Twelve hours of marathon talks between Morgan Tsvangirai and Robert Mugabe failed to produce a deal Monday, after the ZANU PF leader refused to make concessions to the opposition.
South African President Kgalema Motlanthe, mediator Thabo Mbeki and Mozambican President Armando Guebeza did little to pressure the veteran dictator to loosen his grip on power. Tsvangirai called it, 'probably the darkest day of our lives' and said 'the very same outstanding issues on the agenda are the same issues that are creating this impasse.' However he still pledged his commitment to the deal, but only if his party got control of the Home Affairs Ministry, amongst other conditions.
Mugabe meanwhile was blaming Tsvangirai for throwing a spanner in the works and accused him of presenting new conditions. But he told journalists that talks between his party and the MDC would continue in Harare. Arthur Mutambara, who many feel is the biggest beneficiary of the deal, was clearly disappointed by the impasse and blamed both Tsvangirai and Mugabe. He said the two leaders were refusing to change their positions and that Zimbabwe deserved better leaders than either of them.
SADC Executive Secretary Tomaz Salamao described the talks as 'inconclusive' and announced that an emergency summit of the grouping will be held either in Botswana or South Africa, to try and resolve outstanding differences. So once again Zimbabweans have to wait.
The proposal that ZANU PF brought to the talks said that the MDC should join the government first, support the adoption of Constitutional Amendment 19, have Tsvangirai sworn in as Prime Minister and then sort out the allocation of ministries after the inauguration of the new cabinet. It also said that when the contracts of the incumbent governors end, or should vacancies arise, the posts will then be shared according to the formula agreed in the original deal. ZANU PF also says the MDC should submit a draft bill for discussion, which would explain the role of the newly created National Security Council. They want this draft by the 24th January 2009. All other outstanding issues would only be dealt with once the new government had been formed.
The MDC countered these proposals by insisting on the equitable distribution of ministerial portfolios, the appointment of governors and other senior appointments, the enactment of amendment 19 and the secession and reversal of all breaches to the agreement, before any government is formed.
The latter point was in relation to the abduction and detention of opposition and civil society activists which the MDC argues violated September's agreement. So while ZANU PF is saying 'come and join the government, we will resolve the difference later' the MDC is refusing to put 'the cart before the horse.' Spokesman Nelson Chamisa said, 'the key conflict areas needed to be resolved. It's crucial where there is mistrust. We do not want to go into a government as a ritual.'
Meanwhile church leaders from South Africa on Tuesday urged former President Thabo Mbeki to step down as mediator. Leaders from Catholic, Methodist, Anglican, Dutch Reformed, Lutheran and Rhema churches said, 'Mbeki is compromised and no longer suitable for the mediation process.' They accused SADC and the South African government of failing the people of Zimbabwe and Africa through their so-called quiet diplomacy. 'We respectfully call for the intervention of the African Union and the appointment of a new facilitator,' the group added.
Several other church leaders from the South African Council of Churches, notably Cardinal Wilfred Napier and Archbishop Thabo Makgoba, supported the statement saying Mugabe was holding onto 'illegitimate power.' South Africa's powerful Congress of South African Trade Unions also released a statement saying it is alarmed by the failure of the talks. COSATU said it was nearly 10 months since the people of Zimbabwe voted the MDC into office despite huge levels of intimidation, yet ZANU PF, the party that lost, is clearly refusing to agree to any new government that reduces their power. COSATU blamed SADC for treating Mugabe as a 'bonafide President' even though he lost the elections
Comments 1 to 5 of 95 Post a comment
Disgraced leaders who have no shame! Unwanted mediator continues for whose benefit? Crazy! And look who is trying to bring Mugabe to his senses - young leaders from modern generations..and he does not fell ashamed that he is now a great liability to the region! Not ashamed that much younger leaders now battle to reign him in! Now, this is madness, to appoint governers and preempt negotiations, then insist MDC must still join without reclaiming the governerships they so deserve. Continued subversion of the people's will. Just as Mbeki imposes himself on MDC, Zanu impose theselves as governors in cities where they clearly lost with wide margins. This is disgusting.
Tsvangirai has brought no good cause among his fellow countrymen. Just like Mugabe he continues to make us suffer. Bob might be old but not entirely stuppid. He is aware that if he conceeds the Home Affairs Min the MDC can get their hands on weapons easily and war can break out. Mugabe is afraid of being removed through war so he wont conceed that Ministry. Tsvangirai should negotiate with the lives of people in mind not his personal security.
Despite erasures, we shall soldier on.
The men and women of MDC should now throw Morgan under the bus, for it is quite clear that the tail of British Imperialism is still a child, with icy waters and raging storms (President Barack HUSSEIN Obama) in the horizon one should nip in the bud any and all childish games, according to Paulus, the Jewish founder of Christianity.
GLORY TO THE COMRADE MUGABE, A MAN, who does not dabble in "things childish." (President Barack Hussein Obama).
Your comments show how narrowminded you are. You obviously are sitting in the comfort of luxury, to think are using the same old tired British Imperial arguments. Most Africans are tired of that argument because it has not brought us anything but suffering at the hands of despots like Mugabe. Please educate yourself before you start making comments about something you know nothing about. If you have nothing constructive to say please refrain from posting anyhing. There are serious issues going on in Zimbabwe we do not need your imbeciles involved.
I've come to the conclusion that Jellyhead is actually anti-Mugabe. He's doing his best to pose as a Mugabe supporter and prove to the world that Mugabe supporters are brainless twats, with no logical argument. And the result, all Mugabe supporters get tarred with the same brush and look like twats too. Jellyhead is actually really good at what he does, making himself look like a fool, so I think we should really congratulate him for his good work in making Mugabe and his supporters look like the idiots they are.
See All Comments