The World Economic Forum is best known for its annual meeting at Davos in the Swiss Alps where, recently, focus has been on the poor state of the world economy - particularly that of Europe. So, the annual Africa version of the event (held last week in the swanky surroundings of the Sheraton, Addis Ababa) must make a welcome change, as the atmosphere was robustly positive.
African economies are on the rise, none more so than Ethiopia's which, if you believe the numbers, (and most informed sources do) grew at between 5 and 10 percent over the past half a decade.
Sitting astride this economic growth, and taking pride of place at this year's WEF, was Ethiopian Prime Minister Meles Zenawi. In an event that boasted such political heavyweights as former British PM Gordon Brown, and private sector luminaries like the Ivorian boss of The Prudential, Tidjane Thiam, whose $600 billion worth of assets makes Ethiopia look like a minnow, I was surprised by how much Meles came out as the dominant figure.
A fiercely intelligent man, with a grasp of figures redolent of Brown (whom Meles referred to as 'Prime Minister' throughout) he seemed totally in his element. Perhaps it was the nature of the audience. He was never going to have to field too many tricky questions about Ethiopia's political space, (un)free press or tight government control over telecommunications and banking in front of a room full of CEOs and fellow technocrats.
One senses that in certain crowds his statement that "there is no direct relationship between economic growth and democracy" would have got him in to trouble - important players were gnashing their teeth at this but Meles, kingpin of Western policy in the Horn of Africa, knows exactly how much he can loosen his Marxist instincts without upsetting his donors. To this end, the above was quickly followed by the rider that "democracy is a good thing in and of itself, irrespective of its impact on economic growth." When it was asserted that Africa's post Cold War democratisation was a reason for more recent economic success, Meles scathingly referred to this as "old stuff".
One of the bigger topics of debate across many panels was how public and private sectors can most effectively work together for both economic growth and development. During a discussion on developing African infrastructure, Meles asserted that government would have to lead in the construction of roads, railways, power systems etc because private sector investment in these areas was "miniscule" - the risks are simply too high. Gordon Brown, ever the flexible social democrat, championed the public-private partnership as a means to raise capital for the kind of infrastructure projects that the private sector won't do, and the public sector can't afford.
There were, however, complaints from a number of voices over how public agencies crowd out a stream of private money otherwise poised to flow in to African economies. Although Donald Kaberuka (President of the African Development Bank) countered that any small private investment that had taken place in infrastructure was because public agencies had brought it in.
Whilst Meles asserted that the Ethiopian government would continue to be vigilant over the commercial 'whizzkids' who "come in and use instruments that we don't understand," Jubril Tinubu, CEO of the Nigerian firm, Oando - an energy servicers provider - countered that African governments shouldn't be scared of such people, and instead must realise that the private sector is much bigger and can do things more quickly and cheaply than government. In Nigeria, at least, it is government that is the problem.
Amid the bullishness about economic growth there was caution from, amongst others, Kofi Annan, who stressed the importance of not confusing economic growth with economic transformation. Much work still needs to be done to make African growth inclusive, and the GINI coefficient must be viewed as a central indicator of effective economic policy.
Aside from Meles, several other big names played a significant role in the forum. South African Finance Minister Pravin Gordhan did his international reputation no harm with his measured style, always keeping the most disadvantaged people as the focus of discussion. During a panel on market integration, whilst other panellists were distracted by the bluster of continental currencies and the Trans African Highway, Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, Nigeria's Minister of Finance, displayed her characteristic good sense. She pointed out that organic integration, whether it be informal border trade, or the multinational African staff of South African universities, was already taking place outside of big, top-down projects.
Okonjo-Iweala is clearly a popular figure across the continent - this was shown by the near universal support her candidacy for President of the World Bank received from her African constituents. Like Gordhan, her instincts seem to be in support of the poor, whilst her keen economic brain seeks to facilitate the free movement of goods and people to unlock commercial potential. The World Bank's loss is Nigeria's gain.
So what was the prevailing feeling about this year's WEF? Whilst Meles demonstrated his star quality (with a roguish tendency towards the autocratic and nationalistic) there were a number of other figures of real stature in attendance with claim to positions of continental leadership. Whilst it would be hard to identify a grand narrative, the technical discussion was frighteningly high, underlining the quality of African leadership now available in both the public and private sectors.
It's difficult to think of a panel where a non-African speaker really stole the show, and the most high-profile Western politician in attendance, Gordon Brown, seems to be far better regarded in Africa than he is in the UK. Coming to the continent must be a relief, although it can only be a shock returning home, where it's been 2 years since anyone referred to him as the PM. Maybe it tells us something about Meles, who can't seem to fathom that a political heavyweight like Brown would ever allow himself to be removed from power.
Magnus Taylor is Managing Editor, African Arguments Online.

Comments Post a comment
Thank you for your great analysis. I am Ethiopian. I want to let you know that Prime Minister Meles has been in power for over 21-years; no body elected him, but his party. His party came to power by gorilla war. His party is the only party in the country. No opposing or critics of his party or government has been tolerated. Majority of the people don’t like him for his dishonest behavior.
Now the reason he pretty much show off in this forum is for two reasons. First reason, he wants to show the Ethiopian people as he has been an important figure in the world. In previous years He has been in so many big conference and the government run media show him for several days, discussing with world leaders. So to justify his leadership is acceptable even in the world leader’s eyes. Second reason, he wants to cheat the outside world showing his numbers cooked by his party members as Ethiopia is growing. Since election rigged in 2005, the Prime Minester Meles used a strategy to stay in power masking himself as a development figure covering his undemocratic leadership. The Ethiopian people know him very well, now the problem is the outside world confusion.
Meles is at it again! What makes me wonder is why he is referred to as intelligent. Intelligent people do not kill their own people just because they went out for peaceful demonstrations, intelligent people respect opposing views, intelligent people do not still the poor peoples wealth.
The issue of crowding out by continuous involvement of government in business activities and infrastructure development is a real possibility. But in a developing country like Ethiopia, except the small fledgling privately owned banks, major banks are still owned by government.Therefore government don't borrow from this local banks thereby influencing the interest rate as it happens in countries with well developed financial institutions. Profits from these banks is spent as government expenditure for whatever intentions.Probably the advanced world of PM Gordon Brown should look into this issues and help us to realize the full benefit of real economic freedom
Great artical, Meles Zenawi is the best thing to happen to Ethiopia in a 100 years. Most Ethiopians in the diaspora don't like him because they do not see the growth and take his leadership for granted. Most of the hate is lead by ethnic differences, to simply put it he is hated because he is from the Tigray Province, which is a minority. This man has showen and proven he is a great leader. To the internet thugs that wants to hate because you simply can, just cut it out and accept the fact. The fact is the country is growing and a lot of people are going back home because of it. I know your types, you wish Mengistu was still in Ethiopia. You know what those days are over, and its time for Ethiopia to shine once again, do not hold us back.
Realy it is sad to say or comment about the writer.first you should check about what you writing about ( research) .let me say about pm Meles and leadership did for the country more than any leader in the history of Ethiopia. Why, he is changing the country day by day from school to four season street,standing up to foreign powers for the benefit of the Ethiopian people not to reapt 1984 economy grow having 85 million and more I will stop here!
See All Comments