The Nation (Nairobi)

Botswana: Court Reaffirms President's Immunity

Gaborone — Botswana's highest court has dealt a blow to the onslaught against President Ian Khama by his opponents in the ruling party by declaring that he enjoys blanket immunity for legal proceedings.

A five-man bench of a special session of the Court of Appeal unanimously ruled on Friday that the High Court was right last month in rejecting an application by Botswana Democratic Party (BDP) secretary general, Mr Gomolemo Motswaledi, seeking to reverse the suspension slapped on him by President Khama in August.

The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court decision that Section 41 of the Botswana constitution grants a sitting president blanket immunity from court proceedings.

The argument

The Court of Appeal judges rejected the argument by South Africa's Senior Counsel, Mr Roland Sutherland, for Mr Motswaledi, that the section needed to be interpreted widely to create a third category in which a president can act besides the 'official or private' capacities.

The Court of Appeal said that the meaning of Section 41 is that when the president acts in a capacity other than as head of state, his act is to be categorised as an act in his private capacity. But the Court of Appeal judges said they were not at liberty to create an intermediate category nor to rewrite the Botswana constitution.


Copyright © 2009 The Nation. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com). To contact the copyright holder directly for corrections — or for permission to republish or make other authorized use of this material, click here.

AllAfrica aggregates and indexes content from over 130 African news organizations, plus more than 200 other sources, who are responsible for their own reporting and views. Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica.

Comments 1 to 1 of 1 Post a comment

  • Rosie Deus-von Homeyer/www.facebook.com
    Oct 5 2009, 19:25

    THE COURT OF APPEALS DID NOT DECIDE ON MATERIAL LAW...

    IT DECIDED ON THE PREREQUISITS FOR MOTION...ONE OF WHICH IS

    A PROPER PARTY TO A SUIT.

    These are THE FIRST STEPS IN INTIATING A COURT hearing.

    Therefore Khama ought NOT to think,IT WAS CORRECT TO FIRE

    MOTSWALEDI!

    Even if Motswaledi was shouting,he was CORRECT...

    THE LAW FIRM OF COLLINSNEWMAN&CO HAD HAD TO BE KEPT OUT OF

    the PERFORMANCE EVALUATION!

    Therefore Khama should reinstae Motswaledi if he does NOT want to instill

    more animosity in his party.