David Cronin
8 January 2009
Brussels — Extreme poverty will continue to blight sub-Saharan Africa for another 200 years unless action to overcome it is intensified, a new report has suggested.
Social Watch, a network of campaigning groups, has devised a measure known as the "basic capabilities index" to assess the level of hardship throughout the world.
Its latest report finds that 80 countries -- home to half the world's population -- fare badly when three criteria are examined: the number of children who die before their fifth birthday, the proportion of children who complete primary education, and the proportion of births that are attended by trained midwives or other medical professionals.
Only 16 of these countries have registered considerable improvement since 2000. Although the countries making progress include India, home to 1.6 billion, regression has been recorded in others with a combined population of 150 million. The latter category includes Chad, Niger, Malawi, Benin and Yemen, while Bangladesh, Uganda, Nigeria, Madagascar and Ghana have been listed as stagnant.
While much of sub-Saharan Africa has recorded strong economic growth in recent years, this has not translated into a major drop in poverty levels. As things stand, the basic needs of millions of Africans will not be met until the 23rd century, with many governments struggling to fulfil pledges they have made. Zambia, for example, has undertaken to provide free basic health care for all citizens, yet continues to have one of the lowest rates of life expectancy on the planet.
Roberto Bissio, coordinator of Social Watch, predicted that the crisis which gripped international capitalism during 2008 will complicate matters further. "Poor countries are very likely going to suffer quite heavily from a crisis which they did not at all create," he said, indicating that crucial sources of money such as remittances from migrants overseas will probably decline.
Bissio argued that one of the most appropriate responses of governments would be to develop a more coherent response to the fulfilment of human rights, particularly those with an economic and social dimension.
Over the past twenty years, he said, international bodies have been eager to promote the 'rights' of corporations to establish themselves anywhere in the world, forbidding poor countries to "impose on them conditions that contribute to the development of host countries."
Lax investment rules have often meant that major companies pay little tax to the authorities in countries where they operate.
According to the World Bank up to 800 billion dollars in untaxed capital leaves poor countries or economies in transition each year. This dwarfs the 100 billion dollars that such countries receive in annual development aid.
The Tax Justice Network has argued that an international system for exchanging information on how much tax is paid by corporations should be established. The European Union already has such a scheme in place for its 27 member states, but with significant loopholes. Europeans wishing to hide money from the tax authorities can simply hide it in such havens as Singapore, for example.
Ana Gomes, a Portuguese Socialist member of the European Parliament, complained that Britain's centre-left government has been resisting efforts to crack down on tax havens in order to protect the City of London, the financial district of London. She argued that forthcoming discussions on reforming the world economy, such as meetings of the G20 group of the world's leading economies, must grapple with the surrounding problems.
"Tax havens are a source of inequality," she added. "There is no way that the rules (of international finance) are going to be rewritten in a sensible way if tax havens are not banished."
Reed Brody, a campaigner with Human Rights Watch, said it was "astounding" that 60 percent of the world's countries have made no progress in recent years in expanding female access to education. He called for increased investment in the realisation of basic entitlements as part of a "human rights stimulus package".
"When you free women from the discrimination and poor health that they face in their daily lives, you unleash the powers of half of humanity to contribute to economic growth," he said.
Simon Stocker from Eurostep, an alliance of anti-poverty groups, said that the EU's development aid activities pay greater heed to investment opportunities for western firms in poor countries than to health and education needs. Of 70 aid plans drawn up by EU officials for Africa, the Caribbean and the Pacific, health and education have been identified as priorities in less than 10 cases each.
"Partly because the European Union is itself built around an economically liberalised approach to development, this is automatically being exported (in its aid activities)," he said. "It looks more as if the European Union is promoting its own trade interests rather than the economic development of (aid recipient) countries themselves."
Read comments. Write your own.
Copyright © 2009 Inter Press Service. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com). To contact the copyright holder directly for corrections — or for permission to republish or make other authorized use of this material, click here.
AllAfrica aggregates and indexes content from over 125 African news organizations, plus more than 200 other sources, who are responsible for their own reporting and views. Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica.
Extreme poverty is always the expectable result of insufficient action. But not just any action is helpful. A business is not something to tax. Everything that business does with money employs someone, and performs a task in support of the economy. Each dollar taken out of a business's profits is a dollar not employing your neighbor, and a dollars worth of work that the people paid that company to do that is not being done. For the delusion that the people aren't paying these taxes, the people pay them repeatedly for years. Business regulation falls on the same backs, and so has the same opponents, but is a totally different problem. There are good and bad business regulations. There are only bad business taxes. A more aggressive approach to poverty in SubSaharan Africa would be the clearing of the aquatic weeds that choke your waterways. There is enough Typha Australis in Lake Chad to feed every African a daily loaf of bread, and what isn't fit for human consumption can be used as fuel. Right now, it is just dessicating your continent.
Im not sure I believe everything about this article because different sources always state different things,
money is a recent thingy. the west is in a poor state because they have killed so many of their babies. the most important thing is people they are the most valuable resource of any country on the planet. start putting care for people forward for youngest people and it will pay dividends in the future. youngest and smallest first and everyone else will benefit. This means good care for pregnant women through to birth and getting those youngest into school.
?
idk what method he went about finding his research but the money per capita in nigeria has doubled in 4 years from around 1200 to over 2000 according to the CIA factbook and grows at one of the fastest rates in the world.
What does it take to get an article of this site, it seems that everyones blog is good to go, what's the standard?