18 June 2012

Sudan: South Sudanese in the U.S. Urge UN to Hold Sudan Accountable in a Peaceful Rally


New York City, New York — TO: UN Secretary General, Ban Ki-Moon

CC: UNSC, EU, AU, IGADD, US Department of State, White House, US Congress.

June 14, 2012

New York City, New York

We the South Sudanese community and friends in the US, in conjunction with the South Sudan Volunteer Initiative USA branch (SSVI - USA), gather here today because we are deeply concerned about the ongoing crisis between South Sudan and [North] Sudan. Since the Panthou (Heglig) crisis, the government of Sudan has stepped up its aerial campaign against civilians' population as illustrated by the Bentiu bombing on April 12, 2012 and many others. These belligerent actions were met with very little outcry, a sharp contrast from the one towards South Sudan during the Panthou crisis, from the international community. We are urging the international community, particularly the UN Secretary-General, Ban Ki-Moon, the UN Security Council and the African Union (AU), to show fairness and immediately hold Sudan accountable not only for its air campaign against innocent civilians but for its reluctance to take seriously the UNSC resolution 2046, and the African Union's peace and security roadmap in order to negotiate in good faith. We want to forewarn the concerned parties that this reluctance will soon result in further bombardment and more civilians sufferings. We must act now!

While the Sudan government's activities, particularly its continuous attacks on South Sudan since its independence in July last year, and its defiance of the international community's plea to respect human rights, implement the remaining provisions of the CPA, withdraw the remaining 150 troops from Abyei, and stop aerial bombardment of innocent civilians deep inside South Sudan's territory, are not startling to us - for we are used to them (that is the reason we are here), we find it shocking to see the level in which it has been able to easily deceive the international community on almost every issue on the table. In recent past, the fraudulent account of Panthou (Heglig), gained an unprecedented acceptance among some international circles, essentially raising major concerns about the global community's attention span. The Sudan government has never been honest in its dealing with anyone, let alone the international community, and for the international community to take its words for anything, much less at face value, is synonymous to allowing a child molester keeps your children under the pretext that he has recovered. We are reminding the international community about this reality because it is the same pretense that causes the current talks to collapse in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, because Sudan wants to administer all the disputed areas, essentially putting into question their comprehension of the meaning of the word 'disputed.' In Sudan speaks, its position, actions and attitude at the negotiating table in Addis, reinforce what we have been saying all along; that is it wants to and will control the disputed areas whether the international community likes it or not, thus by force.

We also want to note that the Sudan government's conviction of demarcating the borders by force, rather than peacefully, is not hard to believe since it has successfully moved the border southward, resulting in the annexation of Panthou (Heglig) - which, as per the 1/1/1956 border, is part of South Sudan's Unity state, and other areas where oil was discovered. This redrawing of the map in South Sudan by the regime in Khartoum as a result of oil discovery is clearly documented, and thus the reason of the continuous attack on South Sudan, an apparent campaign to annex South Sudan's oil producing state of Unity, to the North.

Many international experts and South Sudanese alike expected this behavior from the Sudan because its refusal to either sign peace pacts or dishonor the ones it signed has been consistent over a long period of time. Eric Reeves, A renowned Sudanese expert from Smith College, put it eloquently when he said "Khartoum has consistently refused to negotiate these areas of the border either within the Technical Boundary Committee (TBC) or through high-level political engagement. Over more than seven years, it has repeatedly refused to convene or participate in good faith in the TBC, to accept the findings of the Abyei Boundaries Commission (ABC) stipulated by the Abyei Protocol of the CPA, or to accept the ruling of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (July 2009)".

Finally, we want to end this message by providing recommendations whose consideration will be the key to redressing the current impasse that Sudan has created. We realized that current talks will not get anywhere because Sudan wants to have its way or no way. To this end;

All hostilities, often instigated by the Sudan, must be cease

All disputed areas must be referred to the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA)

The PCA ruling must be binding and it should be enforced by the international community by whatever means necessary

SAF withdrawal from Abyei must be completed with no exception. Leaving 150 Sudanese troops there is not a complete withdrawal

There must be unimpeded humanitarian access to all civilians displaced by the Sudan bombardment

The arrest warrant of the Sudanese President on crimes against humanity must be carried out

All prisoner of war (POW) held by Sudan must be released

There must be no-fly zone to deter further civilian bombardment and displacement

All South Sudanese students and citizens being held illegally must be released

Current sanctions on Sudan should be tightened and more should be issued


South Sudan Volunteer Initiative (SSVI - USA), South Sudan Communities in the US.

Copyright © 2012 South Sudan News Agency. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com). To contact the copyright holder directly for corrections — or for permission to republish or make other authorized use of this material, click here.

AllAfrica publishes around 2,000 reports a day from more than 130 news organizations and over 200 other institutions and individuals, representing a diversity of positions on every topic. We publish news and views ranging from vigorous opponents of governments to government publications and spokespersons. Publishers named above each report are responsible for their own content, which AllAfrica does not have the legal right to edit or correct.

Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica. To address comments or complaints, please Contact us.