Center for Global Development (Washington, DC)

Nigeria: After the Plane Bomber, Where in the World is the President?

guest blog

Amid all the media frenzy around the Nigerian underwear bomber and how America should have stopped him before he tried to blow up a passenger plane on Christmas Day, a critical piece to the counter-terrorism puzzle seems to have been missed: where in the world is the Nigerian President?

Normally, after such a horrific incident, President Obama would be on the phone with his counterpart, discussing what went wrong and agreeing on ways to work better in the future to prevent such attacks.  But this couldn't happen because Nigeria's President Umaru Yar'Adua left his country for medical treatment in Saudi Arabia on November 23rd and hasn't been seen or heard from since.

Yes, you read that right:  the whereabouts of the leader of Nigeria—America's most important strategic ally in Africa, the fifth largest source of U.S. oil imports, and home to 150 million people—are unknown. It is also not clear if he is alive or dead.

The situation is so uncertain that Nigeria's parliament is openly considering sending a delegation to Saudi Arabia to find out the truth. A major opposition party yesterday demanded, quite reasonably, some "proof of life".

The mystery over Yar'Adua is so bizarre as to be comical — if the consequences weren't so severe. His absence has thrust the country into an immediate constitutional crisis. The President failed to delegate authority to his deputy before travelling, effectively leaving no one in charge. This 43-days-and-counting power vacuum is being swiftly filled by an insular cabal bent on exploiting the situation for their own gain.

Complicating matters, the vice president— ironically named Goodluck Jonathan — is a Christian and an Ijaw, part of a minority group from the southern Niger Delta region and far from the power centers of the northern Muslim elites who expect one of their own to run the country. There is much speculation that insiders are scheming now of ways to keep Jonathan from ever assuming power. In an ominous sign, a new chief justice was quickly (and possibly illegally) sworn in last week.

These developments all put Nigeria's future at great risk. A decade of constitutional democracy is threatened by the specter of mass violence and a possible military coup.

The failed terrorist attack by Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab on Northwest Flight 253 highlights that Nigeria's power void is dangerous for the U.S. as well. The foundation of a counter-terrorism strategy is to build cooperative partnerships with friendly nations. This means sharing information and helping to build security capacity in places like Yemen, Afghanistan, and Nigeria.

But we cannot have a partnership if there is no one on the other end of the line. Nigeria cannot be a reliable ally if it is consumed by its own corruption and political machinations. In this way, Nigeria is rapidly becoming more like Somalia— a failed state with no real government to cooperate with— than a real partner.

What can the United States do? First, it should insist on an immediate public declaration of President Yar'Adua's health and fitness to govern. If the President's staff refuse to oblige, then the U.S. should encourage the national assembly to assert its constitutional responsibilities when it reconvenes on January 12.

Second, if, as seems likely, Yar'Adua is in fact incapacitated, the U.S. must demand that the constitution be followed and power transferred to the vice president. The long-term security of Nigeria depends on entrenching the rule of law and this must supersede any palace intrigue or political bargaining.

Third, it is clear that whatever the outcome over the next few weeks, Nigeria will remain on a knife's edge until elections in 2011.  Any hope for a more stable country hinges on a credible election next year. Yar'Adua came to power in a deeply flawed poll in April 2007 and almost no steps have since been taken to fix the broken system. The U.S. is in a unique position to push for and help deliver a better election that would strengthen the authority and legitimacy of the next government.

Last, the U.S. can support Nigeria's vibrant civil society that is clearly fed up and is increasingly demanding change.

The case of the missing Nigerian President is a wake up call to the United States about the vulnerability of many of our global partners. How we respond is not only crucial to the future of an important ally, but a critical test of our strategy for building partnerships in troubled places to combat the global ills of our time.

Todd Moss is vice president and senior fellow at the Center for Global Development in Washington DC. He served as Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs during the Bush administration.


Copyright © 2010 Center for Global Development. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com). To contact the copyright holder directly for corrections — or for permission to republish or make other authorized use of this material, click here.

AllAfrica aggregates and indexes content from over 130 African news organizations, plus more than 200 other sources, who are responsible for their own reporting and views. Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica.

Comments 1 to 5 of 13 Post a comment

  • KaparaK
    Jan 5 2010, 15:01

    Instead of asking direct questions about specific individuals like our MIA Emperor Yar that this writer posed, the current administration prefers generalizing, painting all Nigerians with the same tar & feathering us with condescending speeches like the one made in Ghana while appealing for Muslims’ support in Egypt (as they have now redoubled their aid to Yemen, as if money can buy love). Ironically, I long, nostalgically, for the backbone days of President Bush & PM Blair for courting the likes of President Obasanjo in their collaborative effort to combat terrorism. This is war and should be confronted as such, not on bended knees.

  • fuming
    Jan 5 2010, 16:25

    I think we have a right to know if hes dead or alive.why should they keep us in the dark?are we idiots they re ruling or they couldnt possible care what we think afterall thats the way theyve been ruling us in this country.the same nonchalant attitude but this time it will backfire on them because they will run out of lies and excuses.After a shameful incident that has thrust us Nigerians further into the spotlight as dishonest,fraudulent,and now terrorist and yet they cannot tell the truth about the condition of our president who was expected to make a public statement to the world about the latest shameful incident involving a nigerian.I think its about time the truth be told.

  • kia
    Jan 5 2010, 17:37

    Nigerian's it's time to wakeup. With all the phd's doctorate in this and that and you let these bounch of fools run the country like a failed coner store in LA. May be it's time again for military rule because this democracy thing is not working.

  • ocj
    Jan 5 2010, 23:01

    I think the post written by Fuming is spot on.

    It should not be for a representative from a foreign power who should be asking these questions, but Nigerians.

    It appears as if everyone there is still in a slumber in the mistaken belief that inaction will sort out this and the many other problems that bedevil the country. Alas, they will be proved wrong time and time again...

  • Rugged
    Jan 6 2010, 01:13

    I feel sick to my stomach about what's happening to this nation of ours. I feel the wave of chaos rolling in but will the corrupt, elitist, ruling mob act? Do we really want violence in Nigeria? When will we learn from other people's mistakes?(Somalia, Sudan, etc). The citizenry should be encouraged to speak out about our leaderless nation and the numerous ills we face because its looking really hopeless. Our representatives in the national assembly should be asking these questions indeed; where is the Nigerian President? Whose head rests the crown now? What is the constitutionally approved time frame for absence due to ill-health allowed for the President before being voted out of office? Do we have that factored into the constitution? One day we will all wake up to find that the money we've always relied on to bribe our way out of a wake-up revolution has dried up or is rejected and then... Nirvana at last!!!

See All Comments