The ongoing political crisis in Mali presents a dilemma for ECOWAS as it strives to restore calm and bring back the ousted regime. ECOWAS is caught between minimizing civilian casualty, maintaining stability and on the other hand restoring the ousted regime of Amadu Toumani Toure. Any success attain any side will be the organization's first most successful attempt at restoring civilian democratic rule and stability as previous efforts in Guinea (2008) and Niger (2010) failed. At the same time the crisis poses a challenge to the legitimacy of ECOWAS as a sub-regional governing body, and this will be seen if the military juntas survive the pressure and hold on to power. This was the legitimacy crisis that faced ECOWAS when it failed in isolating the juntas in Guinea and Niger.
Days before the coup in Mali ECOWAS had a fact-finding mission in Mali during which they called on parties in the crisis - the Government of Mali under ousted President Toure and the National Movement for the Liberation of Azawad (NMLA) - to observe a ceasefire and allow humanitarian missions to reach civilian areas. ECOWAS also declared support for the Government of Mali and asked member states to support the regime with necessary logistics in fighting to regain its territories.
This call was made two days before the coup on March 21. Unfortunately, member states could not support the regime with logistics, and this was evidenced by the rapid advances made by the rebels, and the frustration of soldiers who led the mutiny that resulted in a coup. At the moment the NMLA has overrun government forces and has claimed Northern Mali 'liberated'. The question now is will ECOWAS continue to mobilize its 2000 standby soldiers to support Mali or will it continue to impose sanctions on the current junta leadership?
What ECOWAS has to realize at the moment is that the coup has changed the situation in Mali dramatically, and the self-claimed victory of the NMLA in the North has deepened the fragility of the situation. The need therefore to design a strategy that will stabilize the situation and minimize further civilian casualties and destruction is imperative. Threats of sanctions and isolation will not succeed in this case, but will increasingly make Mali ungovernable thereby giving rise to insurgent activities in other areas including the capital Bamako.
ECOWAS' current action against the junta is supported by its Protocol on Democracy and Good Governance, in which the leaders of the subregion commits themselves to recognizing only governments that are formed through constitutional means, and not through force of arms. Article 1 (b) states: 'Every accession to power must be made through free, fair and transparent elections'; and (c) Zero tolerance for power obtained or maintained by unconstitutional means. By this Protocol ECOWAS members therefore, cannot recognize the current junta leadership as a legitimate governing authority.
But what happens to the people of Mali in this case. In anyway, returning Toure to power cannot easily resolve the political crisis. The government of Toure has been delegitimized and demoralized in the face of the Malian people. At the same time the military cannot be trusted as history has shown. ECOWAS at this point will want to be careful not to worsen the situation. Sanctions on the country will be felt more terribly by the ordinary people of Mali than the ruling military. The need therefore to find a trade-off between enforcing the protocol and the survival of the Malian people is critical at this point.
ECOWAS invocation of its protocol on Governance and Democracy in case of military coups have not also succeeded in fully isolating and compelling juntas to turn over power to civilian rule. Recent cases in Guinea and Niger were clear examples. Even with threats of isolation and sanctions from the sub-regional body, and the African Union, West African leaders worked and allied with both juntas. In the last political crisis in Ivory Coast, efforts by ECOWAS to use military force against defiant Laurent Gbagbo was frustrated by Ghana, seen then as an allied of the Gbagbo regime. The refusal of Ghana to participate in the campaign was a major blow to the organization because Ghana is a major power in the sub-region, and its territories were earmarked as a base for the military operation.
Nonetheless, the situation in Mali is seeing some coherence amongst ECOWAS members, but also pundits believe that the efforts are only aimed at bringing back a deposed 'friend' to power despite the precarious situation and the loss of legitimacy. Malian civilians have proven this by their support for the junta leadership. Opposition politicians have also not called for the return of Toure but continue to demand a turn over power to a civilian transitional arrangement. We believe that Toure's return to power will degenerate the situation into further chaos, since we cannot out rule the possibilities of persecutions, and purges in the military and the political class.
Increased isolation of the juntas while they still hold onto power will also increase the tendency to strongman and dictatorial rule as characteristic of military leaderships. It is important to be reminded of the case of Guinea when outside pressures led the civilians to demonstrations against the military during which over 150 civilians were killed. What can be seen as opportunity for progress at this early stage are the moves for recognition by the military and its submission to the demand for the restoration of the Constitution. The announcement by the junta leader on April 1 2012 that the Constitution has been restored is a sign of progress which ECOWAS can build on. A second opportunity is the planned national transitional dialogue with civil society and political parties which the junta leadership is organizing. ECOWAS can participate and give guidance to this transition process.
ECOWAS' initial plan to boost the military capacity by deploying 2000 troops from the ECOWAS Standby Force needs to be revised considering the dramatic change in leadership and the occupation of the North by the Tuaregs (NMLA). The force can now be deployed with a new objective of separating the two sides in the war. This force will also enforce the ceasefire and maintain stability. Any attempt to engage the Tuaregs militarily will possibly lead to years of war and destruction that will at the end, return to a referendum like the case of South Sudan.
The dialogue initially called for by ECOWAS between the Government of Mali and the NMLA can begin now and without delay. In this case ECOWAS will want to constitute a working committee to engage the Tuaregs, and also such committee can lead negotiations between the Tuaregs and the juntas to establish and enforce a ceasefire until a civilian government is elected after the proposed transition period. The civilian government with ECOWAS and United Nations support can now lay the foundations for discussing the future of Mali with focus on the demand of the Tuaregs. This will include deciding whether the Tuaregs will vote for an independent Azawad or will run an autonomous authority in the Republic of Mali.
Additional dialogues by sub-regional actors are also needed to examine the Tuaregs insurrection on the stability of West Africa, considering the increasing militarization and proliferation of small arms in the sub-region. Here we take note of the increasing instability in Nigeria by militants of Boko Haram, intermittent unrests in the Cassamance region of Senegal, and the alleged mobilization of rebels along the Liberian-Ivorian border.
Lastly, it is important for ECOWAS to strengthen its institutions and begin to promote programs aimed at increasing political and economic integration of the West African sub-region. The need to rationalize policy positions on international issues and a common security strategy for the region cannot be overemphasized. Efforts at rationalizing a common West African position on international issues have been frustrated by countries still under imperial control and led by puppet governments. ECOWAS must therefore include in its protocols sanctions against governments that undermine declared positions of the organization. Unless the members of the organization recognize it as a sub-regional governing authority, ECOWAS will continue to struggle for legitimacy.
-In the Cause of Democracy and Social Justice the Pen Shall Never Run Dry
Comments Post a comment
I COULD NOT AGREE MORE WITH YOUR LAST OBSERVATION. THESE PUPPETS WHO ARE KEEPING THE CONTINENT FROM LIBERATION MUST DESIST FROMTHEIR FOLLIS AND RECOGNISE THAT THIS IS NOT A JOKE. MAN AN MAN HAVE NO TIME TO BE AN INFERIOR TO PEOPLE WHOM ARE NT EVN WORTHY OF SUCH A POSITION. IF THESE PEOPLE WERE TRULY HOUNERABLE THEN YOU COULD RATIONALISE THE THOUGHT BUT THEY ARE CRIMINAL MAINDED THEY ARE THIEVES THEY ARE DISHONEST FRAUDSSTERS ALL THEIR PRACTICES ARE JUST FULL OF SO MUCH ABOMINATION ITS JUST TOO MUCH TO COMPREHEND. AT NO TIME ARE THEY TRUE TO THEIR WORDS THAT IS WHAT OFFENDS ME SO MUCH. THESE PEOPLE ARAE SO LIE THEY ARE BACKSTABBERS WHY WOULD OR SHOULD BLACK PEOPLE HAVE ANY ALLIAGANCES TO THESE PEOPLE. THESE PUPPETS MUST STEP DOWN AND ALLOW FOR AFRICA TO GROW. AS THIS BROTHER SAYS WE WILL NOT STAND FOR ANY BACKWARDS MOVEMENT BY ANY MEMBER STATES. THERE HAS TO BE CONSENCUS AMAONGST ALL OUR BRETHERN IN AFRICA WHER WE STAND. WE SONT TO HEAR ABOUT ANY ARAB MOVEMENT ON THE AFRICAN CONTINENT THIS A DISTRACTIONA S WE SAW IN EYPT. THE PEOPLE WERE REACHING OUT TO A STRONG UNIFED AFRICA WHICH WE ALL WANT THEN THE WEST FRANCE AND THEIR AMERICAM BUDDIES INSISTED THAT THE GULF STATES GET INVOLVED THEY PLAYED THE BACKWARDS CARD ON US STRESSING THEIR BROWN COMPLEXTION AS IF THEY ARE ASHAMED OF THEIR TRUE. RIGHTEOUSS ORIGINAL BLACK BLOOD..WHETHER THEY LIKE IT OR NOT WE WILL NOT LISTEN TO ANY MORE WHITE PROPOGANDA AS TO WHOM WE ARE AND WHERE WE ARE. THEIR FALSE IDEOLOGY HAS BEEN USED TO DEFEAT OTU CONSCIOU MOVEMENTS. THE MOVEMENT HAS BEEN SO STAGNATED THAT BLACK PEOPLE I MEAN BLACK PEOPLE WHO ARE BLACK SKINNED ARE TALKING ABOUT THEY ARE AFRICAN AND THE ARABS THIS IS THE MOST UNADULTERATED FOOLISHNESS I HAVE EVER HEARD IN MY LIFE. BNROTHERS WE ARE ALL BLACK LIGHT BROWN SKIN NEARLY LOOKING WHITE WE ARE ALL BLACK AND AFRICAN. THIS NEES TO SOAK IN THAT BRAIN. YES THERE HAS BEEN DIFFERNT MIXES OF WHITE SKIN WITH THE ORIGINAL BLACK AFRICAN SKIN BUT NOTHINGS CHANGE YOU ARE STILL HERE AND YOU ARE STILL BLACK. YES THERE WAS SOME FO THE PEPK,E WHO FLED BU AGAIN THE PEPLE WERE ASSIMILATED INTO THE LIGHTER SKINNED PEOLE WHO CONQUORED WHAT YOU MUST KNWO IS THAT UYES THEY ARE WHITES IN EGYPT AND INTHE AFRIICAN CONTIENENT HOWEVER ALL AND MOST OF THE CONTINENTS PEOPLE ARE BY RIGHT BLACK I WILL JSUT TAKE A MINUTE T REUTIFY THAT BLACK WAS THE FIRST AND DOMINANT SHADE OF AFRICA THIS THE FIRST PLACE AND ORIGIN OF ALL HUMANITY AND EVERYONE THAT LEFT AFRICA TO BECOEM WHOM THEY ARE WAS WRITTEN IN TEH STORY FO BABEL HOWEVER WHAT IS MISSING IS THAT AFRICS MMOST PREDOMINANT GENE IS THE MELANINB WHICH IS ONLY FOUN IN BLACKS AND PEPLE OF BLACK HISTORYWHEN YOU FIND MELEANIN THAT THE BLACK IS DOMINANT. ALSO WE FIND THAT EVERY OTHER ETHNICITY HAS HAD THEIR ORIGINS IN AFRICA FROM THE AUSTROLOID THEY ARE DISTINCTIVELY BLACK . IF MAN WAS TO RAD THEIR BIBLE THEY WOULD READ THAT GOD MADE MORE THAN JUST ONE SET OF BALCK PEOLE WHEN HE MADFE ADAAM THAT WAS THEN HE MADE THE PACT WITH MAN AND THEY WOULD BE HIS PEOPLE. THESE BLACK PEOPLE WERE THE WOOLY HAIRED AFRICANS WHO WE SEE INW EST AFRICA AND THE REST THEY BEACME THE MOST DOMINANT IN ALL AFRICA AS WE KNOW THT SOMALIAINS WERE PART OF THE PEOPLE OF THE ORIGINAL AUSTRTOLOID WHO THEN BECAME PART OF THE EAST AFRICAN GENE POOL WESTAFRICA CAME AFTER. ALL ARABIANS WERE ALSO PART OF THE ORIGINAL MIX WHICH WE SEE IN ETHIOPIA THESE ARE ALL ORIGINAL PEOLES. WHERE WE FIND THE WHITES WAS WHEN THE MELANIN WAS NOT PASSED UNTO THEIR CHILDRE WE SAW THIS IN MOSES TIME WE AGAINSAW IT IN JESUSU' TIME AND WE NOW SE IT IN OUR TIMES. THE TANZANIANS ARE THE PEOPLE WHO LATER WERE PUSHED OUT OF AFRICA AND SETTLED AT DIFFERNT TIMES INT EH CAUCUSUES AND THEN WESTERN EUROPE. SO DO NOT GET IT TWISTED THE ORIGINAL BLACK PEOPLE WERE THE FITS AND THE CIVILZERS OF THIS GREAT PLANET FULL STOP. AFRICA IS REDEEMING ITSELF ND THE WHOLE CONTINENT NEEEDS TO BE ON BOARD. AFRICANS WILL NOT ALLOW FOR ANY DENIAL OF HUMANITIES RIGHTS TO DECIDE THEIR OWN DESTINY/ AGAIN WE DONT WANT EXRTREME POLITICS AS WE CAN NOT BECOME JUDGE AND JURORS WE WANT HONESTY RIGHETOUSNESS WE STAND FIRMLY AGAINST INIQUITY ALL ABOMINATIONS ALL SODOMITES AND ANYTHING CONNECTED WITH ANYTHING THAT CROSSES SWORDS WITH THE TAQWA OR THE BELIEF THAT THERE IS "ONE ALMIGHTY GOD" WE IN AFRICA CONTRARY TO WHAT THE WHITES HAVE WRITTEN HAVE ALWAYS BELIVED IN ONE GOD. THEY ARE THE ONES THAT HAVE THREE GODS SO THESE HYPOCRITS NEED TO GET THEIR ARGUMNEST STRAIGHT. WE BELIVE IN "ONE LOVE ONE AIM ONE DESTINY AND MOST OF ALL "ONE GOD" WE ARE LIKE CHRIST WE ARE NOT HERE TO CHANGE THE LAWS BUT TO LIVE BY THE LAWS THIS WHERE WE STAND IN AFRICA"
Liberian woman in kansas won mega million to watch the news go to www.liberiatube.com