
Published by the government of Zimbabwe
Mabasa Sasa And Sydney Kawadza
9 January 2009
Harare — SADC has rejected MDC-T leader Mr Morgan Tsvangirai's request for a meeting to reopen debate on the allocation of ministries in Zimbabwe's inclusive Government.
Speaking to journalists in Harare yesterday, Sadc executive secretary Dr Tomaz Salamao said the bloc had no plans to convene such a meeting.
Earlier in the week, Sadc chair and South African President Cde Kgalema Motlanthe rejected Mr Tsvangirai's request for him to facilitate a "confidential meeting" with President Mugabe, telling him to instead immediately join the inclusive Government with Zanu-PF and MDC.
"The Sadc executive is the only office with a mandate to call a meeting of regional leaders in consultation with the chairman and the chairman of the Organ on Politics, Defence and Security (King Mswati III of Swaziland).
"I am currently consulting within the region and no letter has been written to convene such a meeting on Zimbabwe," Dr Salamao said.
Dr Salamao said while he had heard reports that the MDC-T leader was in Botswana, which hosts the Sadc headquarters, Mr Tsvangirai had never bothered to approach the offices with his grievances.
According to information at hand, on Tuesday President Motlanthe summoned Mr Tsvangirai to Tshwane where he told him he could not entertain his request as it would undermine the role of the facilitator, Cde Thabo Mbeki.
He also made it clear that MDC-T could not in one breath rubbish a binding resolution passed by a Sadc summit while at the same time asking the regional group to help him push Cde Mugabe out of power.
The rejection comes on the back of indications that the South African government recently told United States Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs Jendayi Frazer to respect the Sadc initiatives in Zimbabwe and stop treating the country as if "it is in America's backyard".
South African sources told The Herald that Frazer tried to "intimidate" them into forcing President Mugabe out of office and picking someone else to represent Zanu-PF in the inclusive Government because "Tsvangirai was too weak to handle" the Zimbabwean leader.
"President Motlanthe told Tsvangirai that there was no way he would facilitate a meeting on the issue of the inclusive Government while excluding (Prof Arthur) Mutambara and the facilitator.
"He pointed out that Tsvangirai had insulted Sadc leaders by rubbishing the resolution in Sandton on the structure of the inclusive Government and that it should be constituted immediately.
"As such, it was highly irregular to expect him to chair another meeting whose outcome Tsvangirai could just as easily insult. His final words to Tsvangirai were that he should return home, join the inclusive Government and seek to solve any other outstanding issues from inside for the sake of progress," a diplomatic source revealed.
President Motlanthe, the source said, indicated that it was "highly irregular" for him to be seen to be usurping the facilitator's role.
The South African leader's rejection of Mr Tsvangirai's request prompted the latter to convene a crisis meeting in South Africa to re-strategise in the face of regional resistance to their demands.
Observers yesterday questioned why Mr Tsvangirai was holding the meeting with his executive in South Africa rather than returning to Zimbabwe.
President Motlanthe's position, according to observers, leaves MDC-T with few options to pursue their agenda of using Sadc to push President Mugabe out of the agreement.
It also means they will be hard pressed to get the African Union to think any differently because the continental bloc acts in sync with Sadc's resolutions.
Further compounding Mr Tsvangirai's headache is the revelation that the South African government told America's
Frazer that they viewed the US as a bully with no respect for Sadc's initiatives in Zimbabwe.
According to an official in the South African Embassy in Harare, Frazer last month tried to convene a meeting with President Motlanthe and Cde Mbeki during her regional tour but eventually settled for an audience with one of the facilitators in the talks.
In the meeting with Cde Sydney Mufamadi, who is part of Cde Mbeki's team, she insinuated that South Africa was arm-twisting the rest of the region to be "soft on President Mugabe".
She admitted that the September 15 agreement was "a good framework" but the US would not allow it to be implemented as long as President Mugabe was involved because "Tsvangirai was too weak" to work with the Zimbabwean leader.
Frazer -- a former US Ambassador to South Africa -- said Mr Tsvangirai was "no Odinga" and would not be able to "handle President Mugabe" and so the latter would have to step aside and appoint someone else to represent Zanu-PF in the inclusive Government.
"She effectively said the US would only recognise a weak Zanu-PF leader who would make it easier for Tsvangirai to pursue their agenda in the country and the region.
"Frazer wanted Sadc to persuade President Mugabe to step aside and she claimed the rest of the region agreed with this but was afraid to confront South Africa.
"Mufamadi responded to her saying 'Zimbabwe is not in Latin America, it is not your backyard. It is Sadc's backyard and Sadc knows best what Zimbabwe needs. This is not an American issue. What gives you the status of declaring veto over a Sadc decision? Who are you?
"You say that South Africa is bullying the rest of Sadc but the truth is that you are the real bullies. You go to countries that depend on you for budgetary support and you ask them to give you their views on the Zimbabwe issue.
"'What kind of answer do you expect to get from them when they still want budgetary support from you? They will tell you what you want to hear'," he said.
The official added: "When Frazer pressed on Mufamadi became annoyed and told her pointblank to just instruct her man to join the inclusive Government and resolve his issues from inside for the sake of progress.
"Our Foreign Affairs Minister (Cde Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma) told her the same thing and she said she would take up the matter with them again when she returned from Lesotho. But that was the last that was seen of her in South Africa."
He said South African officials told Frazer that the US and Mr Tsvangirai were "acting as if their words were cast in stone like the Law of Moses and everyone should obey them".
After Frazer's visit, Washington's chief diplomat in South Africa, Eric Bost, tried to press home the line that President Mugabe should appoint "a weaker person" to take his place in the inclusive Government.
In a letter to the Star newspaper on January 6, 2008, Bost wrote: "We are calling on the leaders of the Sadc to unite strongly and publicly in their call for Mugabe to step down and give the political parties in the country space to work together."
Zimbabwe's Ambassador to South Africa, Cde Simon Khaya Moyo, said the letter demonstrated American arrogance and lack of respect in trying to tell Sadc what to do.
"The United States ambassador must surely know that Sadc leaders do not take orders from Jendayi Frazer or from Washington. It is baffling that Frazer continues to speak at cross-purposes with Sadc in clear defiance of African sentiment and the consistent advice that she received from all the South African leaders that she interacted with while in South Africa."
Cde Khaya Moyo said African leaders had shown a lot of restraint in the face of "provocative and insulting behaviour from the United States".
"In a further show of US ignorance and arrogance, the US ambassador in his letter calls on Sadc leaders to 'unite strongly and publicly in their call for Mugabe to step down . . . ' Sadc leaders have never at any point called for President Mugabe to step down. Not in the Sadc meetings; not in the resolutions adopted. Never!"
Read comments. Write your own.
Copyright © 2009 The Herald. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com). To contact the copyright holder directly for corrections — or for permission to republish or make other authorized use of this material, click here.
AllAfrica aggregates and indexes content from over 125 African news organizations, plus more than 200 other sources, who are responsible for their own reporting and views. Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica.
I agree with you Hokoyo, the type of leadership that has run the country for the past 28years hardly facilitated any signficant investment into the country so they have nothing to show. They want to blind people by claiming false circumstances such as travel bans as having hindered development in the country. HAPANA TOTALLY that Zanu PF can claim to have developed in this country. Evidence is there of the infrastructure they found and now laying derelict. Basa rekungo chema chete matumbu akazvimba. If we lose Zanu PF noone would starve or care.
This post was deleted because it contravenes AllAfrica's commenting guidelines.
This post was deleted because it contravenes AllAfrica's commenting guidelines.
This post was deleted because it contravenes AllAfrica's commenting guidelines.
Hollowjaw, all you ever do is come on here and say that the content of anyone who says anything against Mugabe is nonsense. Yet you have no argument to back up your comments. Its easy to simply come on here and say that peoples comments are nonsense. It takes an intelligent man to come on here and use logic and sensible argument to rebut another persons comments. But you never do it. You just come here and waste peoples time. It really is quite sad, and extremely childish. Nonsense here, nonsense there. No one even cares what you say anymore because you never have anything constructive to say.
And you always go and make yourself look even more stupid by signing if with some childish piece about where you are from. It really is pathetic.
This post was deleted because it contravenes AllAfrica's commenting guidelines.
Chokora “No” to both of your questions. I happen to comment first because I am a Zimbabwean and am very concerned about the situation in our country. “Juvenile palaver”? Call it what you will. I wish those with what you call “enquiring minds” would get a bit more cultured by probing into the true history of the Liberation Struggle of Zimbabwe, from Mbuya NeHanda to the present , as I have done. When we helped RG Mugabe to flee to Mozambique we knew what the goal was. When we channeled the Mhondoro Spirits to guide the “vakomana ne vasikana in the bushes of Rhodesia, we knew what the goal was. When we saw every family offering dear ones to die for The Liberation of Zimbabwe we also knew what the goal was. When we see Zimbabweans suffering from hunger, disease, unemployment, terrorism from fellow Zimbabweans, we repentant that the Chimurenga has been aborted by servants of foreign exploiters, whether they maybe British, Arabs, Asians, Americans or even fellow Africans like SA and SADC. A true Mhondoro can still channel the messages of Mbuya NeHanda today and tell you that the Zimbabwe Struggle has been hijacked because the Zimbabweans are suffering as never before and have to go into exile inorder to survive. Mbuya NeHanda died at the hands of the foreign oppressors saying that her bones will never rott until we got our LAND back. By LAND she MEANT not just physical land but also freedom from fear, health, education, employment, prosperity, development etc. Mugabe did not only kill the true liberators of Zimbabwe, he has also pushed Zimbabwe back to pre-stone age! The Bantus of Zimbabwe were civilized long before Europe and America and could travel to and from space with Zvitundumuseremusere. Are your enquiring minds well vested in these issues or are they brainwashed by Western Education?
See all comments (106).
Halo Mabasa Sasa And Sydney Kawadza! When you look at Zimbabwe and all its present ills, (nobody needs even to start listing them), and read this article from the Herald you will at least begin to understand why Zimbabwe is moribound. Mugabe is a failed leader because he and his ZANU-PF live in a fairy world. They are corrupt, cruel, selfish, ignorant and primitive bunch who have not even the minimun level of love for their fellow Africans. They believe in primitive superstitions, for example that it is the Whitemen in the UK and the USA who are responsible for all the ills of Zimbabwe. When they got the country from the Whites 28 years ago it was the pride of all Africa. They have “ruled” our country singlehandedly and have destroyed it. And they still blame the Whiteman for it! It is truly pathetic of the ZANU-Pathetic Front. How can they be patriots when they ruin their fatherland, kill their own relatives, enslave their own people, bring shame on their own race, send to exile their own countrymen? Oh that so many have to be so insane before the New Dawn! Oh that this bunch of criminals have to be repentant before Zimbabwe is truly free! My name is Hokoyo. I will be there when you heng by the feet! PS Zimbabwe has no legal government and therefore no opposition. The Herald cannot be a “government newspaper”! The Herald is a ZANU-Pathetic Front mouthpiece!