Vanguard (Lagos)

Nigeria: Mixed Reactions Trail Ruling On Jonathan

MIXED reactions yesterday trailed the Abuja High Court ruling that President Goodluck Jonathan had the constitutional right to seek re-election into office in 2015.

The leadership of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, and the All Progressive Grand Alliance, APGA, hailed the court ruling saying that the victory was for Nigeria's democracy.

However, the Arewa Consultative Forum, ACF, pooh-poohed the ruling saying that the last cannot be said to have been heard about the matter until the Supreme Court had decided on it.

National Publicity Secretary of ACF, Mr Anthony Sani, who reacted to the court judgement said, "You should know that it is not the end of the court process. Don't you know that the litigant will make sure they exhaust the court processes as laid down by the law? You would recall it was the Supreme Court which ruled that the period served by the six governors before their re-runs must count.

Left to the High Court and Appeal Court, such periods should not count, and those governors who had re-runs should serve for more than the maximum of eight years. So, let us wait until the court processes are exhausted."

However, in a statement signed by the PDP National Publicity Secretary, Chief Olisa Metuh, it noted that with the judgment, it was then left for the party and Nigerians to decide on the next line of action ahead of 2015.

APGA Chairman, Chief Maxi Okwu also hailed the judgement.

Okwu said "Jonathan has right to seek re-election. The constitution did not provide for one and a half tenure of office for the presidency. He has the right to contest for another four years as his final term in office. What I actually detest is the politics of his nomination in his party.

I detest the idea of some people holding him to ransom that he signed agreement to serve for one term. He only exhausted President Musa Yar'Adua term in 2010. It was another person's term.

We don't have one and a half term of office in the constitution," pointing out that it was wrong for some Nigerians to intimidate the President for allegedly signing a-one-term agreement with them."

But Metuh stated, "The leadership of the PDP applauds the ruling by the FCT High Court that President Goodluck Jonathan, as a Nigerian, has the constitutionally guaranteed right to seek re-election in 2015.

"This landmark ruling is yet another victory to the nation's democracy. It has laid to rest the unnecessary debate on whether or not the President is constitutionally eligible to seek re-election in 2015.

"The court held that President Jonathan is in his first term, which commenced on the 29th of May, 2011 and thus is free to seek a second term in office in the 2015 general election under the platform of the PDP or any other political party.

"The import of this judgment is that it is now left for the PDP as party and Nigerians to decide, through legitimate processes, whether or not to return President Jonathan to the Presidency in 2015 if he indicates interest.

"With the ruling, it is now left for the President, the PDP and the people to decide and not for some people to try to stop others from exercising their constitutionally guaranteed rights through intimidations and harassment."

The party however asked Nigerians to continue to be law abiding and resist alleged attempts by desperate politicians to truncate the system through the distortion of the facts of the law, even as it assured that it would continue to focus on the welfare of Nigerians in line with the Transformation Agenda of the President Jonathan-led administration.

  • Comment (1)

Copyright © 2013 Vanguard. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com). To contact the copyright holder directly for corrections — or for permission to republish or make other authorized use of this material, click here.

AllAfrica aggregates and indexes content from over 130 African news organizations, plus more than 200 other sources, who are responsible for their own reporting and views. Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica.

Comments Post a comment

  • mingione
    Mar 2 2013, 22:26

    The Arewa Constituent Assembly argument does not hold water. The court may have ruled in the case of the 6-Governors about their running and re-running. The truth still lies that President Jonathan only ran once as the presidential candidate. In Yar Adua's campaign, he did not run, rather, he was "the running mate" of the president. President Jonathan officially ran and contested for his presidency and won in 2010/2011. Therefore, that act alone constitutes his first time ever as a national candidate for office of the presidency as a national candidate for the PDP. By virtue of our Constitutional dictates, he, as a free citizen of Nigeria has the right and privilege to contest for office for the second time. He merely served out the time left in Yar Adua's time due to his unfortunate death. But to argue that he does not have the right to run and to seek to stop him from running would seem to set a new precedence should he succum to these demands. I frankly do not know what everybody is worried about. In our democracy, we do have primaries. one in which every candidate is constitutionally allwed to throw his/her hat in the ring. It is only the voting public (the electorate) that would decide who becomes the candidate to contest in the national election. If Jonathan is defeated in the process, the message shall have been clear to him that he would not reprpesent his political party as the flag bearer. I really do not understand what the noise is all about. Unless those stressing themselves out are of the opinion that we should rather "select" our candidate for the presidency rather than having the electorate "elect" who should lead us as president in 2015.These meaningless arguments really do not make sense. What is the ACF afraid of? Is it their intent to "select" a buffoon to become the next president? Or, should they not feel more comfortable if the electorate ought to decide who should lead the nation as its president?