Government leaders, private business representatives, civil society groups and NGOs met recently in Arusha, Tanzania, at the African Green Revolution Forum (AGRF) to discuss strategies to feed a growing world population. One possible solution was to connect Africa's smallholder farmers with big businesses. Corporations bring capital, markets and business savvy to smallholders, conference speakers said. Cargill, a food and agricultural products producer, is one such corporation turning its attention to the continent's small-scale producers.
Johan Steyn, Cargill's country director for the Middle East and Africa, sat down with AllAfrica's Samantha Nkirote McKenzie and Lauren Everitt at AGRF to explain how corporations can support smallholder farmers. Steyn is confident that private investment can improve yields, but says that property rights and government policies must lay the right foundation.
Could you tell us a little bit about your role with Cargill?
I'm based in Johannesburg, South Africa, and my responsibilities are for all of Cargill's investments and operations in Africa and the Middle East in terms of the grain, oil, seeds and cotton businesses.
I've been with the company for about 16 years, all of it based out of South Africa. But I've been traveling extensively through all of Cargill's business areas.
The aim of AGRF is to discuss the problem of feeding a growing global population. What part do you see private investment playing in that?
Actually, if you look at the whole question of food security, it is not a question of 'Do we produce enough calories in the world?' We do.
If you look at the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) figures there's about one billion people that are malnourished. To feed them we need about 30 million tons of grain. And if you look at the biofuel industry today, that's about one-sixth of what they use in the industry. So it's not a question of 'Do we grow enough food in the world?' It's a question of 'Do we have the right policy and the right process, in terms of feeding the world?'
So where do I see Cargill playing a role? Cargill is a corporation. Our vision is very much to be the global leader in nourishing people. We participate in the entire supply chain, from supporting the farmers, both commercial and small-scale, through to processing food ingredients and value-add products. So I really see Cargill, as a private entity, participating in all of that and bringing it all together uplift the smallholder farmers, to incentivize them to continue to grow commodities and ultimately to provide affordable, nutritious and sufficient foodstuffs to everyone.
Could you tell us more specifically about the support that you provide to smallholder farmers?
In the different businesses in Africa, we focus on the cocoa industry, as well as cotton and grains. We serve hundreds of thousands of smallholder farmers. In Zambia we have a customer base of 100,000 smallholder farmers that we provide extension services to. So we provide all of the inputs: fertilizers, chemicals and, very important, the training on how to apply those.
We do a lot of work in educating the farmers on how to produce, but also providing them access to the global markets to ensure that they have a market-related and fair price, as with any other commercial farmer.
Since you started work with them have you seen an improvement?
Yes. We started the project - the Competitive Africa Cotton Initiative - three years ago with public and NGO partners. The objective was to improve yields over three years by 35 percent. We have completed year two in the past season, and the reported yield improvement was 34 percent, so it all but met the targets within two years. There have been various other benefits to the farmers in terms of providing them with better infrastructure, providing them with access to planting machines and various other tools.
So private investment can significantly improve yields, but there's a complaint that it's very difficult to get private investment in agriculture. What do you think should be done to attract more investment in agrosector chains, for smallholders and commercial farming enterprises?
I think one of the key inhibitors to investment in agriculture, whether it's smallholder farmers or commercial farmers, is the rule of law and property rights. To encourage private investment into agriculture, into smallholder farmers, the farmer has to have the certainty of property rights ? to be very comfortable that they have full title. So that's one of the big challenges that we have.
Some clear examples where we've been involved is in Zambia. Zambia has become a major exporter of grains over the last three years because policy is so investment friendly. They work on a 99-year lease basis, but any land improvements that are done are under the ownership of that farmer. So they can transfer the value that they've added to the land to the next person.
If you look at the quality of soil and the availability of water it is no different than some of the neighboring countries like Mozambique, Malawi, Angola, but some in some of these countries you have more challenges around land rights at this stage. If we can get over that hurdle then I think we can very soon see that belt become a major player in grain production.
It's about creating policies and an environment that are healthy for investment.
In that respect do you have any initiatives that involve working directly with governments? How do work with them and how do you see that relationship?
We have two channels. Firstly, we have our corporate affairs team that has constant interaction with governments. We try and share our view and how to improve agriculture in any specific region. We are currently starting up a project in Mozambique through the G8 Grow Africa initiative, where we've been very closely involved with various partners, such as USAID, with the local government and different departments to try to find a way to encourage investment.
What do you hope will be the greatest take-away from this forum?
People talk about Africa as one, and yes, it's one continent but that's where it stops. Africa is a very diverse region with very different cultures, very different climates, very different levels of political maturity. So I think what is important about this [forum] is that best practices are shared, success stories are shared, and hopefully can be taken away by those governments or policy makers to implement in their different countries.
You're the business unit leader for all of Africa and the Middle East. As you say, there is wide diversity in this region. Have you found any policies that have worked across the board? How do you deal with the challenge of regional differences?
No. It's very unique. If you look at North Africa and the Middle East, it's a very different culture and a very different setup. Because of the rainfall it's an arid climate and will remain an importer.
If you look at a country like Egypt, it's the single biggest wheat importer in the world. Yes, the Nile Delta has the biggest yields, but unfortunately it's a very small area. And then you look at sub-Saharan Africa, and it's a region that's got the potential to become a major exporter.
In terms of policy that's consistent across the continent, I've not seen anything that I can say. There are best practices all around but nothing consistent.
Your background is in accounting and finance. More and more we're seeing the merging of finance with agriculture. Could you explain this relationship?
What my background brings is probably a good economic understanding of decision making. As I said earlier, it's not a case of the world not producing enough grain or enough foodstuffs. It's a case of, to quote Greg Page, our CEO, it's a case of economic famine. It's about having people be able to afford foodstuffs. So it's how can we create an environment where we can produce safe, affordable and nutritious food for the entire globe?
It's bringing that kind of financial background, or financial theory into practice on the continent.
Some people view private sector involvement in government and NGO initiatives with some skepticism. Critics say this involvement is motivated by profit and self interest. How do you answer those critics? Does it matter if business in the region is strictly for profit or not?
Ultimately Cargill is a privately owned company. We have a variety of stakeholders. We have shareholders, we have employees, we have governments and we have the communities wherein we work and operate. Without the communities, who are our customers and our suppliers, Cargill wouldn't exist.
So it is very important to us. As I said earlier, Cargill's vision is to be the global leader in nourishing people. We are very committed to that vision. Yes, financially it has to make sense, but if you look at some of the forecasts for 2050 on what the global population is going to be and how we're going to feed this population, I think you have to have a long-term view on Africa. The only way you can do that is through different initiatives, by pulling in NGOs, by pulling in the private sector and involving government because policy setting is going to be critical to make this a success.
Comments Post a comment
When this woman speaks about "private investment" in Africa she is not speaking of Africans owning farms and having agriculture to feed themselves and provide for their own needs. She means continued foreign domination of African agriculture not for the purposes of feeding Africans but for the purposes of profit. As a representative of Cargill, she only sees the future in terms of global multinational agriculture with Cargill as a key player. Multinational agriculture is based on the history of plantation agriculture during the colonial era. It is simply exploitation and slavery. But then everyone knew it was slavery. Now most people are bamboozled and conned by these good sounding gimmicks like "green revolutions" and "sustainable agriculture" and so forth, but in reality those slogans are nothing but PR catchwords used to cover up what is in reality nothing but continued slavery and exploitation.
The only solution for African agriculture is Africans actually owning their land and having a real economy based not simply on being peasant non landowning slaves for a global corporate oligarchy but as owners and controllers of their own land who have the wealth and know how to produce crops for their own consumption first and global trade second. These globalists clowns want it the other way around. They want to own all the land and control what gets grown, where and by whom so that they can maximize their profits. They cannot profit off Africans owning their own land and growing crops with natural seeds and techniques that have worked for the last few thousand years. They cannot profit when Africans are able to feed themselves off their own agricultural output. They want Africans to depend on food grown outside of Africa in order to eat, not because African soil cannot grow such crops, but because that guarantees bigger profits. Therefore they feel African governments should keep the land set aside only for foreigners to own and purchase so foreigners can dictate what to grow and where to grow it, which almost never means growing food for Africans to eat. if bozo beans are the hot commodity, then that is what they will grow. And because they have these governments in their pockets, they will force them to give them the favorable terms and power to be able to do whatever they want using whatever GMO seeds and African slave labor they need. This charade is simply a travesty and people keep allowing the crooks to paint a rosy picture as if what they are doing is anything but exploitation and slavery.
very good website:
===== http://www.abcshopping.org/ =====
The website wholesale for many kinds of fashion shoes, like the nike, jordan, prada, also including the jeans, shirts, bags, hat and the decorations.
WE ACCEPT CREDIT CARD /WESTERN UNION PAYMENT YOU MUST NOT MISS IT!!!
===== http://www.abcshopping.org/ =====