Kevin J Kelley
2 November 2008
The US should help initiate multilateral military action against rebels in the Democratic Republic of Congo if a UN force fails to stabilise areas now rocked by turmoil, an influential US-based think tank said last week.
Such an intervention would be justified under the UN's doctrine of "responsibility to protect," argued a report by the Council on Foreign Relations.
According to this standard, outside nations have a responsibility to save the lives of imperilled civilians should a turbulent country's government prove unable to do so.
In those circumstances, Washington must take the lead at the UN in organising "more aggressive action" in eastern Congo, says the report.
It also calls for the US to "at least provide logistical and intelligence support" to such a military undertaking.
Jendayi Frazer, the State Department's top Africa official, hinted at the possibility of a tougher US stance when she spoke to reporters last week in Nairobi.
Referring to the rebel fighters, Ms Frazer warned, "They will be held accountable for actions taking place" in eastern Congo.
The Council on Foreign Relations cites a UN-approved, European-led intervention in Congo's Ituri region four years ago, along with the British intervention in Sierra Leone in 2000, as precedents for such a move.
The envisioned UN-backed and US-supported force should seek to "neutralise the abilities of various armed groups to control large areas and terrorise hundreds of thousands of Congolese," the report adds.
Washington must act on the fact that "important US strategic interests are at stake" in Congo, the council says.
In addition to playing a potentially decisive role in ensuring stability in Central Africa, Congo "is endowed with vast lodes of important minerals," the report notes. "Large-scale international investors are re-investing in the Congo, including US-based Freeport McMoRan Copper and Gold, Inc, one of the largest copper and gold mining companies in the world."
Prior to organising a new intervention force, the US should seek to bolster the existing UN peacekeeping force in the Congo known as Monuc, says the report.
"The most important [short-term] action the United States can take is to use its full diplomatic power at the UN Security Council to ensure that Monuc has the necessary personnel and mandate to fulfil its central role," says the report written by Anthony Gambino, a former Congo mission chief for the US Agency for International Development.
With 17,000 troops deployed in eastern Congo, Monuc ranks as the largest UN peacekeeping force in the world. But its size and capabilities are being proved inadequate as rebel forces close in on Goma, the region's biggest city.
At present, however, the US appears unwilling to support an expansion of Monuc, the report observes. In fact, it says, there are "regular rumblings, particularly within the US executive branch and Congress, that Monuc, because of its cost and the Bush administration's focus in Africa on ensuring funding for peacekeeping in Sudan, should move rapidly toward closure."
In addition, a US law enacted two years ago threatens withdrawal of American assistance to Congo should the country's government fail to make progress toward a lengthy set of goals, such as respect for human rights.
Withdrawal of US assistance "would ultimately damage the United States' significant interests in the DRC, including regional stability, natural resources and humanitarian concerns," the report warns.
Washington has provided more than $2 billion during the past 10 years to assist the Congo government and to help sustain Monuc's operations.
Current US annual funding amounts to about $125 million in bilateral aid and $300 million in contributions to the Monuc mission.
Read comments. Write your own.
Copyright © 2008 The East African. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com). To contact the copyright holder directly for corrections — or for permission to republish or make other authorized use of this material, click here.
AllAfrica aggregates and indexes content from over 125 African news organizations, plus more than 200 other sources, who are responsible for their own reporting and views. Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica.
The UN, The US, the EU and AU, mast focus on resolving the root of all problems and ensure freedom and security of all rwandophone in the region in particular that of Batutsi as they the most hunted and killed by Kabila's governement and his allies. No army will defeat CNDP unless this issues are properly addressed.
This guy claude_rutsinzi thinks that these Batutsi are so almighty and he seems to believe that they are more important than many other tribes that are currently suffering in the DRC.
claude_rutsinzi you can believe in guns and you guys have proven that you like blood. You know what? He who kills with sword shall die by it. SOONER or LATER, you will be in trouble but at least you have Rwanda to run into.
The US is part of what is going on down in DRC otherwise they would have been the first to urge for a concrete military line of action against the Nkunda led rebellion that has let the civilians in dire situation. Infact you should know that the governments of Uganda and Rwanda are US puppets that are being used to destabilize eastern Congo so that they plunder the resources the DRC has in abundance. Recall a BBC report about the plunder of minerals by UN peace keepers that the UN investigated and found out that it was being done by… [Read Full Text]
Is it correct that Mugga's sent some of his boys over to Kabila's place to practice up on a little lootin' shootin',and rootin'????
The U.S have been aware of the situation in the Congop for many years. The Clinton administration was a staunch ally of Rwanda and it did ignore what was going on in the Congo in order to show empathy for the Rwanda's genocide. It is hard to see how the Americans can fight the rebels to whom they give logistical and intelligence support through Rwanda and Uganda. An EU force can make a huge difference on the ground.