This Day (Lagos)

Nigeria: U.S. Blacklists Country

Lagos — Henceforth, Nigerians will start experiencing what they probably fear the most on the international arena: blacklisting. The country has been added to the infamous list of "countries of interest" and its citizens travelling to the United States would be thoroughly scrutinised, no thanks to Umaru Farouk AbdulMutallab, the would-be bomber who attempted to blow up a transatlantic jetliner on December 25, 2009. But the Minister of Information, Professor Dora Akunyili, has described the move as discriminatory against 150 million Nigerians.

THISDAY learnt last night that the National Security Adviser, Gen. Sarki Muktar, has summoned an emergency security meeting for today to discuss the latest development.

Expected to attend the meeting are the heads of the security agencies, including the Nigeria Intelligence Agency (NIA), State Security Service (SSS) and the Inspector General of Police. The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) reported that the US had stepped up measures to stop potential suicide bombers in their tracks. These measures include categorising countries into two - "states sponsors of terrorism" and "countries of interest" followed with enhanced screening. Starting from yesterday, air travellers flying into the US from Saudi Arabia, Nigeria, Yemen and other "countries of interest" would be subjected to enhanced screening techniques, such as body scans, pat-downs and a thorough search of carry-on luggage. The US State Department lists Cuba, Iran, Sudan, North Korea and Syria as state sponsors of terrorism.

The other "countries of interest" whose passengers will face enhanced screening are Afgha-nistan, Algeria, Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, Pakistan and Somalia. Additionally, all passengers on US-bound international flights will be subjected to random screening, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) announced. Airports were also directed to increase "threat-based" screening of passengers who may be acting in a suspicious manner. Akunyili is defending Nigeria vigorously saying AbdulMutallab's case is a "one off thing". According to her, the 23-year-old suspect does not represent what Nigeria stands for. "He (AbdulMutallab) was not influenced in Nigeria and he was not recruited or trained in Nigeria.

He was not supported whatsoever in Nigeria and his behaviour is not reflective of Nigerians and should therefore not be used as a yardstick to judge all Nigerians," declared the minister. "Nigerians are peace-loving and happy people. We were even voted as the happiest people on earth," Akunyili stated further. The minister said AbdulMutallab was a well-behaved child from a responsible family who developed an ugly tendency because of his exposure outside the shores of Nigeria. In her reaction, the Chairman House of Representatives Committee on the Diaspora, Hon Abike Dabiri-Erewa, said the US should not have grouped Nigeria with countries where terrorists already have cells. She added that uprisings or killings which Nigerian security agencies had been battling to curtail started even before Al-Qaeda came into existence.

"In fact, we do not in anyway deserve this categorization and I think this is part of failure of leadership because since this happened, we do not have a president speaking with the US President Barack Obama and this is one of the consequences of President Umaru Musa Yar'Adua not handing over properly before he travelled for treatment abroad," she stated. The new security measures came in response to the failed Christmas Day attempt by AbdulMutallab to bomb a Northwest/Delta jetliner as it approached Detroit from Amsterdam. AbdulMutallab is the son of wealthy retired banker, Umaru Mutallab. Reports say his father and mother Aisha will travel to the US for his trial which starts on January 8.


Copyright © 2010 This Day. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com). To contact the copyright holder directly for corrections — or for permission to republish or make other authorized use of this material, click here.

AllAfrica aggregates and indexes content from over 130 African news organizations, plus more than 200 other sources, who are responsible for their own reporting and views. Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica.

Comments 1 to 2 of 2 Post a comment

  • hopewaddell
    Jan 5 2010, 17:59

    Don`t travel to the US then, and place restrictions on Americans travelling to Nigeria as well! Its time we woke up from this slumber and fixed our problems at home. Not that long ago, American universities were begging my older brother to come to the States,to study. Today, it is completely different. Why? Economics. When their money was worth little, we meant a lot. Now that the roles are reveresed, they treat us like lepers. We(Nigeria) have more in natural and human resources, than a combination of some of these self claiming "rich nations".If you have any sense and you live out here, pay close attention to the lifestyle for confirmation. Attempts by Simon Mann and Colin Thatcher to forcefully seize the govt of Eq Guinea,so that they could steal crude oil and other resources, did not prompt us to place unnecessary restrictions on British nationals, on their travel to Africa. The US has supported, at one point or another,every nation involved in terrorism and the oppression of its populace, or that of others. Israel is a case in point. I just hope that this serves as a wake up call for Nigeria, to take the bulls by the horn, and shape up, to prevent Nigerians from going abroad to suffer, when they can be comfortable at home in Nigeria.

  • chokora
    Jan 8 2010, 02:07

    " .. (FEC) has described as highhanded and unfair, decision by the United States government to list the country among those to be watched over terror.."

    "highhanded"? "unfair"?

    Do other countries from whence terrorists - or those who commit acts of terror - emerge receive preferential treatment from the USA government? Who else, in all fairness, should be on - or top - that list?

    Case in Point: Sept 11, 2001 Terror attacks in USA Most of the terrorists of the Sept 11, 2001 attacks in USA were Saudi Arabians. Yet Saudi Arabia and its citizens were not singled out by USA for the special treatment now directed at Nigeria and Nigerians.

    -

    Case in Point: 2001- Shoe-bomber terror attacks An American terrorist attempts to destroy a commercial aircraft in-flight by detonating explosives hidden in his shoes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Reid_(shoe_bomber)

    -

    Case in Point: 2001-2002 - Anthrax terror attacks

    A suspected American bio-terrorist killed 5 people, harmed 68.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001_anthrax_attacks

    -

    Case in Point: 2002 - Terror attacks at the El Al ticket counter in Los Angeles

    American resident opened fire at the airport, killing 2, wounding 4.

    http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/West/04/12/airport.shooting/

    -

    Case in Point: 2002 - DC sniper terror attacks

    American terrorists killed 10, injured 3.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beltway_sniper_attacks

    -

    Case in Point: 2006 - SUV terrorist attack. American terrorist (who worships the terrorists in the Sept 11, 2001 attacks) drives an SUV through a group of pedestrians - 9 injured.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammed_Reza_Taheri-azar_SUV_attack

    --

    Are you still there? Is the anger of the Nigerians justified?

    The west needs Nigeria more that Nigerians needs the west. Why are Nigerians whimpering instead of standing up to these foreigners? As if the Nigerians have no options! Do Nigerians really appreciate the extent and potency of their leverage on the west?

    One reason not to be cowardly: Crude oil to the west from Nigeria - over US$150,000,000 A DAY.

    Do you need more reasons?

    Cue: When Belgians threatened to indict Blair, Bush, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz as war criminals - for crimes against humanity in Iraq - the USA did not whimper: It issued credible threats of dire consequences (economic sanctions) and the righteous Belgians immediately cowered in submission..

    http://rtsf.wordpress.com/2009/04/03/indict-bush-blair-et-al-for-crimes-aga inst-humanity/