Although he has heard that circumcision could be beneficial, Elie Kananura, a farmer living in Nyamata sector, Bugesera district is not yet convinced he should undertake it. The father of five, now 48, says he does not yet see any need to go for circumcision since his current status never caused him any harm or illness.
The more pressing issue though is how he would tell his wife that he wants to get circumcised. "How would I introduce it to my wife? I can imagine her asking what my intentions are," he says, adding that he would be interested were he still younger.
Kananura believes other people might still be reluctant to embrace circumcision for various reasons even after the country launched a massive campaign that targets two million men as part of HIV prevention efforts.
Elizabeth Mukamana, the deputy manager of Nyamata health center, confirms they receive only few people seeking circumcision, although she says they have been carrying out sensitization through umuganda, community health workers and some outreach visits by the health center's staff.
"We get about three people per month," she says, adding that while her health center still has few tools, they can ably provide all services. She notes that her staff has been well trained to offer the service.
The Global Aids Report 2012 released last Tuesday says that scaling up voluntary medical male circumcision has the potential to prevent an estimated one in five new HIV infections in Eastern and Southern Africa by 2025. Studies have confirmed that male circumcision reduces HIV infection risk by 60%, though it is not a complete safeguard in case one has sex without a condom.
"It's not a replacement, but an additional strategy," says Dr Sabin Nsanzimana, the head of HIV and other Sexually Transmitted Infectious Diseases Unit at Rwanda Biomedical Center (RBC).
The male circumcision campaign in Rwanda started two years ago with the target to circumcise two million men, but only 50,000 have been circumcised so far, according to statistics provided by RBC. But the doctor remains confident that the target can be reached in two years.
"The program was launched two years ago, but we started with training, resource mobilization and then a pilot phase. All these took a year and a half," explains Nsanzimana, adding that even 50,000 men were circumcised during this year after training medical personnel around the country and providing them with necessary tools.
So far, 450 hospitals and health centers countrywide have got the required tools and trained personnel, he adds. The drive got support from Global Fund, Unaids, and the World Health Organization among other partners.
Now that material and human resources have been put in place, according to Nsanzimana, the health sector will in the next two years be very busy with male circumcision activities. "We still hope that we will have circumcised two million men in two years," he says.
Not covered by mutuelle
The use of Prepex, a non-surgical adult male circumcision procedure performed using the PrePex device will expedite the campaign, he affirms. The Ministry of Health has been carrying out clinical trials on the use of Prepex device since 2009 and has now gained WHO's approval.
The bloodless device was developed for rapid male circumcision and has been used to circumcise 15,000 men.
Though some people are still unenthusiastic, others have already owned the program. For instance, RBC targeted to circumcise 300 students at the National University of Rwanda in a week-long campaign that took place last month, but more than 750 students registered and physicians were able to circumcise only 672.
In a sense, it can be understood that such special promotional occasions might attract many people because the service if offered for free. Yet that is not the case throughout the year, when people go to their health centers or hospitals seeking the service. It isn't even covered by mutuelle de santé.
Nsanzimana says there has been a ministerial meeting to examine whether the circumcision would be covered by mutuelle, but it was realized that this would jeopardize other health services covered by the health insurance scheme.
He therefore notes that there needs to be a further comprehensive examination to look at possibilities to include it into the scheme.
In the meantime, Nsanzimana says they invested a lot in the program to minimize the cost of the service. The investment has been put in buying required tools and this has helped the cost to drop to Frw 2,000 from Frw 10,000.
For needy people, he notes, the government provides support to cover the whole treatment.
Comments Post a comment
There is no data that shows HIV, HPV or any STD change or any real benefit to cutting off parts of a baby boys penis in the US, EU JP....In Africa the same % of cut men and natural penis men have HIV. Real world population studies show that a man with a natural penis is at no higher risk of HIV and HPV.
The International Journal of Men's Health published results of a study that showed circumcised men are 4.5 times more likely to experience erectile dysfunction due to loss of sensitivity. In a further study, The British Journal of Urology International reports that circumcised men can experience up to a 75 percent reduction in sensitivity compared to men who are not circumcised.
The knowledge of the this WOUNDING affecting sexual pleasure and function goes back years so there is NO IF as to SEXUAL HARM, it is a matter of HOW BAD IS IT for any particular guy. Maimonides (the Torah scholar) noted that the act that circumcision weakens the faculty of sexual excitement and sometimes perhaps diminishes the pleasure is indubitable. Kellogg declared a ‘war on masturbation’ at the end of the 19th century and advocated circumcision to curb male sexual urges by removing the main male pleasure parts.
The parts of the penis that are cut off are some of the most highly innervated parts of the human. The lips, nipples and fingertips have similar touch sense. To push this unnatural practice is wrong.
Many professionals have criticized the studies claiming that circumcision reduces HIV transmission. They have various flaws. The absolute rate of HIV transmission reduction is only 1.3%, not the claimed 60%. Authorities that cite the studies have other agendas including political and financial. Research shows that circumcision causes physical, sexual, and psychological harm. This harm is ignored by circumcision advocates. Other methods to prevent HIV transmission (e.g., condoms and sterilizing medical instruments) are much more effective, much cheaper, and much less invasive. Please see http://www.circumcision.org/hiv.htm for more information and links to literature.
This is terribly misguided. In Rwanda presently, it is the circumcised who have markedly higher HIV incidence.
Most of the US men who have died of AIDS were circumcised at birth.
Foreskin feels REALLY good.