7 December 2017

Nigeria: Why Ogfza Should Treat Intels Fairly

opinion

Undoubtedly, the various measures that have been enunciated in recent times by the Federal Government particularly in the realm of rolling out of Executive Orders to eliminate difficulties in the Easy of Doing Business in all sectors of the economy and as such promote Foreign Direct Investment (FDIs) in Nigeria have been very laudable and forward looking.

However, analysts believe that the subsequent increase in the level of inflow of FDI into the Nigerian economy, which should be the positive outcome of the policies that are being initiated could be a mirage, unless the agencies of government executing the measures carry out their assignment with sincerity and integrity backed by the requisite political will.

For instance, the current unnecessary face off being orchestrated against the Oil and gas giant, Intels Nigeria Limited (INL) by the Oil and Gas Free Zone Authority (OGFZA) over various matters is portraying the Ease of Doing Business initiative in negative light and acting as a discouragement to the quest to attract FDI into Nigeria.

For the benefit of hindsight, a major issue of contention between the two parties is the refusal of OGFZA to renew the 2017 Operating License for Intels despite that it has paid in full the renewal fee for the licence.The Free Zone Authority is insisting that INL has to pay all charges and fees demanded by it for the license to be released to INL.

There are also issues of imposition of land charges on INL by OGFZA, nullification of INL's Industry Wide Standard Tariff (IWST) and other port related charges and the OGFZA management's penchant for conveying to agencies and clients messages that are injurious to INL business interest and reputation and the non-payment for INTEL's premises occupied by OGFZA at Onne and Heliconia Park Estate.

The crisis which is Akin to a mass actions against Intels because they are multifaceted in nature are already causing a serious embarrassment and financial setbacks to its operations and little wonder that the company has been compiling all its losses, pecuniary and otherwise and may institute legal actions against the OGFZA at the right time if the harassment persists.

The ongoing crisis between the two bodies has been considered to be unfortunate and a situation which is antithetical to the government drive to attract FDI for the fact that it had been a distraction and a source of discouragement to prospective foreign investors and the existing ones, which have looked up to Intels as a model of a successful FDI.

Beyond this, OGFZA being a government agency of sort; its negative measures against INL have indeed being a paradox to the role it is expected to be playing in the implementation of the renewed efforts of the Presidency at attracting and boosting investments in Nigeria particularly in the oil and gas sector which is currently the mainstay of the economy.

It should also be realized that Intels, which founder is an Italian has overtime because of its accomplishments in Nigeria not just in the oil and gas sector but also in estates, concessioning projects and maritime , where it has in an enviable way , set up a model port in the country has proved to be a very law abiding corporate entity which prospective and existing FDIs have looked up to.

Thus as the government forges ahead in its quest to woo more foreign investors to the economy through its reforms to enhance the Ease of Doing Business, it should also sensitize and educate its agencies which will implement the measures to be transparent because they would be investors are watching, but the current actions of OGFZA against INL cannot be said to be encouraging them.

However, in the interest of fair play and justice which are integral indices of the Executive Orders, OGFZA is indeed under obligation to renew INL free zone license because it has paid the prescribed free zone license fees for the 2017 Operating License after filing the 2016 annual return along with other formalities. This became necessary when the land charges being disputed by INL are not due until the dispute is settled.

So as not to cripple INL's operations, it is also imperative that OGFZA needs to pay its debts to Intels namely $27,548.85 and N24,912,510.42 for the various services it has provided for it as well as the sum of $1,719,246.28 for use of INL's facilities by OGFZA at various locations including Onne, Heliconia Park Estate, Aba Road Estate both in Port Harcourt, Rivers State and Warri, Delta State.

On the issue of lease and sub-lease surcharge being demanded by OGFZA and which is still in dispute between it and INL, legally, Intels should be excluded from the payment by the interpretation of the S. 14 of the Free Zone (Tariffs & Other Charges) Order 2015 which expressly exempts Concessionaires like INL from OGFZA's charges by providing that the tariffs are only applicable to individual licensee.

Also for the fact that the premises Intels occupies in the ports were granted by the Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA), which is the owner of the land, OGFZA does not have any legal authority to administer or manage land vested in the NPA in any manner whatsoever.

The truth is that in the interest of the two parties, the oil and gas sector and the need to attract the needed FDI to the economy, OGFZA and INL should urgently enter into discussions with a view to resolving the matters amicably. Politics in whatever guise should however be removed from the negotiations while fair play and transparency should prevail for result to be achieved.

Dada wrote this piece from Abuja.

Nigeria

Nuclear Agency Spent Millions Illegally - Senate Panel

The Nigerian Nuclear Regulatory Authority (NNRA) generated N490million as Internally Generated Revenue (IGR) in 11… Read more »

Copyright © 2017 Daily Trust. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com). To contact the copyright holder directly for corrections — or for permission to republish or make other authorized use of this material, click here.

AllAfrica publishes around 900 reports a day from more than 140 news organizations and over 500 other institutions and individuals, representing a diversity of positions on every topic. We publish news and views ranging from vigorous opponents of governments to government publications and spokespersons. Publishers named above each report are responsible for their own content, which AllAfrica does not have the legal right to edit or correct.

Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica. To address comments or complaints, please Contact us.