UN Integrated Regional Information Networks

Zimbabwe: Recovery Will Cost More

Johannesburg — The international humanitarian community has increased its donor appeal for Zimbabwe by over 30 percent to better reflect the depth of need in the ongoing crisis.

"Clearly, significant changes in the country's political and socio-economic landscape have occurred since January 2009," the United Nations Humanitarian Coordinator for Zimbabwe, Agostinho Zacarias, said at the launch on 1 June of the revised Consolidated Appeals Process (CAP) 2009 in the capital, Harare.

The need to revise the CAP, the most important tool for raising resources for humanitarian action, had become apparent by early March, when the initial appeal for US$550 million had ballooned to around $719 million needed to support the key areas of agriculture, health, education, food aid and safe water.

A country-wide cholera outbreak and a spike in food insecurity during the lean season had "aggravated an already difficult socio-economic environment of hyperinflation and collapsed basic social services," the CAP said.

Six million people had limited or no access to safe water and sanitation; 1.5 million children required support to access education; 800,000 people were in need of food aid, and 44,000 children younger than five years needed treatment for severe acute malnutrition.

Priscilla Misihairabwi-Mushonga, Minister of Regional Integration and International Cooperation, said the government recognized that "the social-economic situation in Zimbabwe would have deteriorated to levels that could easily have lead to social unrest" without the support of the international community.

"The revised CAP comes at a time where Zimbabwe has moved into a new context, not only politically, but also socially and economically."

The formation in February 2009 of the Inclusive Government - comprising President Mugabe's ZANU-PF, and the opposition Movement for Democratic Change - led to the Short-Term Emergency and Recovery Programme (STERP), which had "paved the way for the country's rehabilitation," the CAP said.

Beyond humanitarian

While the CAP is a strictly "humanitarian" financing tool, and thus traditionally restricted to short-term emergency needs, the revised version tried to bridge the gap between humanitarian and development work in the new Zimbabwean context. "Essentially, the revision reflects a combination of new opportunities and deepening needs," the document noted.

Previous appeals had underlined the need for assistance in water and sanitation, health, education and protection, but "most sectors continued to suffer from lack of support - it is from there that the concept of 'humanitarian plus' activities emerges in this revision, including activities that are transitional in nature, but which ... are considered time-critical and life-saving."

Misihairabwi-Mushonga noted: "This revised CAP takes into cognizance the expressed need for Zimbabwe to move from the humanitarian-support stage to the recovery stage - 'Humanitarian plus' simply means Zimbabwe is no longer a country in crisis but a country in recovery."

The CAP document was less optimistic: "In spite of the positive impact of the humanitarian response and initiatives by the Inclusive Government, the international community remains relatively cautious."

It is uncertain whether the revised CAP will translate into more funding; at $246 million the initial appeal was still only 45 percent funded by the end of May, and more than half that amount was carried over from 2008, with an aditional 18 million coming from money available in the UN Central Emergency Response Fund. Actual funding to the CAP was therefore only 17 percent, compared to 25 percent at the same time a year ago.

The STERP, too, remains underfunded. Of the $18.4 billion required until the end of 2009, by April African governments had pledged only $400 million in credit lines.

[ This report does not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations ]


Copyright © 2009 UN Integrated Regional Information Networks. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com). To contact the copyright holder directly for corrections — or for permission to republish or make other authorized use of this material, click here.

AllAfrica aggregates and indexes content from over 130 African news organizations, plus more than 200 other sources, who are responsible for their own reporting and views. Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica.

Comments 1 to 4 of 4 Post a comment

  • carlos4
    Jun 2 2009, 09:45

    Uncle Bob is hoping for more help under his Barbecue Plus plan. In addition to prime angus cattle, he is appealing for 30 percent more to be donated in the form of chickens, goats, whatever the nordics are willing to give up. Its been reported by some that in addition to the Zanugoons strong arming the subjects for any foreign currency they might have left over from that $$100 per month, they are confiscating any and all glazes and sauces from storeshelves in anticipation. Shoppers are warned against purchasing such items lest they be suspected of using them at clandestine roasts funded by the opposition or rhoadies.

  • mrzyphl
    Jun 2 2009, 16:29

    That isn't recovery funds it's welfare. Our resources provide basic sustenance for people that Mugabe couldn't care less about. He has enough farmers in his back pocket to provide enough BBQ beef, chicken and corn to everyone that keeps him in power.

  • afric35
    Jun 3 2009, 01:27

    Noble1 I completely agree with you because it is simply welfare that will never end but they talk about a recovery program well Mugabe has been in charge for almost 30 years and still are recovering I guess. They will want us to give them money for the rest of their lives because they can call it what they wish but it is simply welfare. Sadly for much of Southern Africa this is happening and they depend on outside sources to survive. Our faults is there is no accountability to where all this money that comes in goes. Every Aid agency is tied to the governments so it is easy to figure out the rest..

  • juhlman
    Jun 2 2009, 16:26

    Wow! Not surprisingly, no one is offering to support STERP and the revised CAP!

    With the current situation in the GNU, there is NO money for Zimbabwe! SADC has basically sold Zimbabwe a bill of goods blindly hoping that the "racist" West would pull out it's checkbook to pay for an alleged "African solution for an African problem".

    Earlier this year, the CAP was only $500M U.S. - of that amount, only $250M U.S. was actually raised (including a carryover from 2008!). Now they have increased CAP by 50%, but yet are only recieving $3M here and $10M there.

    STERP allegedly requires $8.3B U.S. - how much has been raised? $400M in lines of credit!

    So, out of a total of roughly $9B U.S. combined between STERP and CAP needed to assist in Zimbabwe's recovery from the wasteland ZANU-PooF has turned it into, they've managed to raise roughly $750M! Only 8% of the total need of Zimbabwe - why is that?

    Whatever ZANU-PooF and their supporters may think of it, the rest of the real world has clearly reached their verdict on whether ZANU-PF had actually changed by their behaviour since the "Government" was assembled.

    Very simply, until ZANU-PooF stops standing in the way of change, agrees to the return of the rule of law and transparency, there is NO money for Zimbabwe.

    For those who cry about "sanctions", shut up! Just as you complain that "outsiders" interfere in Zimbabwe, who "We" decide to do business with is our own affair - not yours..........

    "Total Empowerment!" Oh yes, Comrade Bob promised Zimbabwe Total Empowerment - how's that working out........