Kelvin Odoobo
7 February 2009
opinion
Kigali — At the just concluded African Union summit, once again, the romanticised idea of a United States of Africa, trumpeted by the Libya's strongman Muammar al-Gaddhafi, now AU chairman, got some valuable airtime. It is not a new idea.
Kwame Nkrumah, at the attainment of Ghanaian independence championed the idea of the "USA" as a restoration of Africa's might against the colonial demarcation of the continent into artificial bits and pieces.
He himself did not rule long enough before he fell to Africa's chronic political problem of military coups which in some circles was said to be partly a result of western powers' unease of his pan-African ideologies.
In the wake of European integration, the economic might of China, a fast developing India, the Russian attempts to exercise control over independent territories formerly in the Soviet Union, and the dwindling economic means of the world's super power, the real USA- a United States of Africa would appear to balance the global political and economic equation for Africa.
The truth however is that Africa is further from being united in a political confederation than anyone may suppose. The common denominator of sub-Saharan Africa is colonialism and the quest to exploit Africa's resources alongside its poverty to satisfy foreign interests.
The cold war is a perfect example of how foreign powers attempted to set up offshore command posts for western proxies in Africa.
In Angola's long and bitter civil war, the cold war was played out in the battlefields long after it had officially ended.
Many of Africa's young nations have very challenging internal political issues that originate from colonial mistakes and require a long time before we can even think about integrating into a pan-African political federation.
In Europe, the distinct national identities can withstand Europeanisation. What about Africa's young and struggling national identities?
Even so, the recent referendum on EU policies have faced such challenges in countries like Ireland and France so much so that were it not for the unwavering commitment of political leaders, the EU would have been in doldrums.
In the interest of pan-Africanism, a form of economic union initially is necessary for Africa to compete favourably with other economic powers of the world and to avoid economic bullying by these powers as is the case with the current unfair rules of trade under the world trade organisation.
The East Africa Community (EAC), the South African Development Community (SADC) and Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA) are such good initiatives.
I believe that those initiates at African integration will eventually grow into each other to result in a powerful pan-Africa bloc that may eventually evolve on the lines of the European Economic Community to the European Union.
For all its good intentions, the current push for our own USA is bound to run into dangerous waters.
First, Gaddhafi interests in this union are very suspect. It is not long ago that he was hobnobbing with Arab colleagues and claiming that North Africa was more into the Arab world than in Africa. He strongly championed pan-Arabism and pan-Islamism until when it was clear that it was simply not going to happen.
This new comradeship which he has developed for black African nations indicates that perhaps he has seen the light.
He talks pan-africanism at the AU summit while he is smooching with traditional African leaders who in various nations present potential political complications to their elected governments.
It should also raise eyebrows that the king of Benin is already refereeing to him as the "King of Kings."
Gaddhafi, for all his long respected statesmanship and wise guidance of Libya, is not famous for his democratic ideals.
Africa shouldn't be the excuse for Gaddhafi's project to repatriate his international image.
We need to make a united stand as Africa in face of globalisation in order to survive the vicious cycle of poverty, and conflicting foreign interests that are apart from our own interests.
But hastily planned and executed United States of Africa will have similar or worse consequences than the partition of Africa.
Read comments. Write your own.
Copyright © 2009 The New Times. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com). To contact the copyright holder directly for corrections — or for permission to republish or make other authorized use of this material, click here.
AllAfrica aggregates and indexes content from over 125 African news organizations, plus more than 200 other sources, who are responsible for their own reporting and views. Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica.
US of Africa is just nonsense at this stage of the development of african countries. It is even worse with somebody like Muammar al-Gaddhafi. As said by Kelvin Gaddhafi interest for africa is suspect. I think that he should go back to his arab/muslim brothers and try to get them united. We africans from the sub-saharian africa do not have anything in comon with the countries from the north of africa(Morocco, Ageria, Libya, Tunisia, Egypt and te arab part of Sudan). I don't how can we ever belong to a same federation. With the arabs from the north it will never work. We can just se the conditions of life and decriminations the blacks living in the northern part of africa live.
I thing that the sub-sharian countries must concentrate their own streghtening and in the streghtening of regional organizations like ECOWAS, SADC etc.
I think we should not waste our time considering the support given to Gaddhafi by puppets like the king of benin or other local leaders and even some of the head of states of west africa and SEN-SAD. These are only some poor and miserable people. They are supporting Gaddahafi for some miserable dollar notes nothing else. They can sell their mother for and theys soul for money. A Shame they are
A US of Africa can only be possible when the Protestants are brave men and women of valor. The west will never allow such strong economic block to exist; instead the west is bent on putting its international finance systems to run the entirety of Africa.
If Gaddafi has international image ambitions then Africa must exploit that NOW. Leaders are not born every season. Its past time Africa needs ONE voice that confronts global challenges racking havoc in our kitchens. I know African heroes and statesmen will be those who want to clip Gaddafi’s wings while putting the continent further into abyss. Heroes must not be those who have statues in the western world nor those with western decorated pieces of paper designed as recognitions to their accomplishments for western “international” interests.
This is going to be one hell of a giant continental circus act, with its attendant orgies of decadence that ends up achieving nothing.
It is going to be a profligate (power)"drunken sailsman" looking for where to hang his hat.
By the way I also read in the New York Times where Gaddaffi proposes that Isreal and Palestine become one state called Isratine.
Gaddaffi is determined to have his impact whatever that will be - rewritting the world map, and recreating and renaming nations, however crassly he goes about it.
I agree with onesoulzim1, the united states of Africa is a good idea, and i hope it happens soon. I am looking forward to that passport to travel the continent from north to south and east to west without restrictions. It will provide us with new opportunities and challenges. This is exactly what we need to overcome the present chaos across the continent. We need this one voice and one goal to focus on the problems that are common to all countries in Africa. We do not necessarily have to move every obstacle before establishing a united states of africa. People like Uguiss should realise that most African countries will never reach that ideal stage of development that is being proposed before a US of Africa is put together. So lets stop wasting time, and take the step to move forward now.