Copenhagen — "It's clear now - we're not getting a binding deal at the end of tomorrow," said the president of Friends of the Earth-United States, Erich Pica.
Industrialised nations are burying their heads in the sand and poor countries seem set to be forced to continue bearing the burden of global warming. The demonstrations, flyers, news media and all kinds of pressure to get the Western countries to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions and compensate poor countries with financial resources and technology seem to have fallen on deaf ears.
Inside the Bella Center, the venue for the Dec. 7-18 15th Conference of Parties (COP15) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in Copenhagen, leaders from different parts of the world delivered more or less the same message about the impacts of climate change and why it is important to help poor countries.
The United States stimulated a lot of media interest when Secretary of State Hillary Clinton put her government's cards on the table. But her proposal of 100 billion dollars a year of funding from 2020 confirmed the arrogance of the developed world: the South is looking for an immediate commitment to roughly 200 billion dollars a year for mitigation, adaptation and technology transfers.
Relevant Links
The U.S. plan would take a decade to make half of what developing countries estimate is needed available. Clinton rubbed it in by making even this limited offer conditional on countries such as China and Russia committing to transparent actions on cutting emissions.
"The developed countries are now trying to push the blame to developing countries so that when a deal fails to come up tomorrow, they'll blame it on China or Russia for refusal to cooperate," said Pica.
Other observers also noted that the U.S. proposal was silent on practical questions such as where the money will come from, how the fund will grow over the years, and very unclear on when it would end.
Several heads of state, whether by design or default, seem to be shying away from this meeting. Indian Prime Minister Mohamed Singh, who was supposed to fly from India to Copenhagen this afternoon, was reportedly delayed because of a technical problem with his aircraft.
This delay means that a consensus between the four largest developing economies - China, India, Brazil and South Africa - whose leaders were supposed to meet tonight, will take longer to emerge.
U.S. President Barack Obama also did not pitch today, postponing a much-anticipated address to the Conference.
A leaked internal document from the U.N. Secretariat spells out how much remains to be done: assessing the emissions reduction pledges from industrialised nations who are part of the Kyoto protocol and the voluntary offers from everyone else, the expected rise in temperature will be roughly three degrees.
The last day of negotiations now dawns with everything left to accomplish: a yawning gap remains between major blocs of countries, between the negotiations in the Bella Centre and the demands of civil society, and - still - between what the markets can conceive and what scientists say is the minimum needed to protect the diversity of life on this planet.
Claudia Ciobanu, Servaas van den Bosch and Terna Gyuse contributed to this report. This story appears in the IPS TerraViva online daily published for the U.N. Conference on Climate Change in Copenhagen.

Comments 1 to 2 of 2 Post a comment
The less developed world has a great deal of power and responsibility in climate issues. Stop selling oil. It all gets made into GHG. While you will sell it, the political systems of the overdeveloped world have no way to stop their economies from buying it. The money that you get from export has always done you more harm than good anyway. There is little reason to believe that the money you would get from a climate deal would benefit you any more.
Like Africa's other needs, Your needs for climate change control and adaptation are best solved using African resources and labor. Clear your waters of weeds and silt. Use the silt for erosion control and soil rehabilitation. Make the weed biomass into biofuel. Cleared waterways will restore the cooling system, and reverse desertification. Cleared drainage will reduce flooding. Harvest the rainwater you get with intermittent overabundance. That includes rain barrels, making little local catchments, and clearing the reservoirs you have.
Africa can be totally self sufficient in food and energy, and all its other real needs including financial. The labor needed to do these things is looking for work. Employ yourselves doing what you need done.
I don't understand, Africa has been given billions and billions of dollars in aid for other projects that have been looted by the elites. What makes anyone think that African leaders won't plunder any aid funds recieved for Climate Change?
Science, just look at Africa's approach to AIDS.
In fact, does Gabon have a Ministry of Science, how about Guinea or DRC? How many African meterologists are there?
All of a sudden, now we are meant to believe that African leaders are champions of Science?