11 November 2008
editorial
Lagos — The Democratic Republic of Congo is a sorry sight at the moment. A country whose chequered history is replete with rebellion, civil conflicts, rapacious exploitation of its abundant natural resources, gross human suffering and wholesale deaths now hosts, yet again, sordid experiences. Only concerted efforts by the international community can halt the deadly slide by a country that has clearly lost the ability to save itself.
The unfolding tragedy is sad, both in its origin and prosecution. Government forces are up against the National Congress for the Defence of the People (CNDP), a rebel group led by General Laurent Nkunda, over differences that are partly traceable to the unprecedented Rwandan genocide of 1994. The rebels, backed by the government of President Paul Kagame of Rwanda, have sought to control the eastern part of Congo. Kiwanja and the areas surrounding the North Kivu Provincial Capital of Goma now bear the morbid footsteps of the rampaging CNDP soldiers. The ceasefire that was declared by Nkunda last week only proved to be a ploy for reinforcement as his men have - against war conventions -turned on the civilian population in the affected areas, killing, looting and raping - the same crimes they accused Congolese soldiers of committing which had partly triggered off the war. Now, the fate of the several hundreds of thousands of displaced persons and the others in the region hangs in the balance.
That should not be allowed to remain so for long as the consequences would be too grave and constitute yet another scar on the conscience of the world. The events that led to the massacre 14 years ago are too fresh in the minds of the civilised world. The Security Council and the African Union have key roles to play in this regard. They should compel Kagame and President Joseph Kabila of the DRC to honour the spirit of the November 2007 Nairobi Accord which both of them had assented to. That pact derived its strength from Congo's pledge to disarm the Hutu militias within its territory who have remained a threat to the Kagame government. Rwanda's Tutsi - dominated regime had also agreed to fortify its borders to deny Nkunda's mostly Tutsi fighters access to assistance. Any step towards resolving the crisis that omits this basic strategy will hardly succeed as the predicament of the Congo-Rwanda axis is largely ethnic.
But that approach is not exhaustive, as economic considerations have fed the predatory instincts of Congo's leaders and other interests for too long. At a point, one of its former presidents, Mobutu Sese Seko, was richer than his own country through a deliberate process of mineral exploitation. Nkunda and his gang are in fact apprehensive of the present president's perceived design to corruptly enrich himself that way. Those fears should be adequately addressed as world and African leaders attempt to find a lasting solution to the perennial problems of that nation. The penury that the bulk of the 60 million Congolese dwell in despite their country's generous endowment, therefore, makes the issue of wealth distribution inevitable. For a resource rich country like Congo, the level of poverty portrayed in the footage of people fleeing Goma is unacceptable.
The arbiters should boldly put it on the table this time if a more permanent remedy is to be found. The Congolese should also come to terms with the desirability of restructuring the geo-political profile of their vast country. That would make for better accessibility, supervision and good governance. Too much power is concentrated at the centre, which has proven too weak to control the nation. Whatever would be mutually agreeable to the parties should be tried and then thoroughly monitored by the UN and AU.
On a final note, the world community must rise up before it becomes too late. Since the 17,000-strong UN peacekeeping force - its largest mission anywhere - has so far failed to contain the self-inflicted calamities that periodically engulf Congo, it simply means that much more should be done, and urgently too, especially by wealthier, stronger nations.
The world must not be taken through the painful process of negligence, aloofness, reluctance and then the mass slaughter of innocent people over again.
Read comments. Write your own.
Copyright © 2008 This Day. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com). To contact the copyright holder directly for corrections — or for permission to republish or make other authorized use of this material, click here.
AllAfrica aggregates and indexes content from over 125 African news organizations, plus more than 200 other sources, who are responsible for their own reporting and views. Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica.
Lumumba, one of the mendacious 'fathers' of African 'independence.' And a communist, to boot. There will be time to deconstruct Lumumba, Nkeumah, and others in the same pit of political rascals.
Rhetorically, the commonplace of "foundation" is the mother of slippery slopes, and thematically here, I deploy the same: the METAFOUNDATION of what you choose to call the "foundation" of the "Congo" troubles.
THE HORROR OF THE BELGIANS.
Kindest Felicitations.
Lumumba has never been a communist despite the american and western accusations to justify his murder.His main crime was that he was a nationalist who wanted a strong Congo nation. This is,in part, still the motivation behind the multiple invasions of Congo by the forces of evil. Now with capitalism showing its limits in the recent collapse of world finance, questions arise if this is the way to go.
"Fathers of the world".Why is it that before Western Europe and the U.S. came into our Houses we did'nt have mass killing and fighting 24/7 between the peoples?Think ?Think? But,after they colonize us, beat us up for centuries,and left with any and everything they wanted,why would we want a partner like that I'll never know.We're unsound.Why?Why? why? ,would we accept Sanctions of any kind from anyone.God gave us our land ,our country.Peace and love.Oweij Liebo U.S.A.
I think, now that we understand this Africa needs to stand together especially in a situation suc as this.
This is an opportunity for Africa to make amend. This war has to be stopped. Those rebels need to be kicked out and Congo badly need assistance from other african countries right now.
Mobutu left no army. Congo is now starting EVERYTHING afresh. It is unfair to be attacking them this way. I really hope that countries such as Angola, Nigeria, South Africa would opt for common sense and send troops in the Congo. Forget about the UN force. They are never in Congo to help congolese. Did you know that Congo was the first African country to receive a visit by a UN secretary? He actually died there in a crash.
The difference between this conflict and other conflicts in Africa is that this particular (current) one has no real conflict about it.
Lumumba was a "nationalist"? Gimme a break: What "nation" did he re-represent? He is as much a 'nationalist' as the confused Malcolm X, or do you differ?
Assume that he was not a Commie. That takes you nowhere, for Communism or Socialism or its epigoni in Africa, such as Nyrere's bunkum doctrine is theoretical gibberish and practical poison.
I am not clear about your allusion to the current problems of "capitalism." Whose capitalism? Remember, there are different models or mappings of "capitatlism."
I hope you don't construe the casino in New York City as "capitalism": the casino caused the "housing meltdown" in Main Street America.
To borrow a well-known trope, capitalism has been hijacked by the degenerate gamblers in New York. It is time, perhaps, to 747 Gamblers Anonymous to the rescue.
To return to the problematic of Lumumba, I say: mendacious father of 'independence' from a despotic Belgian life world.
Cheers.
Guess who laid the foundation for Congo's 45-year old civil war? Western Europe and the US when they poisoned the popularly elected Lumumba in favor of the Western world's preferred stooge - Mobutu. How quickly we forget that once you put a yoke (as they always do to their slaves) on a poor and innocent country like that, you condemn them to perpetual conflict to which the instigators will pretend as if they are sending peacekeepers to separate the warring factions by engaging a tiny country like Rwanda to continue to wag the big and mighty dog known as Congo. The same game they are currently attempting between Nigeria and Ghana. Our public needs to understand global real-politik of divide and conquer b4 we start to criticize Mugabe regarding his commitment to wrest control of his people's land from the minority group of westerners that control more than 80% of that country's arable land.