Freetown — The Special Court for Sierra Leone has received US$6.5 million in new contributions - enough, court registrar Herman von Hebel says, to avoid a shortfall that could have enabled former Liberian leader and war crimes defendant Charles Taylor to go free.
In March the court forecasted that funds would run out at the end of April, leading to concern that Taylor's trial could be delayed or discontinued, according to Special Court (SCSL) prosecutor Stephen Rapp.
"I could have the best evidence in the world, I could have the strongest advocacy, but if we ran out of funds, the court might have to let the accused go," Rapp told IRIN.
"You can't hold them if you don't have the resources to finish the trial. I don't want that to happen."
The recent donations will allow the court to continue functioning through June, according to von Hebel. Other contributions are expected to come through in the coming months. The court has said it needs $28 million for 2009.
Anger
Many Sierra Leoneans are angry at how much the court has cost. "My whole family was displaced during the war. I needed money to build a new home, to send my children to school, to feed my family - we are living in poverty here. What has been the point of all this spending [on the court]? Why does it need more money?" Alison Turay, who lives in Kroo Bay slum in the capital, Freetown, told IRIN.
Victims of the conflict in Makeni, 120km east of Freetown, told IRIN that while they supported the work of the Special Court, programmes to help Sierra Leoneans recover their lives should also not be overlooked by donors.
Up to 100,000 Sierra Leoneans - among them amputees and other war-wounded, victims of sexual violence, war widows and children who are eligible for post-war reparations - have yet to receive any compensation. The National Commission for Social Action (NACSA), which is running the reparations programme, has less than $3.5 million to run the programme in 2009-10 - far less than the $14 million it requires.
I could have the best evidence in the world, I could have the strongest advocacy, but if we ran out of funds, the court might have to let the accused go
Funding voluntary
Unlike the international tribunals for Rwanda and the former Yugoslavia, where funding by UN members is stipulated, funding for the Special Court for Sierra Leone - a unique hybrid national/international body - is voluntary.
The SCSL's mandate is also limited, focusing on "persons who bear the greatest responsibility for serious violations of international humanitarian law and Sierra Leonean law" from 1996 to the end of the 11-year civil war in January 2002. Thirteen people were indicted by the court.
Financial squeeze
Von Hebel said sluggish funding does not mean dwindling support for the court's work. "The political will is still there, but the financial means are more limited."
With similar tribunals now starting in Lebanon and Cambodia, there is more demand for money for international justice at a time when donors are facing the global financial crunch, Dominic Stanton with the British High Commission in Freetown told IRIN.
The last trial to be held in Sierra Leone is nearing completion; three former leaders of the rebel Revolutionary United Front were sentenced on 8 April and appeals are expected to be completed by October. Charles Taylor's trial is taking place in The Hague.
Von Hebel expects Taylor's trial to wrap up at the end of 2009, with sentencing and appeals continuing through 2010.
The court's budget will drop to $12.7 million in 2010, he said.
[ This report does not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations ]
Comments 1 to 5 of 5 Post a comment
It is a big shame, the way resources have been wasted by UN and Secial Court. Over 500 Mllion USDollars to try 3 or 4 criminals??/, which even an ordinary Magistrate or Judge could have done.All involved in the so called Court are guilty of depriving poor and starving Sierra Leoneans of these funding, which could have gone towards their rehabilitation.UN should be ashamed of themselves on paying out 500 million dollars as salary to a handfull of Lawyers and Judges.
Just keep it cool! How come you allow your prosecutor to pay your Defense Lawyers? That's the secret Dude. It means those criminals will face the jails in Rwanda and Britain, and after that,we'll talk on reparation for the people of Sierra Leone.
The court was making a big joke at first,by telling us of the lack of funds to continue Taylor's Trail.To all the folks, "rest in peace". Taylor will go to the Kingdom of London, where he will see the "return of the great Mac-Aurthur" or he will tell the people of LIB,that by God's willing he's not back.
Although the facts presented by the Prosecution in the Charles Taylor trial don't warrant a conviction. I am glad that the Court has found enough funds to keep the trial going. Watch and listen to Charles Taylor's account of events when he takes the stand. You all will be convinced that he does not bear the greatest responsibility for what happened to Sierra Leone
"In the name of the Father,the Son and the Holy Ghost.Give us this day our daily bread. Forgive those who did trespass against us.Protect us forever,from those cutlasses,which they used to chop the limbs of our people.But kindly deliver them to the hells of London prisons and Kigali. Amen!"
We are surely waiting to see. Seven down one to go.You'll beat the clock towers in New York when the verdict is dashed on your man. In the maintime there's dinner in fourteen days with Defense Lawyer Griffith. There's money now so he'll get his pay.
Now that the Court has oxygen, it is time to bring in more defendants, Tejan Kabba, for one and, second, the denizens of "Kamajors," plus a few well-known "turncoat" 'journalists.' (In soupist Sierra Leone, the most disgraceful 'profession' is prostitution, followed by a sublimated modality of prostitution---politicians, and then 'journalists').
Next, Annan should be indicted for backing Kabba; and next, some folks in the Ivory Coast for giving sanctuary to Taylor in the the now moribund little Paris in soupist West Africa; and, finally, Gadaffi, along with the ignoramus in Burkiana Faso, should be hauled in for having started the whole damn thing.
Fianlly, some well-known citizens of INVADER BRITAIN ought to indicted.
After all, the victims deserve justice, complete justice, don't they?