PlusNews (Johannesburg)

Malawi: Government Finally Moves On Male Circumcision

Lilongwe — Clement Zulu never thought he would be circumcised. A Christian from the north of Malawi, Zulu was among millions of Malawians who believed the practice was a ritual for the southern Yao people, who are mostly Muslims.

But after reading a newspaper article in October 2011 stating that Malawi had adopted medical male circumcision as part of its HIV prevention strategy and would begin providing the service, the 34-year-old had a change of heart. Zulu is now one of the many to have undergone the procedure free at state hospitals.

"Having lost my three relatives to I decided to take some precautionary measures that would [help to] prevent me from being infected," he told News.

According to the Principal Secretary for in the Office of the President and Cabinet, Mary Shawa, more than 5,000 men have so far been circumcised - an "encouraging" figure given that only 4 percent of the country's medical staff have been trained to carry out the surgical procedure.

"Being a [member of the] medical [profession] does not mean that one automatically knows how to [perform] circumcisions. So there are special courses that [have to be] taken regarding the circumcision," she told News.

The campaign hopes to circumcise more than 250,000 men by 2015, said National Sexually Transmitted Infections Programme Officer in the Ministry of Health, Amon Nkhata.

As one of the countries hardest hit by HIV, Malawi has been criticized for moving too slowly in introducing free male circumcision in state facilities. Results from three randomized clinical trials released in 2005 and 2006 provided compelling evidence that circumcision can reduce a man's risk of HIV infection during heterosexual intercourse by as much as 60 percent.

The World Health Organization endorsed the procedure as an HIV-prevention measure in 2007, but implementation of a large-scale male circumcision programme in Malawi has been controversial in the conservative country.

Southern Malawi, where most circumcisions take place, has a large migrant labour population and an HIV prevalence rate of about 18 percent, accounting for almost 70 percent of the country's HIV infections, according to government figures. Circumcision is culturally less prominent in northern Malawi, where prevalence rates are also lower.

The disparity between HIV prevalence and traditional circumcision rates has raised doubts among some health officials, who argued in local newspapers that they had not yet been presented with enough clinical evidence, and the efficacy of male circumcision was questionable given high HIV prevalence rates among traditionally circumcising populations in the south.

But the government formally launched its voluntary medical male circumcision programme last year in Mulanje district, which has an estimated HIV prevalence of 17 percent. Mulanje is one of nine pilot districts to offer the service.

"Malawi had also conducted its own study which also proved the efficacy of male circumcision in reducing the spread of the virus that causes AIDS," said Ministry of Health spokesman Henry Chimbali.

The government has embarked on an intense campaign to disseminate accurate information about medical male circumcision. Malawi registers 70,000 new infections a year, and people still had to be reminded that male circumcision alone is "not 100 percent safe", Chimbali cautioned.

[ This report does not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations ]

  • Comment (7)

Copyright © 2012 PlusNews. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com). To contact the copyright holder directly for corrections — or for permission to republish or make other authorized use of this material, click here.

AllAfrica aggregates and indexes content from over 130 African news organizations, plus more than 200 other sources, who are responsible for their own reporting and views. Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica.

Comments Post a comment

  • Craig Garrett
    Feb 10 2012, 21:15

    Circumcision to prevent HIV/AIDS does not make sense. Circumcised men still have to use a condom just like intact (uncircumcised) men. The best way to prevent HIV is through education about safe sex, not surgery. Don't let them fool you into getting circumcised - you'll still have to wear a condom every time.

    And for women: don't let a circumcised man have sex with you without a condom. Don't let him fool you into thinking he's immune from HIV.

  • Human Rights Abuse
    Feb 10 2012, 23:29

    See: Boyle GJ, Hill G. Sub-Saharan African randomised clinical trials into male circumcision and HIV transmission: Methodological, ethical and legal concerns. J Law Med 2011;19:316-34.

    The (Australian) Journal of Law and Medicine, has published a new critique of those three randomized clinical trials from Africa that claimed that male circumcision reduces female-to-male sexual transmission of HIV by 60 percent.

    This critique finds numerous flaws in the execution of these studies and finds that the actual reduction in HIV transmission is about 1.3 percent, not the claimed 60 percent. The 1.3 percent is not considered to be clinically significant.

    This is balanced by a 61 percent relative increase in male to female HIV transmission when the male partner is circumcised.

    Given this, the three RCTs should not be used in the formulation of public health policy. See attached pdf:

    http://www.salem-news.com/articles/december112011/circumcision-hiv-rg.php

  • Human Rights Abuse
    Feb 10 2012, 23:50

    See: Boyle GJ, Hill G. Sub-Saharan African randomised clinical trials into male circumcision and HIV transmission: Methodological, ethical and legal concerns. J Law Med 2011;19:316-34. The Journal of Law and Medicine, has published a new critique of those three randomized clinical trials from Africa that claimed that male circumcision reduces female-to-male sexual transmission of HIV by 60 percent. This critique finds numerous flaws in the execution of these studies and finds that the actual reduction in HIV transmission is about 1.3 percent, not the claimed 60 percent. The 1.3 percent is not considered to be clinically significant. This is balanced by a 61 percent relative increase in male to female HIV transmission when the male partner is circumcised.

    Given this, the three RCTs should not be used in the formulation of public health policy.

    See attached pdf: http://www.salem-news.com/articles/december112011/circumcision-hiv-rg.php

  • TLC Tugger
    Feb 11 2012, 01:20

    In Malawi today, it is the circumcised who have markedly higher HIV incidence.

    This VMMC is insanity.

  • kjrs120
    Feb 11 2012, 02:15

    By the time these idiots have commenced circumcising their second batch in 2015, most of the first batch of their targeted 250,000 men will have succumbed to HIV/AIDS because of the irresponsible notion that circumcision makes one immune to the disease. Is it any wonder some of these fools believe that raping baby girls cures AIDS.

See All Comments