Harare — THIS country is in serious trouble. If ever there were any doubts as to how much trouble this nation is in, yesterday's action by MDC-T should have dispelled any debate on the matter.
After President Mugabe called for a Cabinet meeting yesterday morning, MDC-T decided that it would not attend this very important aspect of the management of the Executive's business in Zimbabwe.
Their reason, in a nutshell, is that President Mugabe should not have called for Cabinet on a Monday when it is traditionally held on Tuesdays.
MDC-T is the second largest party in the inclusive Government.
The party leader is the Prime Minister of Zimbabwe, meaning that he is the most senior Minister in the Government appointed by President Mugabe.
The party's deputy leader is the Deputy Prime Minister of Zimbabwe.
Their secretary-general is the Minister of Finance in the same President Mugabe-appointed Government.
By any measure, the Global Political Agreement that caused the creation of the inclusive Government can have no legal or practical force without the active involvement of Prime Minister Tsvangirai's party.
But at the same time, the importance of MDC-T to the functionality of the inclusive Government should not make anyone from that party -- or from any other for that matter -- think that they can hold the rest of the nation at ransom.
Yesterday, MDC-T deputy president and one of Zimbabwe's two Deputy Prime Ministers, Madam Thokozani Khupe said her party would not attend Monday's Cabinet meeting.
Her list of gripes was as long as it reflected the standard fare issued by the party since the inclusive Government was constituted after President Mugabe swore Mr Tsvangirai into office as Prime Minister.
She spoke of a "lack of paradigm shift on the part of Zanu-PF" because Dr Gideon Gono was still the Governor of the Reserve Bak of Zimbabwe and Mr Johannes Tomana is still the Attorney-General.
She insinuated that all the members of her party that are in Cabinet could not attend yesterday's meeting because Roy Bennet had not yet been sworn into office as the Deputy Minister of Agriculture.
She suggested that as long as the list of Provincial Governors had not been amended to suit the views of MDC-T then a Cabinet meeting could not be held.
And, of course, there was the obligatory mention of abductions, arrests, victimisation, land invasions and general campaign of violence against her party's supporters, activists and functionaries.
And after all that she had to say The Herald and ZBC were continuing to "churn our vitriol and propaganda"!
But that was only the tip of the iceberg.
The conclusion of her press conference can be described as nothing short of trying to hold the nation at ransom.
"However," she said, "whilst we remain fundamentally committed to the GPA in the interests of our people, it is our own constitutional right to consider disengagement."
Then she invoked Christ's name to remove "toxicity and insanity" from the GPA, which two unwanted elements -- from the entire tone of her presentation -- are emanating from Zanu-PF alone.
What is at play here may be nothing short of mere politicking and public posturing, or it could be something much worse, much more sinister.
After all, why would Ms Khupe, Mr Tsvangirai's deputy in MDC-T, speak of abductions a few days after her boss was quoted by BBC's Radio One raising skepticism about the existence of extra-judicial detentions?
In that interview (whose transcript, interestingly enough, was released by the United Kingdom's Foreign Office), PM Tsvangirai indicated that there was no real evidence of the so-called abductions.
Why then would his deputy contradict him so openly and so brazenly just a few days later?
Is she saying the Prime Minister was mistaken, mis-quoted, or that he simply does not know what the hell he is talking about?
Whichever it is, it points to a serious public policy discord within the ranks of the second largest party in the inclusive Government.
And then there is this surprising emergent trend among MDC-T officials who are also members of the Executive of threatening the life span of the inclusive Government.
It certainly does look weird when the Deputy Prime Minister conveniently sets aside her State hat and dons her party colours so that she can attack the lack of GPA-related progress of the Government that she is a very senior member of.
But that is not the real issue.
MDC-T, as a duly-registered political party that has supplied a Prime Minister, a Deputy PM and several Ministers to a national Government, certainly has earned the right to have its own internecine strife if it so wishes.
The problem arises when this party decides that it should boycott a Cabinet meeting.
Cabinet is not, strictly speaking, a constitutional body.
It is an administrative structure that the President, as Head of State, constitutes and congregates so as to improve formulation, co-ordination and implementation of Government policy.
That is why it is not a body that can be dissolved.
Rather, the President appoints and swears into office Ministers as per his constitutional mandate.
In essence, to sit in this thing called "Cabinet", is to do so at the good graces of the President.
In many countries across the world there is no such thing as "Cabinet".
Heads of State simply have their own "inner circles" of senior ministers with whom they meet as often as they please.
In other countries, Cabinet meetings are not held in the absence of the Head of State and Government -- even if there is something called a deputy chair of cabinet.
Zimbabwe, though, prefers to keep intact an administrative body called a Cabinet for the good functioning of State business.
President Mugabe, in all honesty, does not by law have to call for a Cabinet meeting.
Even then, these have been held with regularity on Tuesdays for the sake of co-ordination and charting progress.
But that does not mean Cabinet meetings have to be held on Tuesdays only.
There is no law in this country that says our ministers and ex-officio members of Cabinet meet on the third day of the week.
So what then is MDC's problem with having a Cabinet meeting on Monday?
Ms Khupe explained their position thus: "This (Monday) morning, we were advised that Cabinet had been shifted from its mandated day of Tuesday to Monday at 10 am.
"Innocent and innocuous as this decision may be, the fact of the matter is that it underpins everything wrong about the present arrangement.
"The decision seeks to deny the recognition of the Prime Minister as chair of Cabinet when the President is away. Mr Mugabe has indicated that he will not be present on Tuesday (today) and hence the unilateral decision to move Cabinet forward to today."
She went on to call yesterday's Cabinet meeting "informal and unilateral".
While her argument might appear sound, it actually reflects a tendency to place a single party in the inclusive Government in superior stead to the business of the State.
What Ms Khupe is telling us is that MDC-T will take the unilateral decision not to attend Cabinet whenever they feel that the meeting has been called on a day that is not Tuesday because that is "unilateral".
She is saying her party is of the opinion that important State business must come to a complete halt because President Mugabe would like to meet his Vice Presidents, Prime Minister, their Deputies and portfolio heads on a Monday.
President Mugabe is attending the African Union Summit in Libya this week and he obviously felt that he would like to meet his appointees before he left for that very weighty coming together of his fellow Heads of State and Government.
Is Ms Khupe telling the nation that President Mugabe has no right -- without even speaking about the constitutional authority -- to call for a meeting of his Government functionaries whenever he feels he should?
And the suggestion that Ms Khupe makes to the effect that President Mugabe is trying to emasculate the deputy chair of Cabinet, PM Tsvangirai, is a mischievous political yarn.
PM Tsvangirai chairs a body called the Council of Ministers.
This is a body that, to the best of this writer's understanding, was created through the GPA as per the request of MDC-T negotiators to the party talks so that the Prime Minister would also have opportunity to interface directly with Cabinet ministers.
Hence, even if no Cabinet meeting is held on the Tuesday that the Honourable Ms Khupe evidently considers so holy as to be the Sabbath of the Executive, PM Tsvangirai can meet with Cabinet ministers under the aegis of the Council of Ministers that he chairs.
So yesterday, President Mugabe effectively met with just over half of his Government before he flies out on official business.
This means only half the Government knows what the agenda for the coming week is because nearly another half felt that President Mugabe's Cabinet meeting should not have been held on a Monday.
This writer started this piece by saying that Zimbabwe is in big trouble.
It will be repeated here: we are in serious trouble.
If the second largest party in the inclusive Government feels that State business can only be coordinated on Tuesday's then only heaven knows where we are going.
And this is not "vitriol and propaganda"!

Comments 1 to 5 of 6 Post a comment
We are really in "serous trouble" with this 'boycott party'. The puppet and stooge party has failed to move away from the culture of boycotting anything they do not agree with. They have failed completely to grow up and to see the importance of divorcing themselves from this unAfrican and uncultured culture of boycotting anything and everything.
Why not sit down and talk about any disputed issues? The answer lies in what Cde Sasa called "public posturing". MDC hopes to gain political mileage from a non-issue by blowing trivialities out of proportion. The other reason is that MDC is trying vigorously to divert attention from serious division simmering in the party.
Not so long ago one senior member of the puppet party was talking, on BBC Radio, about threats to MDC officials but Tsvangirai publicly contradicted her by saying if there is anyone who should be threatened it is me, I am not threatened and have NEVER received threatening messages.
Tsvangirai again told interviewers while on his tour of Europe and America that there is nothing like "farm invasions" in Zimbabwe and yet some hardliners in the stooge party want it to appear as if what never happened since the time of farm demonstrations is happening today so as to keep pressure on Zanu-pf.
As if that was not enough Tsvangirai, once again, shot down the notion that there were and are still imagined abductions and yet no one has EVER been abducted in Zimbabwe.
All these issues and contradictions are an indication that there are serious divisions and disagreements in the stooge party and if Tsvangirai is not careful he may be ousted very soon. Most of these unbecoming, silly and stupid announcements are made whilst Tsvangirai is out of the country, why? Answer yourself Mr Boycott - you started it, you should finish it.
After all, as Cde Sasa rightly put it, what is Cabinet and who has the right to convening same?
It is true that there is nothing like Cabinet in some countries. But it is true for all countries that there is no other person who convenes Cabinet except the Head of Cabinet and in our case it is His Excellency President R.G. Mugabe who is the Head of State and Govt of the Republic of Zimbabwe.
If, therefore, MDC-T feels they needed to be consulted on an issue that is this simple and straight forward then let them boycott Cabinet completely so that we move forward from there.
Tsvangirai, whom they want to chair Cabinet in the absence of the Head of Government, cannot call for same because he will NEVER be Acting Head of Govt. It is clear in the GPA that Tsvangirai chairs what has come to be known as 'The Council of Ministers' which he can convene any day he wants but not Cabinet.
If Tsvangirai "understands", as he put it, and supports the action by ministers from his party, how does he feel if Zanu-pf ministers start boycotting the Council of Ministers meetings he is going to call for? What will become of Zimbabwe if MDC-M ministers also decide to boycott both Cabinet and the Council of Ministers meetings as they have no chance, under the sun, of chairing both?
The end result will be Njake-njake (chaos and confusion). There can only be one leader at a time and at this moment in time it is President Mugabe. He is the Head of State and Government and has the absolute right to move forward and backwards Cabinet meetings to a day that is convenient to him and the country and not a few hardliners in a stooge party - it is at the President's grace that Cabinet sits.
How can we behave like goats - baba ndebvu mai ndebvu - zvakamboitwa kupi izvozvo? Chirugu hachiite machongwe maviri ano kukuridza nguva imwe chete!!
Cde Ndebvu - before you quote from the GPA, you had best read it first. Here for your edification:
"20.1.4 The Prime Minister (a) chairs the Council of Ministers and is the Deputy Chairperson of Cabinet;.."
Clearly Tsvangirai is perfectly entitled to chair the cabinet when Mugabe is not present.
Cat;
So what is it that I do not know which prompted you to quote from the GPA? I know better than you mufana!! I am perfectly aware of all that but the issue is not being Deputy Chair of Cabinet but convening Cabinet.
Tsvangi cannot and has no powers to convene Cabinet when the President is away. What he can do and the only time he can take the chair is, during Cabinet session, if the President has to attend to urgent business while Cabinet is in session, poor Tsvangi can chair the meeting.
Tripe!
Whats all this posituring by the MDC-T? I have always maintained that if things are that bad for these guys, the MDC should pull out of the government now and right now. Pull out....if you have any guts. His Excellence, our President, the President of the sovereign nation of Great Zimbabwe, the Hon Robert Gabriel Mugabe, knows that the MDC has no nyanga ... bvunza nhengure.
See All Comments