Zachary Lomo
21 May 2009
opinion
Around 40,000 Burundian refugees face involuntary repatriation when Tanzania’s Mtabila refugee camp is closed at the end of June, writes Zachary Lomo. Officials have told refugees that ‘if they are still in the camp after 30 June, they will be beaten and forced to run empty-handed to Burundi’.
Although the camp schools have been closed and the markets destroyed, very few refugees have registered to return home. There is no longer fighting in Burundi but many refugees fear the reprisal killing of anyone suspected of supporting opposition groups, as well as disputes over property. Tanzanian field officers claim they have no plans to force the refugees to return to Burundi and will negotiate the integration and naturalisation of those unwilling or unable to go back with the Tanzanian government.
Mtabila refugee camp, home to some 40,000 Burundian refugees, is reportedly to be closed by the end of June and all of inhabitants are threatened with involuntary repatriation.
On 8 May I received the first telephone call of several here in Cambridge from a desperate refugee whom I had met last November in Mtabila. He said a Tanzanian official has told them that if 30 June elapses and they are still in the camp, they will be beaten and forced to run, empty-handed to Burundi; they had better heed the last and final call and register and get a ‘dignified’ chance to return to their country. Despite such threat, he said very few had registered to return. Nevertheless, secondary schools have been closed and the markets have been destroyed. He also said that security had been beefed up as more police were being brought into the camp. Although no refugee is allowed to leave the camp, according to my caller, some people are managing to escape, fleeing towards Uganda and Kenya.
Apparently the Burundians’ fate was already sealed in 2007 when the UNHCR and the Tanzanian and Burundi governments signed a Tripartite Agreement under the Cessation Clause, a provision of the 1951 Refugee Convention, which stipulates six conditions when refugee status ceases. The Cessation clause can be invoked if any of the six conditions has occurred. Under the fifth condition (Article 1 C (5), often shortened to ‘ceased circumstances’ clause, and upon which the repatriation agreement was based, a person ceases to be a refugee if the causes of flight in the home country have dramatically changed for the better. Even then, the same provision of Article 1 C (5) stipulates that a refugee can ‘invoke compelling reasons arising out of previous persecution for refusing to avail him of the protection of the country of nationality…’ In other words, the cessation clause does not apply to automatically; a refugee who has reason to fear persecution – reprisals, revenge killings, including deprivation of his or her land – in his country of origin, cannot be forced to return to that country.
When I was conducting research in Mtabila in November 2008, rumours of camp closure and forced repatriation were rife. In fact, this was the main concern of refugees I interviewed. They feared Tanzania would use the army as they did back in 1996. Refugees acknowledge there is no fighting in Burundi, but they still fear continuing reprisal killing that will affect anyone suspected of supporting any of the myriad opposition groups. They also fear the disputes that will arise over their property; disputes that are inevitable in an overcrowded country where all unoccupied houses or land gets taken over by those who get there first. Those who have most to fear are the descendants of the 1972 expulsion from Burundi. Not having been born in Burundi, they have nothing to return to. One man who had made a brief visit to Burundi said he would never take his family of five children back because they might all die in one swoop of a grenade attack. He had seen his relatives who were killed and their houses destroyed by grenades.
Last November, I also met with the head of the Field Office in Kasula, Tanzania and he reassured me that they were not planning to force the Burundians to return. They would ‘screen’ those who were unwilling or unable to go back and negotiate with the Tanzanian government concerning their integration and naturalization. Apparently such precautions have not been taken if the refugee who called me is an example.
Government officers were less accessible, but when I managed to meet one junior officer, he did admit that there were problems that arose because those involved in making tripartite agreements ‘were not conversant with issues on the ground’ and that ‘for UNHCR repatriation was a priority’. He admitted that his office had been ‘directed that no more new arrivals will be accepted because it undermines the current repatriation programme.’
Kasulu, and the Kigoma region – the location of most refugees in Tanzania – are too far away from the capital for any journalist to report on. I can only hope that this mobile phone call will be sufficient alert.
* Zachary Lomo is currently reading for his doctorate in international law and refugees at the University of Cambridge.
* Please send comments to editor@pambazuka.org or comment online at http://www.pambazuka.org/.
Read comments. Write your own.
Copyright © 2009 Fahamu. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com). To contact the copyright holder directly for corrections — or for permission to republish or make other authorized use of this material, click here.
AllAfrica aggregates and indexes content from over 125 African news organizations, plus more than 200 other sources, who are responsible for their own reporting and views. Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica.
It seemed to be unfair as well as disrespectful of human being's right. It is hard to believe who tells the truth but the best way of getting to know what is happening, is to get there and hear from refugees not to be receiving phone calls because there are who who have not an access to make cphone call but he/she can talk and the told by 'officers' sometimes somewhere officers talk like I don't care or if they've met all they want then that's all for them.
I would like to call for the Government of Tanzania, Africa' ountries, UN, UNHCR and many more International Organisations together find solution for this situation facing by Burundian refugees in Tanzania. To look at what refugees have does not promise good life to anyone who may came to take it by force. I would say that africa's leaders have special ways of saying things, they always admit and confirm that their countries are fine especially when it come on security issues while people inside are getting finished. Every time i read news on the internet regarding Burundi, there is violence issues so who likes it? Please if 'Tanzania' and Tanzania's army with all Tanzanians could you give break for this people. WHAT THEY WANT IS JUST TO LIVE PEACEFULLY unless, if they do not do as want you get them fair punishment accordingly it is worths it for someone who deserved it. Worldwide peace seems to be problem for peaceful people live with fear because they haven't got peace. I am glad to hear that more army force has been deployed nearby refugee'camps by meaning they (refugees) are well protected. I've red articles regards Burundian Refugees in Tanzania that those who did not want to return were taken to the United States of America..hope that that will happen to all Burundi refugees in Tanzania. I normally like africa's news, but when we years of 1996-2000 many refugees from Tanzania, DRC etc. were sent to their home countries as women and men and children but i was so shocked when when some people coming from in those countries saying that "if you are in them you most see women and girls men and boys are rarely been seing" and as they returned the security, sanitation living conditions were all guaranteed to the world then why, did they get what they were told, isn't going to be the same as well if Burundi Refugees are sent by force somehow in Burundi? Many Burundians were returned home years of 1989-1993 did they enjoy that country? Whoever feels now not going back to Burundi she/he has specifics reasons that need attention and when time comes right to every burundian refugees around the world will leave one by one till the camps will shutdown without means of powers as it is been commented in Tanzania and IF AFRICA IS ONE WHY A MAN CANNOT LIVE WHERE HE FEELS THE MOST SUITABLE FOR HIM MAYBE ONE DAY IN OVERSEAS COUNTRIES.
I think what some refugees said over into air may be the truth, the world should look at the situation in Burundi by itself where such bit of land it is compared with problems-are bigger than the land. It is believed that Burundi has numerous things to deal with better than calling for people into the country while problems are there yet not solved. The country itself will get helped by International Organisations but individuals will always live on their own will and for me, wherever a burundian is living being happy i should let him live with consolations and if i am the government of Burundi i would be very happy to receive any burundian coming back home because home is home.
Appolinaire, South Africa in Durban
These are correct and true stories which is mis understandable, these people suppose to have the right as human being. Tanzania have the right the land but we would love to know what UNHCR is offering those burundian refugees as protection. burundi has been in civil war since 1972. till now. many people i have met from burundi do not like to go back only reason is that there no peace still. why thse refugees do not have any option?