Nigeria: The Power and Limits of Stoma-Structure

18 August 2014
opinion

"We do like vote-buying. It is essential. That is the only way we have to see anything good coming from the politicians. Anyway, I can vote for whoever I want." - Anonymous (Sao Tome) in 'Is Vote-Buying Effective? Evidence from a Field Experiment in West Africa' by Pedro Vicente If Marcus were a poor man which our ancestors forbid-I should be the first to give him my paper [vote] for free, as I did before. But today Marcus is a great man and does his things like a great man. We did not ask him for money yesterday; we shall not ask him tomorrow. But today is our day; we have climbed the iroko tree today and would be foolish not to take down all the firewood we need." - Ogbuefi Ezenwa in Chinua Achebe's short story 'The Voter' With the recent governorship elections in Ekiti and Osun, a new expression has wangled its way into our political lexicon. It is "stomach infrastructure," a term I want to further stylize as stoma-structure. Contrary to what some politicians and commentators want us to believe, the practice covered by that expression is not new. It is just a new name for an old practice: vote-buying. And contrary also to some claims, vote-buying is not new in the south-west or in the rest of Nigeria. The practice is criminalized, at least according to sections 124 and 130 of the 2010 Electoral Act. But that doesn't bother those who value it because prosecution is difficult and possibly not worth anyone's while. So, vote-buying as well as vote-selling, its tango-mate, will not leave the political dance floor anytime soon. In fact, voting-buying has been so mythologised in these two recent elections that it is safe to bet that it will feature prominently in next year's general election and beyond. But is stoma-structure the major determinant of electoral outcome? No. A lot, I think, will still rise and fall on context. Before interrogating the new profile and the utility of stoma-structure, it is important to differentiate it from its more theorized but equally derided cousins such as patronage-politics, pork-barrel politics, neo-patrimonialism and political clientelism. Unlike these other forms of disdained political exchanges, stoma-structure is the swapping of votes for raw cash or other stomach-tailored things like rice, kerosene, and odorless fufu.

It is also important to state that all elections involve one form of exchange or the other. In the ideal case, the voters exchange their franchise for a promise of quality representation or responsive governance. In some instances, the exchange is to reinforce a worldview about how society should be ordered. Yet in some, the exchange is for past or promised favours. But in the case of stoma-structure, franchise is exchanged for immediate belly-gratification just by itself or as a reinforcement of one or more of the preceding reasons. What this means is that shortly before and during elections, there is an active market for votes, with potential buyers and sellers who have different value thresholds. When elections are about ideals and values, the exchange is also idealised or doesn't involve exchange of cash or its equivalents. But the exchange is sometimes monetized, as in the case of stoma-structure where the assigned value is also front-loaded. Viewed from a normative sense, stoma-structure is the crass end of the spectrum in the market for votes, where no self-respecting and enlightened voter should be found, for it denotes that his/her vote (alongside his/her choice, conscience, soul) is literally for sale. It also suggests that the voter thinks and chooses with his/her belly and is ready to, for a plate of porridge, stomach unaccountable representation and bad governance. But as said earlier, this is an age-long, though shadowy, practice that has now been surfaced and mainstreamed by a number of factors, some of which I will highlight shortly. 'The Voter,' a short story by Chinua Achebe, puts the age and existence of vote-buying in full relief. The story was first published in 1965 (and later in 1972 in the collection of Achebe's short stories, Girls at War and Other Stories). Though fictional, this story clearly mirrored political life during the First Republic and the later part of the colonial era. The second quote above is taken from a point in the story where the elders of Umuofia were negotiating the price of their votes with Rufus Okeke, the campaign manager of Chief the Honourable Marcus Ibe, who was seeking re-election. Having seen how Ibe became suddenly important and rich just by representing them, the elders had to bargain hard and Okeke had to double the money on offer to four shillings per elder. The story ended with a dramatic twist, when Okeke the campaign manager was in a dilemma over who to vote for because he had collected five pounds (and sworn to a fearsome juju) to vote for the opponent of his own candidate. Vote buying did not disappear with the First Republic. As a teenager, I saw a bit of this in the 1983 election. The ward chairman of a political party that was not popular in our area used to go round, promising women salt, sugar, milk and some money if they would vote for his party. Most of these women rejected the offer because the popular party had earned their support with clear performance that positively touched their lives and those of their kids and it was a time when many people could withstand temptation because they could afford the basic necessities of life.

...

AllAfrica publishes around 400 reports a day from more than 100 news organizations and over 500 other institutions and individuals, representing a diversity of positions on every topic. We publish news and views ranging from vigorous opponents of governments to government publications and spokespersons. Publishers named above each report are responsible for their own content, which AllAfrica does not have the legal right to edit or correct.

Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica. To address comments or complaints, please Contact us.