Dr. Donald Kaberuka, the president of the African Development Bank (AfDB), who was recently in Uganda, made a presentation on the subject: From Economic Growth to Economic Transformation. This is an abridged version of his speech.
Economic transformation is characterized by at least three key features. First, the structure of the economy changes depicting an increase in the share of manufacturing coupled with a sustained decline in the share of agriculture. Second, the share of agriculture employment falls while the share of total labor force in other sectors of the economy increases. Third, economic activity shifts from rural areas to the cities leading to an increase in the degree of urbanization.
Therefore, economic transformation is a comprehensive change that encompasses the modernization of a country's economy, society and institutions. In countries where economic transformation has taken place, the middle class has become larger, changes have happened in the way politics works, with emphasis on market-friendly policies and government has become more effective. Experience shows that transformation processes are not uniform. The points of departure matter as much as the leadership and the politics. The process can reveal weaknesses and contradictions in each country that have to be dealt with. In all cases where economic transformation has succeeded, the articulation of a national vision to motivate the people has been crucial. There is no doubt that since independence, African countries have struggled to free the continent from ignorance, poverty and disease.
Despite the setbacks, progress is underway, but beyond that narrower objective. Slow growth made it impossible to go to the next step which is to transform Africa.
While you can have growth without economic transformation, you can never have economic transformation without growth.
The quality of Africa's growth during the past ten years has not been inclusive, with too few jobs created especially for the young people in the booming economies.
Youth unemployment was 20% in 2011, twice the average global rate. The events of the Arab Spring have shown us the paradox of high growth and rising inequality and unemployment requires all of us to reflect seriously on the causes.
In the African Economic Conference 2012 that I have just attended in Kigali, Rwanda, the issue of economic transformation was key. The challenge for Africa's policymakers is to ensure that this time growth leads to economic transformation. A survey of international experiences such as Brazil, Korea, India and China shows that there are no cultural or geographical obstacles to economic transformation.
Rather, they show that there are multiple paths to economic transformation and progress. Indeed, there are "many roads to Damascus."
Comparisons are inherently deceptive, but there is something compelling about the case of Uganda and South Korea. As you will recall, South Korea and Uganda were poor countries at the beginning of the 1960's with per capita GDP of around $100. Today, Uganda's GDP per capita is about $500 and that of South Korea about 60 times more. The gap is largely explained by what was not happening in Uganda. Several well-known bottlenecks impeded Uganda from emulating South Korea's development: low skills development; a weak private sector; poor infrastructure; small internal markets; internal strife, and slow development in agriculture.
It is now almost a truism that economic transformation begins with reforms in agriculture to raise productivity. This was the experience of South Korea in the 1950s and early 1960s and China in the late 1970s.
Along the way, labor moves from low to high productivity sectors. In Asia, governments actively encouraged rural-urban migration to provide cheap labor to the nascent manufacturing sector. The prominent economist Schultz has noted that productivity-led agricultural growth is more important for economic transformation than merely sending "surplus" labor to urban industry. Smallholders are capable of adopting new technologies but need support to overcome external shocks and other impediments.
However, African governments spend much less on agricultural research and development and outreach than their counterparts in Asia and Latin America. It is also significant that only 4% of food crops in Africa are irrigated compared to 30% in Asia.
However, countries that transformed their economies also put emphasis on basic education. There is broad agreement that the best way to end the transmission of poverty from one generation to the other is quality education to the children of the poor.
Research indicates that smallholders with some education are more willing to adopt new agricultural technologies, such as use of fertilizers, and command higher incomes.
Another imperative is linking the economy to the global value-chain. This requires improvements in product design, marketing, and logistics.
The "embedded" technology and know-how that comes with foreign direct investment also raises efficiency and productivity.
Of late, there has been significant debate vis-à-vis the so called "Development State."
The state's role in formulating policies and promoting the private sector is acknowledged. However, that developmental state must be accountable, ensure stability, policy coherence, mobilize the population around a common development agenda, and ensure that resources are set aside to achieve national goals.
However, the risk of the state picking winners and obstructing the market is real. It is therefore important to ensure that state interventions are temporary and that the regulatory framework does not hinder the private sector.
Above all, a developmental state puts emphasis on raising the technical capacity of the country in all relevant areas, including innovation. It uses its convening power to set national goals that are supported by the private sector and civil society. I applaud Uganda's commitment to address constraints to economic transformation. Indeed, imperatives such as private sector development; quality education; infrastructure and institutions that can deliver, are clean and accountable, will allow Uganda to bridge the current development gap with its economic peers.
The Lagos Plan of Action of 1980 envisaged that trade and regional integration would be key to Africa's economic transformation, bringing scale economies in the drive toward industrialization. Regional integration also enables countries to take part in production sharing.
Regional integration is already helping countries in East and Southern Africa to develop robust service industries, including transport and telecommunications, by expanding markets, logistics and supply chains.
The recent Tripartite Free Trade Area agreement between COMESA, EAC and SADC is a good example. It brings together 26 countries, nearly 600 million people, 57% of Africa's population, and a GDP of $700 billion, 58% of Africa's GDP.
For the first time, Africa has a coherent blue-print for the transformation of the continent's infrastructure - the Programme for Infrastructure Development in Africa (PIDA), which was approved by the African Heads of State and Government at their 18th Summit in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia in January 2012.
According to PIDA, Africa will require $360 billion in infrastructure investments in the next 30 years. Using an average GDP growth rate of 6.2% per year, PIDA has estimated that Africa's energy demand will grow six fold to 700 GW, traffic through the major maritime ports by 6 - 8 times to 2 billion tonnes, and demand for ICT services to grow 20-fold.
A total of 51 priority regional infrastructure projects (worth $67.9 billion) in energy, transport, ICT and trans-boundary water constitute the PIDA Priority Action Plan to be implemented by the year 2020.
The public sector alone cannot provide the financing and human resources required to modernize Africa's infrastructure. There is therefore scope for innovative financing involving the private sector.
Infrastructure Bonds have become important for the mobilization of infrastructure financing and the development of domestic capital markets.
Kenya, Ghana, Nigeria, and most recently Zambia, have issued Eurobonds to partly finance infrastructure.
In the case of Zambia, the issue was oversubscribed to the tune of $12 billion, although it only sought $750 million.
The yield, at 5.625%, was better than for distressed economies in Southern Europe.
East Africa is the world's newest oil and gas frontier with oil in Uganda, Sudan, South Sudan and Kenya and gas in Tanzania and Mozambique.
If managed well, with broad cooperation on technologies, pipelines and policies, natural resource wealth could help accelerate economic transformation in the region.
In the past several months, I have presented the Africa Infrastructure Bond project at a number of fora, including the African Parliament in Midrand, South Africa, and to African Governors of the AfDB in Tokyo.
Today, African Central Banks have accumulated up to half a trillion US dollars in reserves. These are held is safe assets, such as US treasuries, but at historically low yields, around 1%.
We have estimated that if only 5% of these reserves are invested with the African Development Bank, a triple A rated institution, to invest in infrastructure, it would amount to $22 billion.
Countries would receive a higher return on their investment, and they would be contributing directly to Africa's development. The Bank recognizes that there are technical, legal, safety and soundness issues, and fiduciary responsibilities relating to these pools of capital and many other considerations related to investment guidelines.
But I do not see insurmountable obstacles. I continue to see this as part of the big push that Africa needs to get on the path to economic transformation.
Economic transformation has been the hope and ambition of many African leaders. Today, that challenge remains as valid as ever. The examples I have shared indicate that economic transformation is possible across a diversity of countries including in Africa.
In addition to the key imperatives such as quality education, improving efficiency and productivity, infrastructure development and regional integration, ensuring that economic transformation is inclusive is equally important.
Economic transformation cannot be achieved in the absence of dedicated and visionary leadership. Many African countries have adopted Vision Statements to guide them toward middle income status. I gather that Uganda is shooting for first World in the next 50 years. None of these ambitions are misplaced. Africa has the resources and the manpower to achieve most of its goals.
The new technologies will make the process easier in some respects, enabling Africa to leapfrog. However, economic transformation is a process and not a goal in itself. The goal is to eradicate poverty.
Success requires that the whole country is carried along, and no one is left behind. It also requires that policy makers are able to resolve the many difficulties and contradictions that accompany the process of transformation. AfDB will do whatever is possible to help our countries undertake this process of economic transformation. Like many others, we believe that the '21st Century is the African Century.'