Inter Press Service (Johannesburg)

Africa: 'Africa Should Seize Control of Its Development'

Geneva — Colonisation can be blamed for Africa's underdevelopment but today Africans must take their fate in their own hands and become ambitious. The continent badly needs industrialisation but it has fallen back into the trap of merely exporting commodities because of booming prices.

These are the innovative statements made by some of the region's highest decision-makers at the first African Forum for Dialogue, organised by the African Union in Geneva under the heading "Africa's Development: Whose Responsibility?" on May 27.

"I am angry because Africa is in such a bad way," said a passionate Kandeh Yumkellah, the director general of the United Nations Industrial Development Organisation (UNIDO). "We are paying the price for other people's mistakes, like climate change and the financial crisis, but whose responsibility is it?

"Ours! We are educated. We can blame colonialism for the past 350 years but, for the next 50, we are responsible."

It was a sentiment also shared by Jean Ping, chairperson of the African Union Commission. "But it doesn't mean that we don't need the rest of the world. We live in a globalised world and need to open up," he added.

Speaker after speaker stressed that Africa needed to become more self-reliant. But they also called for the strengthening of development cooperation. It is not a contradiction. It is all about development cooperation that takes into account the choices of the countries concerned.

Yumkellah cited the following model: "In Asia, the mantra is competitiveness, and then you create the roads and the port facilities you need. In Africa we talk everyday about crisis and poverty and our minds become small. Let's be ambitious! Deng Xiao Ping said: I want China to be the powerhouse of the world in thirty years. And today it is."

With the increase in commodity prices, Jean Ping remarked that trade terms are favourable to Africa for the first time in a century.

But Yumkellah warned: "Suddenly we are addicted to commodity trade again. But where is the value added? How do you create jobs if you don't have the manufacturing base? Manufacturing must take place in Africa - otherwise we will not cope with the huge forecasted growth in population."

Africa is perceived as irrelevant in globalisation because its contribution to manufacturing is less than three percent. And 70 percent of global trade takes place in this sector.

For the dynamic Sierra Leonean, Africans want to talk about transformation and not only about the wars in Darfur and the Congo. "But they (the North) don't want to," he says.

"The Gulf of Guinea is one of the richest regions in the world but it has the poorest countries. Fishers are coming in from outside and over-fishing the waters. Let's pray that young men and women will not become the next pirates.

"Development assistance today is not about aid, but how you make Africa competitive to create jobs, otherwise our children will leave for the North."

He expressed regret that the continent was again missing an opportunity: "The third industrial revolution is green. We financed the first one with the slave trade. Let us not let the new industrial revolution pass us by," he added, pointing to the lack of interest and debate over green technologies and jobs on the continent.

Patricia Francis, the executive director of the International Trade Centre, agreed with the other speakers: "Aid in itself will not ensure development. We should be looking at a new path for development and not at the way people have done in the past that will take us back."

What is more, Africa needs a new business model that commits all stakeholders to address the issues of market access, protectionism, export finance, fluctuation in exchange rates and unemployment. The private sector plays a central role in these partnerships, together with international organisations.

But, once more, the vision for development on the continent can come only from Africans themselves.

For Nicolas Imboden, president of the Swiss-African Chamber of Commerce, foreign capital is already there. "In 2008, Africa was on top of the list of all regions in terms of private sector investment," he noted.

"Thanks to foreign direct investment, a 140 percent increase has taken place in projects, a 146 percent increase in capital investment and a 100 percent increase in job creation (over the past two years). No other region has experienced such incredible growth. Africa is back on the investors' scene and economics professors should go back to school."

But when looking more closely at the quality of this investment, there is a clear deficit in the manufacturing sector. Africa's comparative advantages are in raw material, not in manufacturing, because of small markets and low income and purchasing power.

And the continent is not cheap: infrastructure is bad, electricity and transportation expensive and security still generates very high costs. And in terms of asset seeking, there are very few assets you can merge or acquire.

The solution is to enhance the competitiveness of human resources and strive to regional integration trough infrastructure, the meeting heard. Even after the crisis, Africa's economy is expected to grow by 2,8 percent in 2009. "While Europe is sick, Africa just caught a cold. The right measures are in place and we can hope for more investment," concluded Imboden on a positive note.

Regional integration is the way forward for Abdoulie Janneh, the executive secretary of the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA).

Another key requirement is to increase Africa's productive base. Since agriculture represents the largest part of gross domestic product, the first step is to foster agricultural productivity by providing credit to small-scale farmers and too improve electricity and water supply, roads and telecommunication.

In March 2009, UNECA helped establish the Pan-African Alliance for E-Commerce to better harness intra-African trade. This currently forms only 10 percent of countries' total exports. The project is meant to improve the flow of information, for example regarding documentation required by the different government authorities.

"The call for Africa to rely on its own strengths is very new," Martin Malusa, a non-governmental organisation representative, told IPS. "Coming from the highest decision-makers, it is extremely important. Civil society will have to hold them to their promises and make sure they fully take on their responsibility."


Copyright © 2009 Inter Press Service. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com). To contact the copyright holder directly for corrections — or for permission to republish or make other authorized use of this material, click here.

AllAfrica aggregates and indexes content from over 130 African news organizations, plus more than 200 other sources, who are responsible for their own reporting and views. Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica.

Comments 1 to 5 of 5 Post a comment

  • 2bwise
    May 29 2009, 12:15

    This article is basing all of economics on factory output which is only half-way correct. Economics should never be narrowly-defined as factory-output. Economics has always been defined as the trade of goods &/or services of equal value. Anybody with common-sense knows that people still have to have food,furnished shelter,clothing & transportation. These are the products that all those factories process. The point I'm trying to make is that factories still have to "sell what they produce". What people don't understand is that the manufactoring sector is current suffering from "over-competiton". The "key to success" is in identifying "consumer-demand" for those products. One particular demand,that Africa could take advantage of, is agricultural exports to the Middle-East,the reason being that the Middle-East doesn't have any irrigation water to produce enough food with even though they can sell enough oil to pay for their imported food. This is why Africans should not only look into but pursue as a course of action.

  • Steve Klaber
    May 29 2009, 12:21

    Yes, absolutely! The African peoples must take charge of their own development and resources. You have enormous resources to exploit in a greener, saner way than in the past. But first, you must save your forests and wetlands, or all else is for nought. Your forest are menaced mostly by yourselves, being overharvested for timber and charcoal. Your wetlands are being conquered by aquatic weeds such as water hyacinth and typha. Their control and clearance are imperative. They are sucking your continent dry. Aquatic weeds can be harvested for fuel, sometimes for food. Typha, in particular, is good feedstock for charcoal or ethanol production. The troubles these plants cause your nations are manifold. Use and absorb your labor glut fixing your wetlands, and your wetlands will water your drylands.

  • chokora
    May 29 2009, 16:51

    " .. the innovative statements made by some of the region's highest decision-makers at the first African Forum for Dialogue, organised by the African Union in Geneva .."

    "innovative"?

    There goes AllAfrica AGAIN!

    When did Africa say that we want to be dependent? Did Lumumba issue such a statement - so as to justify his slaughter by the europeans?

    And why would AU organize a meeting to discuss Africa's affairs, behold, in EUROPE - the land of Africa's historical predators who are currently starving Zimbabwe's kids to death?

    [When will the EU organize a meeting in Arusha to discuss Europe's security?]

  • foryohjonathan0000
    May 31 2009, 11:59

    My dear brother or sister; you are absolutely RIGHT. Europe have NEVER discuss their poitical nor their economic development in Arusha or the Africa Continent. Europeans see this has domination and inferiority. If so, why Africans doing such a thing in they eyes of the wickest of all people on Earth; the racist rich europeans. Africans (the Elites, or Decission Makers for Africa) must start thinking twice where to spread the news or hold an organizational meeting concerning Africa development, advancement, industralization etc. I think after 350yrs or so, if Africans do not learn; they WILL NEVER learn again. It times Africans wake and smell the burnt black coffee. May God Bless Africa

    Your Brother in Christ and Allah

  • chokora
    May 31 2009, 01:12

    Kandeh Yumkellah, "We are educated. We can blame colonialism for the past 350 years but, for the next 50, we are responsible." It was a sentiment also shared by Jean Ping, .. "

    These are good worst examples of compromised "leaders" who are foisted on victimized Africans by the predatory whites.

    We assume that these "leaders" access the news available in their local print media and on the internet.

    "we are responsible"!

    Do these clowns live with us on earth?

    What happens when the native dares take responsibility and control of their own destiny? Economic sanctions. Invasions. Regime Change. DEATH.

    As such, they are aware of the native being killed in the Niger delta of Nigeria because they dare claim any share of the over US$30,000,000,000 a year that foreign oil companies haul out of Nigeria every year.

    What are these "leaders" (unto the African Child's extermination} doing about it?

    African does NOT need foreign armies from belligerent countries on its soil. Neither would France welcome Chinese soldiers and large Chinese bases on its motherland. Suppose the African Child decided to close all the foreign bases in most of African countries - and surrounding the African continent? Death.

    Take responsibility indeed. And this twaddle coming from those "leaders" who are PRESUMABLY wise! [And on the African Child's expense account! Ddaammm Lethu Mshini Wami! ]