6 January 2009
editorial
Lagos — IN other climes, what Mr. John Agyekum Kufour did by leaving power after eight years would mean nothing. In Africa where leaders are in a race to overstay their welcome, Kufour has created distinctness - even hope.
Elections in Ghana passed with minimal rancour, unlike the riots that trail them all over Africa. Kufour's party just failed to make the 50 per cent plus one vote required to win the presidency when its candidate gained only 49.13 per cent of the votes cast on December 7.
It would have been easy to make up the numbers but neither Kufour, nor his party did that. The run-off still finally failed to produce an immediate winner though Professor John Atta-Mills of the opposition National Democratic Congress was leading, albeit marginally.
Ghana's democracy has passed four consecutive multi-party elections since 1992, a record for any African country. Remarkably, after eight years of Jerry Rawlings, his party lost power to Kufour's, again through a run-off. Kufour lost one of the elections to Rawlings.
Born on December 8, 1938 in Kumasi, Ghana, Kufour studied at Prempeh College where he passed at the top of his class. He enrolled at Lincoln Inn, London, and was called to the Bar in 1961 at 22. He then entered Oxford University where he passed his BA Honours degree in 1964 in Economics, Philosophy and Politics. The University, in accordance with Oxford traditions, conferred him with the Master's degree.
Kufour has been in politics since 1967, as Town Clerk (City Manager) of Kumasi, the second largest city in Ghana. He was a member of the 1968-69 and the 1979 Constituent Assemblies that drafted the constitutions of the second and third republics. He was twice elected a Member of Parliament, during the second and third republics. He was a Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, Spokesman on Foreign Affairs and Deputy Opposition Leader of the Popular Front Party Parliamentary Group during the third republic.
Kufour was appointed the Secretary for Local Government in the 1982 national government. He, however, resigned within seven months when he said the PNDC government was not the national government it promised.
Kufour came to the Presidency with unmatched credentials. His popularity was never in doubt. He won international acclaim for Ghana for his management of its politics and economy.
Why did Kufour not lean on his party's majority in parliament to extend his stay in power? Ghana has just struck oil, new wealth was on the way, the newly commissioned presidential palace was attractive, the global applauses he garnered could also have tempted him. He refused to succumb to them.
Kufour was in a class among African leaders. His sacrifices in sticking to the Constitution of Ghana - not amending it for his own interests - set him apart.
Ghanaians should be proud of the example they have set for other African countries, in addition to the independence of the electoral commission.
The transition in Ghana is a challenge to the continent, just like Kufour's exemplary leadership.
Read comments. Write your own.
Copyright © 2009 Vanguard. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com). To contact the copyright holder directly for corrections — or for permission to republish or make other authorized use of this material, click here.
AllAfrica aggregates and indexes content from over 125 African news organizations, plus more than 200 other sources, who are responsible for their own reporting and views. Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica.
Isn't it condescending to Mr. Kufour to assume that the only motivation for him to do what is right for his people is because of monetary reward. Whatever happens to just do it simply because it is the right thing to do. All this whiteman idea that is been forced down the throats of unsuspecting Africans, after all they did to overthrow a democratically elected Lumumba in favor of their favorite Mobutu, thereby condemning a young DRC into a failed state b4 it reaches puberty. What about their current vociferous attempt to punish the people of Zimbabwe for not overthrowing another popularly elected Mr. Mugabe because the Brits hates what he stands for - fighting to recover his people's land from the usurpers. How can we trust their motive anywhere else in Africa?
I think we are now seeing the fruit of the Mo Ibrahim prize (see http://www.moibrahimfoundation.org/the-prize.asp ).
By making it more attractive for African heads of state to leave office with good track records (the prize is larger than the Nobel), Mr Ibrahim has somewhat levelled the playing field, given that heas of state from other parts of the world can earn millions as after-dinner speakers, through memoirs, and suchlike.
We can look forward not only to more graceful departures in future, but also better conduct while in office. Alas the uhuru dinosaurs' track records disqualify them so they will dig in their heels to the bitter end.