2 July 2009
THE Speaker of Parliament Lovemore Moyo and his staff are locked in a cold war with MPs in the parliamentary select committee over the constitutional reform process, further jeopardising the exercise.
The fight between parliament administration and the MPs' committee has exposed the cracks within the constitution-making process which has been widely condemned by civic groups. Critics of the process controlled by the three political parties in parliament say it is not inclusive, participatory and democratic.
Information obtained this week shows there is a major rift and tensions are rising between parliament staff and MPs.
The fight is over the control of the constitution-making process, including the planning of the stakeholders' conference slated for July 9-12, invitation and accommodation of delegates, tender for the conference organiser and the guest speaker at the stakeholders' conference. Parliament wants Moyo to be the guest speaker while MPs are pushing to invite prominent South African politician and business magnate Cyril Ramaphosa.
Parliament's staff, who include presiding officers and the management committee, budget committee and the Standing Rules and Orders committee (SROC), and the all stakeholders' conference subcommittee held a tense meeting on Monday to discuss contentious issues.
Another meeting was held on Wednesday at which the select committee of MPs clashed with parliament staff and rejected their proposals, creating an explosive conflict.
At the Monday meeting, the all stakeholders' conference subcommittee was asked by presiding officers of parliament to present its report on the progress it has made in preparing for the conference.
In its report the conference subcommittee said it had scheduled the event for July 9-12. It also said a tender advert for the conference organiser had been prepared and presented to the MPs' select committee which approved it with minor amendments. What was left, it said, was funding to flight the advert.
The subcommittee said accommodation for delegates was being identified with some hotels having confirmed the numbers of rooms they are offering, while others had just made promises.
The subcommittee further reported the MPs' select committee needed a secretariat for the conference, thematic committees, facilitator and a woman chairperson of the event.
After that there was a fierce debate. The presiding officers said MPs could not decide dates of the conference alone. They said the SROC must be consulted. The officers also said the number of delegates could not be left to the MPs' committee alone because it had budgetary implications.
The presiding officers said the steering committee of parliament must give guidance and "a political decision must be made because there are budgetary implications of the number of delegates invited".
The officers also said there were delays in placing an advert for engaging a conference organiser due to budget constraints. They said hiring an outsider as was the case with the media consultant required a downpayment.
Apart from this, there were clashes on the consultation process, the outreach programme and the number of days for the conference. The presiding officers said the conference, to be held at the Harare International Conference Centre, should be one and half days, not three as had been suggested by the MPs. Delegates should be 1 500, not 5 000 and the gender ratio should be 50:50.
The issue of 70 consultative teams and thematic committees of about 40 people per committee should be brought to parliament staff since it had budgetary implications. The conference facilitator and chairperson should also be left to SROC to decide. A joint caucus of all parties in the process should be held to whip MPs into line.
The administration of parliament must organise accommodation, registration and accreditation for delegates, instead of the event organiser. Allocation of delegates for parties must be based on their representation in parliament.
However, presiding officers' proposals were rejected by MPs, leaving the stage set for a major showdown.
Read comments. Write your own.
Copyright © 2009 Zimbabwe Independent. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com). To contact the copyright holder directly for corrections — or for permission to republish or make other authorized use of this material, click here.
AllAfrica aggregates and indexes content from over 125 African news organizations, plus more than 200 other sources, who are responsible for their own reporting and views. Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica.
Chaos again rocked a buffet line, this time at the Ministry of Promises and Assurances. Rumors of additional Asian freshwater turtles being subsituted for prime beef brought hundreds of workers at the ministry lining up for their share of the lunch fare. A busload of Ministry of Barbecue workers crashing the lunch line gave away the secret that something special was being offered. An unnamed taste tester from the Ministry of Menu Subsitutions said that the suspect roast was far superior to any of the offerings that he has tested at local eateries in the last 3 months. It is yet to be seen if these new taste treats will be included in the next national herd census.
Carlos4,
What are you porttraying in your gimmicks? Why don't you give us a break if you cannot contribute anything? Your presentation is out of tune and why waste your time? Surely colleagues will agree with me that this is not your forum.
Carlos you take the nom de guerre of a killer, assasin, thief and a political pervert. That fits the bill. 2000 draft was rejected on the instigation of the white farmers because they didnt like the clause about the land that was there. Now the party that mobilized the the masses to reject is is saying at had its finer points. They where as blind as Ramirez here and many others who cant see what is involved in the making of a constitution. They are as blind as a day old rivulet and as dump as MDC who go and sign the GNU effectively endorsing the Kariba draft only to reject it later on. Mr Boycott and his babies are showing what they are really. Spineless. You cant run a country like a tuckshop. You cant run a country like a family show. I hope the Madhukus and their donor funds lovers are left out. The country needs to move forward.
The GNU says nothing about endorsing the Kariba draft...
Dont be a fool and believe the propoganda the Herald spits out.
Moyo, I beg to differ. I enjoy Carlos4's witty style of expressing his views.
...The minister of Artic Relations was quite upset when he discovered that they BBQ'd the Ambassador Penguin. The Ministry of Bicycles used the occasion to announce that due to a shortage gov't issued bicycles could only be ridden on with one tire. Several thousand ministers at the BBQ were enraged since the Ministry of Mercedes-Benz only alloted free cars to the top 1,000 ministries. The Minister of 'What the Heck' was heard to say "what the heck?"
Noble1, The minister of I am Not the one/It wasn't me/ I know nothing, said it all.
....dizvo.....
My musings do not nearly approach the fantasy that some post on this site. For any one to believe that uncle bob is anything less than a poster child for the typical African despot is truly unbelievable. To expound on the great land grab as a plus for the Zimbabwe people brings laughter to her neighbors and starvation to her subjects. To ignore the beatings, arson and torture and yet hail the Zanuobos as heroes is the true fantasy; to blame travel sanctions on these goons as being responsible for the disasters demonstrates total ignorance of the facts. I say remove travel restrictions and clamp them in irons for their crimes when they dare leave their lairs. If you cannot see the irony in my posts, dont read them.