3 November 2013

Ethiopia: Global Fight Against Killer Diseases At Crossroads

One of the greatest successes in development aid over the past decade has been the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria. The Global Fund has saved millions of lives and helped countries around the world beat back three epidemic diseases. Now it is appealing to the world's governments and the private sector for another three years of funding, with governments set to decide on further financing in early December in Washington DC.

Back in 2000, the HIV/AIDS epidemic was devastating the world's poorest countries, especially in Africa. New antiretroviral medicines had been developed and were being used in rich countries, but were too expensive for the poorest. Millions of poor people were dying of AIDS, even though the new medicines could have kept them alive.

Two other major killer diseases - malaria and TB - were also resurgent. Deaths from malaria were soaring, partly because poor countries' health systems were dramatically underfunded, and partly because the malaria parasite had developed resistance to the usual medicines. Yet the potential to control malaria was actually improving, thanks to several newly emerging technologies: long-lasting insecticide-treated bed nets to prevent the mosquitoes from biting, better diagnostics to identify infections and a new generation of highly effective medicines.

TB was also getting out of control, becoming a massive disease burden in both Asia and Africa. As with malaria, the TB bacteria had developed resistance to the traditional therapeutic drugs. A frightening new epidemic of multi-drug-resistant TB, or MDR-TB, which was much harder to treat than mainstream TB, had erupted. There were also cases of extreme MDR-TB, called XDR-TB, which resisted even the back-up medicines.

Back in 2000, the rich countries were not taking adequate steps to fight AIDS, TB and malaria. Aid flows were tiny. At the time, I had recently been appointed by the Director-General of the World Health Organisation (WHO) to help bring finance ministers and health ministers together to see what could be done, both immediately and in the longer term.

Our advisory group, known as the Commission on Macroeconomics and Health, recommended that rich countries scale up their health-care aid to poor countries, including efforts to fight AIDS, TB and malaria. This aid would save lives, improve well-being and help to strengthen economic development.

The former Norwegian prime minister, Gro Harlem Brundtland, the remarkable director-general of the WHO at the time, strongly supported this recommendation. At the international AIDS conference in Durban, South Africa, in July 2000, I described why a new global fund was needed to fight AIDS. In early 2001, the former United Nations secretary general, Kofi Annan, launched a powerful and persuasive appeal to establish the Global Fund.

Leaders around the world responded to Annan's call; within months, the Global Fund was born. I remember those days vividly. In international public-health circles, there was great excitement.

Yet, there was also frustration and bewilderment, as vocal opponents of foreign aid began to oppose the increased funding for disease control. Several economists, with little knowledge of public health, became outspoken opponents. They argued on the basis of free-market ideology, rather than evidence, claiming that foreign aid always fails.

Fortunately, world leaders listened to public-health specialists and not to the aid sceptics. US President George W. Bush's administration provided strong and important support to the Global Fund - and also created new US programs to fight AIDS and malaria.

By the second half of the 2000s, programs to fight the three main killer communicable diseases were scaling up around the world. Over the objection of the aid sceptics, the Global Fund provided financial support for the massive free distribution of bed nets, diagnostics and medicines to address malaria.

Lo and behold, for the first time in a generation, deaths from malaria in Africa began to fall (steeply in some places). Hundreds of thousands of lives, mainly African children, were now being saved every year. Children were spared not only death, but also debilitating infections, enabling them to attend school and lead more productive lives in the future.

The same thing happened with HIV/AIDS and TB. Back in 2000, before the Global Fund was established, infected people in developing countries died of AIDS without any chance of receiving life-saving antiretroviral medicines. By 2010, more than six million people in developing countries were receiving antiretroviral treatment. Similarly, testing and treatment for TB rose sharply, including a strong increase in several heavily affected Asian countries.

The aid sceptics were proved wrong. Aid for health has worked. The world has benefited enormously from this triumph of generosity, professionalism, common decency and good sense.

Yet the battle to mobilise adequate financing remains. The same sceptics repeat their tired opposition without reference to a decade of evidence. It is shocking how their free-market fundamentalism (or simply ideological opposition to aid of any kind) can blind them to life-and-death needs and the efficacy of practical approaches that are well known to health professionals. They are also blind to professional methods in other areas, such as food production.

The Global Fund is urgently appealing for a minimum of five billion dollars per year for the next three years - a tiny sum relative to the world economy (and equal to roughly five dollars per person in the high-income countries). It could wisely use twice that amount.

It seems likely that the US Government will agree to contribute one-third of the five billion dollars, if the rest of the world delivers the remainder. The UK recently made a strong pledge, and the world now awaits the announcements of Germany, Canada, Australia, Japan and other long-standing and new donor countries in Europe, the Middle East and Asia.

Millions of people around the world will live, or die, depending on what these governments decide in December. May they, and we, choose life.

 Jeffrey Sachs Is Professor of Sustainable Development, Professor of Health Policy and Management, and Director of the Earth Institute At Columbia University. This Commentary Is Provided to Fortune By Project Syndicate.


Saint George Wins Ethiopian Super Cup

Saint George beat rivals Defence Force 5-4 on penalties on Sunday, 4 October 2015 in Addis Ababa to win the Ethiopian … see more »

Copyright © 2013 Addis Fortune. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com). To contact the copyright holder directly for corrections — or for permission to republish or make other authorized use of this material, click here.

AllAfrica publishes around 2,000 reports a day from more than 130 news organizations and over 200 other institutions and individuals, representing a diversity of positions on every topic. We publish news and views ranging from vigorous opponents of governments to government publications and spokespersons. Publishers named above each report are responsible for their own content, which AllAfrica does not have the legal right to edit or correct.

Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica. To address comments or complaints, please Contact us.