Sudan, in spite of official Kenyan denials.

When the pirates seized the ship last Thursday, Mr Andrew Mwangura of the East African Seafarers Association was quoted as saying that the cargo was destined for Southern Sudan and was the latest of three or four such shipments since last year.

The Nation established that the tanks started passing through Mombasa last year. On November 2, a train carrying 17 T-72 tanks derailed at Kokotoni about 30km from Mombasa, damaging five of them.

The accident, which happened shortly after 4am, prompted a military security operation at the scene.

The area was sealed off and army officers prevented the press from taking pictures. Then, on January 25, this year, 33 more tanks were ferried by train from the port during the height of the post-election violence.

As well as the Kenya Government, diplomats from Sudan and Ukraine dismissed reports that the arms were destined for Juba and insisted that they belonged to Kenya.

Senior military officials, who sought anonymity because they have been ordered not to speak about the issue, said the country's defence policy had not changed since Independence.

According to them, Kenya's armed forces have the primary role of defending territorial boundaries in line with the country's policy of non-aggression.

Although the DoD has been buying arms, the Government does not encourage neighbours to stockpile weapons at the level seen recently.

Insiders in the DoD indicated that all officers were from Friday ordered not to discuss or speculate on the ship's hijacking or its cargo.

According to the sources, Kenya has since Independence been acquiring its hardware from the West. Only recently did the Government turn to China to buy troop lorries, Y12 aircraft and guns.

Successive regimes have not warmed up to Russia in the past and anyone in government perceived to be friendly to the former Soviet bloc country is usually treated with suspicion

This was the case shortly after Independence when Jaramogi Oginga Odinga, who was then seen as left-leaning, was accused by politicians in the then Kanu government of President Kenyatta as having imported arms from Russia -- which later turned out to have been in transit to the Congo.

Import arms

"The Kenyatta Government did not entertain any suggestions to import arms from Russia while the Moi regime rejected offers by China to train military officers," the source said.

The source said it would require a drastic change of government policy to change military hardware given that even the personnel must be trained before the equipment was acquired.

And the people in President Kibaki's Government do not show any signs of turning to Russian hardware.

The DoD has an elaborate procedure for procuring arms and equipment.

Unlike in the past when DoD has procured military hardware, this time round, the Nation investigations found no information showing that a technical team or other military personnel from the department travelled to Ukraine to evaluate the T-72 tanks or for training.

Read comments. Write your own.

Copyright © 2008 The Nation. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com). To contact the copyright holder directly for corrections — or for permission to republish or make other authorized use of this material, click here.

AllAfrica aggregates and indexes content from over 125 African news organizations, plus more than 200 other sources, who are responsible for their own reporting and views. Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica.

Author: wariogebhre
Thu Oct 2 22:00:38 2008

here lies a man who always preferd himself to others, always supported the underhand deals, backstabbing and betrayal, here lies a man whose ambition knew no bounds, not even truth and decency could limit his ambition, here lies a man who feasted while his countrymen starved, here lies a man who left a fat secret bank account in a foreign country to benefit the stranger with what he stole from his own countrymen, here lies a man who never wanted to see another advance, here lies a man who was kristian at daytime but was a darling of the… [Read Full Text]

Author: matigari
Fri Oct 17 06:24:06 2008

This is not the first time that Kenya has used her end-user certificate to benefit other war-torn nations. In the eighties, Kenya did it during the Iran-Iraq war. A senior civil servant, later to become a cabinet minister for both Moi and Kibaki administration, was the key beneficiary. That man is now prided as one of the richest men in the country!

Author: wariogebhre
Thu Oct 2 22:00:43 2008

here lies a man who always preferd himself to others, always supported the underhand deals, backstabbing and betrayal, here lies a man whose ambition knew no bounds, not even truth and decency could limit his ambition, here lies a man who feasted while his countrymen starved, here lies a man who left a fat secret bank account in a foreign country to benefit the stranger with what he stole from his own countrymen, here lies a man who never wanted to see another advance, here lies a man who was kristian at daytime but was a darling of the… [Read Full Text]

Author: Icho!
Fri Oct 3 08:04:28 2008

Thank you Mr Odinga for what your govt is doing ie not honouring UN embargos. I thought its you who loud mouthed on Zimbabwe destined weapons from China, what do you say now that the ball is in your court, weapons (heavy artillery for that matter)destined for South Sudan where there is war raging on. Was there any war in Zimbabwe when you spate your rubbish on Zimbabwe Defence Forces and was Zim breaking any UN arms embargo? Is that your so called democracy at play? They say LOOK before you LEAP and are you Mr Odinga doing that? I… [Read Full Text]

Author: putdown08
Mon Oct 6 14:27:19 2008

The kenya press is rotten but it is in kenya's interest for southern sudan to be stable and be able to diffend itself from any aggresion. Thats way we can do business with them. Whether they have weapons or not it is our duty to help them aquire them. we have hosted them for decades and it is time to make them stand on their own.

Author: putdown08
Wed Oct 8 14:55:27 2008

By the way for your information Southern sudan is Kenya B Somalia Is Kenya C. So the quesition of who owns the tanks does not arrive. Even Ethiopia lies somewhere in between. Ugandans are our cousins.

Author: irasmus
Mon Oct 13 17:45:32 2008

What stupidity. Does anyone who reads these article possess either intelligence or education or knowledge of the world? True the west has ignored Africa other than protecting its own interest. That must stop. We need to protect all opressed? Just because they cannot make it to our shores does not mean they do not deserve to be free. Stop piracy. We should do as the mullahs did. They steal ships. We steal their life. The world needs to unite to follow this doctrine in these dire times. We cannot even deliver humanitarian aid because we allow these terrorists to live… [Read Full Text]

Author: euroatlantica
Mon Feb 23 20:13:12 2009

The Kenyan military is not ordered the Ukrainian arms The government and the armed forces of Kenya suddenly made resonant statement, reported the Euro-Atlantic cooperation, that the military cargo seized by pirates «Faina» is not intended for their country. The U.S. has already demanded a formal explanation of Kiev, in whose hands really should have hit the Ukrainian weapons. Why Kenyan leadership has otkrestilos of our tanks, was whether the seizure «Faina» accident and that will tell about this «Ukrspetsexport»? Rumors that the Ukrainian side to a dry cargo ship «Faina» in… [Read Full Text]

See all comments (10).



Sign up for FREE daily 'top headlines' by email »


SELECT
SELECT
Ask President Obama a Question